Speech Elicitation Methods for Measuring Articulatory Control.

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Claudia I Abbiati, Kimberly R Bauerly, Shelley L Velleman
{"title":"Speech Elicitation Methods for Measuring Articulatory Control.","authors":"Claudia I Abbiati, Kimberly R Bauerly, Shelley L Velleman","doi":"10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Spatiotemporal index (STI) is a common measure of articulatory variability used to examine speech-motor control. However, the methods used to elicit productions for measuring STI have varied across studies. The aim of this study was to determine whether STI values are affected by changes in elicitation methods.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Lip aperture STI (LA STI) was calculated for 19 monolingual English-speaking young adults based upon the production of four declarative sentences that varied by length and complexity. Using a 2 × 2 design, productions were elicited under the following two conditions: repetition type (consecutive vs. pseudorandom) and stimulus presentation type (auditory vs. combined auditory and visual). Conditions for eliciting productions were counterbalanced among participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a main effect of repetition type (<i>p</i> < .001) and sentence type (<i>p</i> < .030). Pseudorandom repetitions resulted in higher mean LA STI values across sentence types compared to those computed from consecutive repetitions. There were no significant differences for stimulus presentation type. That is, no differences in mean LA STI were found between the auditory versus combined auditory and visual presentations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings show that the methods used to elicit sentence productions have a significant effect on LA STI values. Findings suggest that there is a need for researchers to consider these effects when designing methods for measuring LA STI.</p>","PeriodicalId":51254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","volume":" ","pages":"4107-4114"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11546903/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00056","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Spatiotemporal index (STI) is a common measure of articulatory variability used to examine speech-motor control. However, the methods used to elicit productions for measuring STI have varied across studies. The aim of this study was to determine whether STI values are affected by changes in elicitation methods.

Method: Lip aperture STI (LA STI) was calculated for 19 monolingual English-speaking young adults based upon the production of four declarative sentences that varied by length and complexity. Using a 2 × 2 design, productions were elicited under the following two conditions: repetition type (consecutive vs. pseudorandom) and stimulus presentation type (auditory vs. combined auditory and visual). Conditions for eliciting productions were counterbalanced among participants.

Results: There was a main effect of repetition type (p < .001) and sentence type (p < .030). Pseudorandom repetitions resulted in higher mean LA STI values across sentence types compared to those computed from consecutive repetitions. There were no significant differences for stimulus presentation type. That is, no differences in mean LA STI were found between the auditory versus combined auditory and visual presentations.

Conclusions: Our findings show that the methods used to elicit sentence productions have a significant effect on LA STI values. Findings suggest that there is a need for researchers to consider these effects when designing methods for measuring LA STI.

测量发音控制的言语诱导方法。
目的:时空指数(STI)是衡量发音变异性的常用指标,用于检查言语运动控制。然而,用于引发STI测量结果的方法在不同的研究中有所不同。本研究的目的是确定STI值是否受到启发方法变化的影响。方法:根据四个陈述句的产生情况,计算19名英语单语青年的唇口STI(LA STI),这些陈述句因长度和复杂性而异。使用2×2设计,在以下两种条件下产生:重复类型(连续与伪随机)和刺激呈现类型(听觉与听觉和视觉的组合)。激发作品的条件在参与者之间得到了平衡。结果:重复类型(p<.001)和句子类型(p<.030)是主要影响因素。与连续重复计算的LA STI值相比,伪随机重复导致不同句子类型的平均LA STI值更高。刺激呈现类型没有显著差异。也就是说,在听觉和视觉联合表现之间,没有发现平均LA STI的差异。结论:我们的研究结果表明,引发句子产生的方法对LA STI值有显著影响。研究结果表明,研究人员在设计测量LA STI的方法时需要考虑这些影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
19.20%
发文量
538
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: JSLHR publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on the normal and disordered processes in speech, language, hearing, and related areas such as cognition, oral-motor function, and swallowing. The journal is an international outlet for both basic research on communication processes and clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, and management of communication disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. JSLHR seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of communication sciences and disorders, including speech production and perception; anatomy and physiology of speech and voice; genetics, biomechanics, and other basic sciences pertaining to human communication; mastication and swallowing; speech disorders; voice disorders; development of speech, language, or hearing in children; normal language processes; language disorders; disorders of hearing and balance; psychoacoustics; and anatomy and physiology of hearing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信