Effect of Different Levels of Salivary pH on the Shear Bond Strength of Two Orthodontic Adhesive Systems for Bracket Placement: An In-vitro Study

Q3 Dentistry
Angelita Carpio Contreras, Abraham López, L. Arriola-Guillén
{"title":"Effect of Different Levels of Salivary pH on the Shear Bond Strength of Two Orthodontic Adhesive Systems for Bracket Placement: An In-vitro Study","authors":"Angelita Carpio Contreras, Abraham López, L. Arriola-Guillén","doi":"10.4103/jofs.jofs_109_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of four different salivary pH levels on the shear bond strength (SBS) of two orthodontic adhesive systems for bracket placement. Materials and Methods: This in-vitro experimental study was performed on 72 premolars extracted for orthodontic reasons. They were randomly assigned into two groups according to the adhesive system employed: Orthocem (light-cure adhesive, FGM®) or Transbond-XT (3M Unitek). Each group involved nine specimens incubated in artificial saliva at four pH levels regarding previous studies: acidic pH (4.8 and 5.8), control pH (6.8) and alkaline pH (7.8), during two months. Once removed, shear bond strength with a universal testing machine was applied. The SBS comparisons between adhesive systems was obtained using t-test and for salivary pH levels in each group one-way ANOVA and Tukey tests were used (P < 0.05). Results: Transbond-XT adhesive system showed the greater SBS, mainly in the neutral salivary pH (11.18 ± 2.82 Mpa) followed by the alkaline (10.33 ± 2.49 Mpa) (P > 0.05). Significant differences were found regarding to both acidic pH levels (pH 4.8 and 5.8) with values between 6 and 8 MPa (P < 0.05). Moreover, Orthocem adhesive system had lower SBS values, with greater value in the neutral salivary pH (6.24 Mpa), don’t achieved significant differences with the other pH levels; 4.74 Mpa for pH 4.8 and 5.05 Mpa for pH 5.8. Conclusion: Transbond XT orthodontic adhesive system showed only greater values of SBS only for the control and alkaline pH levels; for acidic pH levels there was no difference between the two systems. This situation must be taken into account by clinicians.","PeriodicalId":16651,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orofacial Sciences","volume":"12 1","pages":"47 - 51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orofacial Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jofs.jofs_109_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of four different salivary pH levels on the shear bond strength (SBS) of two orthodontic adhesive systems for bracket placement. Materials and Methods: This in-vitro experimental study was performed on 72 premolars extracted for orthodontic reasons. They were randomly assigned into two groups according to the adhesive system employed: Orthocem (light-cure adhesive, FGM®) or Transbond-XT (3M Unitek). Each group involved nine specimens incubated in artificial saliva at four pH levels regarding previous studies: acidic pH (4.8 and 5.8), control pH (6.8) and alkaline pH (7.8), during two months. Once removed, shear bond strength with a universal testing machine was applied. The SBS comparisons between adhesive systems was obtained using t-test and for salivary pH levels in each group one-way ANOVA and Tukey tests were used (P < 0.05). Results: Transbond-XT adhesive system showed the greater SBS, mainly in the neutral salivary pH (11.18 ± 2.82 Mpa) followed by the alkaline (10.33 ± 2.49 Mpa) (P > 0.05). Significant differences were found regarding to both acidic pH levels (pH 4.8 and 5.8) with values between 6 and 8 MPa (P < 0.05). Moreover, Orthocem adhesive system had lower SBS values, with greater value in the neutral salivary pH (6.24 Mpa), don’t achieved significant differences with the other pH levels; 4.74 Mpa for pH 4.8 and 5.05 Mpa for pH 5.8. Conclusion: Transbond XT orthodontic adhesive system showed only greater values of SBS only for the control and alkaline pH levels; for acidic pH levels there was no difference between the two systems. This situation must be taken into account by clinicians.
不同唾液pH水平对两种正畸托槽粘接系统剪切结合强度的影响:体外研究
引言:本研究的目的是比较四种不同唾液pH水平对两种用于托槽放置的正畸粘合剂系统的剪切结合强度(SBS)的影响。材料与方法:对72颗因正畸原因拔除的前磨牙进行体外实验研究。根据使用的粘合剂系统,他们被随机分为两组:Orthocem(光固化粘合剂,FGM®)或Transbond XT(3M Unitek)。根据之前的研究,每组包括9个在人工唾液中培养的样本,其pH值为四个水平:酸性pH值(4.8和5.8)、对照pH值(6.8)和碱性pH值(7.8),为期两个月。移除后,使用通用试验机施加剪切结合强度。结果:Transbond-XT粘合剂系统显示出更大的SBS,主要在中性唾液pH(11.18 ± 2.82Mpa),然后是碱性(10.33 ± 2.49Mpa)(P>0.05)。两种酸性pH水平(pH 4.8和5.8)的值在6-8之间存在显著差异 此外,Orthocem粘合剂体系的SBS值较低,在中性唾液pH(6.24Mpa)下的SBS值较大,与其他pH水平没有显著差异;pH 4.8时为4.74Mpa,pH 5.8时为5.05Mpa。结论:Transbond-XT口腔正畸粘合剂体系仅在对照和碱性pH水平下显示出较大的SBS值;对于酸性pH水平,两个系统之间没有差异。临床医生必须考虑到这种情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orofacial Sciences
Journal of Orofacial Sciences Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
31 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orofacial Sciences is dedicated to noblest profession of Dentistry, and to the young & blossoming intellects of dentistry, with whom the future of dentistry will be cherished better. The prime aim of this journal is to advance the science and art of dentistry. This journal is an educational tool to encourage and share the acquired knowledge with our peers. It also to improves the standards and quality of therauptic methods. This journal assures you to gain knowledge in recent advances and research activities. The journal publishes original scientific papers with special emphasis on research, unusual case reports, editorial, review articles, book reviews & other relevant information in context of high professional standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信