Evaluation of pavement design input parameters of biaxial and triaxial geogrid stabilized flexible pavements overlying soft subgrades

Ramu Baadiga , Umashankar Balunaini
{"title":"Evaluation of pavement design input parameters of biaxial and triaxial geogrid stabilized flexible pavements overlying soft subgrades","authors":"Ramu Baadiga ,&nbsp;Umashankar Balunaini","doi":"10.1016/j.clema.2023.100192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Stabilization of flexible pavement layers using geogrids to improve the mechanical response of pavement layers is gaining importance over conventional stabilization techniques due to their low cost and superior performance. However, the lack of experimental data on quantifying the design input parameters of stabilized subgrades or granular layers limits the extensive use of geogrids in the field. Evaluation of design input parameters such as modulus improvement factor (MIF) or layer coefficient ratio (LCR) would promote the use of geogrids in the pavement, reducing the consumption of natural aggregates and the overall project cost. This study attempts to evaluate MIF and LCR due to geogrid stabilized soft subgrades considering different scenarios. All possible combinations of stabilization of pavement layers using biaxial and triaxial geogrids were considered. This involved stabilization of (a) the subgrade layer alone, (b) base layer alone, and (c) subgrade, subbase, and base layers. Accordingly, an extensive, systematic experimental program consisting of eighteen large-scale model pavement experiments (LSMPE) were conducted in five categories (designated as Series I through V). The stabilization of subgrade and granular layers was carried out using commercially available biaxial (BX1 and BX2) and triaxial (TX1) geogrids overlying soft and moderate subgrades with California bearing ratio (CBR) equal to 2.5 and 4%. Test results showed that stabilized subgrade prepared with existing and prepared subgrade material in conjunction with geogrid improved the effective CBR to as high as 10.9% from effective CBR = 7% corresponding to existing and prepared subgrade material without geogrid. The design inputs of geogrids (BX1/BX2/TX1) stabilized granular layers resulted in the MIF and LCR values ranging from 1.9 to 2.8 and 1.31 to 1.63, respectively, for the tested configuration considered in the study. Based on the findings of the study, inputs on resilient modulus of pavement layers were recommended for similar reinforcement and subgrade conditions considered.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100254,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Materials","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772397623000254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stabilization of flexible pavement layers using geogrids to improve the mechanical response of pavement layers is gaining importance over conventional stabilization techniques due to their low cost and superior performance. However, the lack of experimental data on quantifying the design input parameters of stabilized subgrades or granular layers limits the extensive use of geogrids in the field. Evaluation of design input parameters such as modulus improvement factor (MIF) or layer coefficient ratio (LCR) would promote the use of geogrids in the pavement, reducing the consumption of natural aggregates and the overall project cost. This study attempts to evaluate MIF and LCR due to geogrid stabilized soft subgrades considering different scenarios. All possible combinations of stabilization of pavement layers using biaxial and triaxial geogrids were considered. This involved stabilization of (a) the subgrade layer alone, (b) base layer alone, and (c) subgrade, subbase, and base layers. Accordingly, an extensive, systematic experimental program consisting of eighteen large-scale model pavement experiments (LSMPE) were conducted in five categories (designated as Series I through V). The stabilization of subgrade and granular layers was carried out using commercially available biaxial (BX1 and BX2) and triaxial (TX1) geogrids overlying soft and moderate subgrades with California bearing ratio (CBR) equal to 2.5 and 4%. Test results showed that stabilized subgrade prepared with existing and prepared subgrade material in conjunction with geogrid improved the effective CBR to as high as 10.9% from effective CBR = 7% corresponding to existing and prepared subgrade material without geogrid. The design inputs of geogrids (BX1/BX2/TX1) stabilized granular layers resulted in the MIF and LCR values ranging from 1.9 to 2.8 and 1.31 to 1.63, respectively, for the tested configuration considered in the study. Based on the findings of the study, inputs on resilient modulus of pavement layers were recommended for similar reinforcement and subgrade conditions considered.

软土路基上双轴和三轴土工格栅稳定柔性路面设计输入参数的评估
与传统的稳定技术相比,使用土工格栅来改善路面层的机械响应的柔性路面层的稳定由于其低成本和优异的性能而变得越来越重要。然而,由于缺乏量化稳定路基或颗粒层设计输入参数的实验数据,限制了土工格栅在现场的广泛使用。对模量改善系数(MIF)或层系数比(LCR)等设计输入参数的评估将促进土工格栅在路面中的使用,减少天然骨料的消耗和总体项目成本。本研究试图评估考虑不同情景的土工格栅稳定软路基的MIF和LCR。考虑了使用双轴和三轴土工格栅稳定路面层的所有可能组合。这涉及(a)单独的路基层,(b)单独的基层,以及(c)路基、底基层和基层的稳定。因此,进行了一个广泛、系统的实验计划,包括18个大型模型路面实验(LSMPE),分为五类(指定为系列I至V)。路基和颗粒层的稳定使用商用双轴(BX1和BX2)和三轴(TX1)土工格栅进行,土工格栅覆盖加利福尼亚承载比(CBR)等于2.5%和4%的软路基和中等路基。试验结果表明,用现有和已制备的路基材料与土工格栅联合制备的稳定路基将有效CBR从现有和未制备的无土工格栅路基材料的有效CBR=7%提高到10.9%。土工格栅(BX1/BX2/TX1)稳定颗粒层的设计输入导致研究中考虑的测试配置的MIF和LCR值分别在1.9至2.8和1.31至1.63之间。根据研究结果,建议在考虑类似加固和路基条件的情况下,对路面层的弹性模量进行输入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信