Standard Patterns of Considerations in Law, District Regulation and Qanun Based on Legal Rules in Indonesia

Husna Sartika, Eddy Purnama, Ilyas Ismail
{"title":"Standard Patterns of Considerations in Law, District Regulation and Qanun Based on Legal Rules in Indonesia","authors":"Husna Sartika, Eddy Purnama, Ilyas Ismail","doi":"10.25041/plr.v2i2.2446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The consequence of the state of the law is legislation to be an essential instrument in regulating public life. However, in some parts of Indonesia, they can make their regional regulation slightly different from the constitution, wherein this article will focus on Qanun in Aceh Province. The research used in this paper is normative law research. This research used sequential data or library data. Secondary data consists of primary law materials, secondary law materials, and tertiary law materials. The approach method used is the legislative approach and the conceptual approach. The formulation of the problem in this paper is how the standard pattern of consideration in the Law, Regional Regulations, and Qanun is based on legislation. The results show that in the Law in Consideration, Consider using the word \"membentuk\" or \"form\" because the law-making institution consists of legislative institutions and executive institutions. Regional regulation considers using the word \"menetapkan\" or \"establish\" because the institution that makes local regulations is a local government consisting of elements of local governments and local people's representative councils. This consideration follows Annex II of Law Number 12 of 2011 on the Establishment of Legislation as amended by Law Number 15 of 2019. However, the Qanun used the word \"membentuk\" or \"form\" due following Article 233 paragraph (1) of Law Number 11 the Year 2006 on Aceh Governance and Annex II of Aceh Qanun Number 5 of 2011 on the Procedures for the Establishment of Qanun.","PeriodicalId":52575,"journal":{"name":"Pancasila and Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pancasila and Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25041/plr.v2i2.2446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The consequence of the state of the law is legislation to be an essential instrument in regulating public life. However, in some parts of Indonesia, they can make their regional regulation slightly different from the constitution, wherein this article will focus on Qanun in Aceh Province. The research used in this paper is normative law research. This research used sequential data or library data. Secondary data consists of primary law materials, secondary law materials, and tertiary law materials. The approach method used is the legislative approach and the conceptual approach. The formulation of the problem in this paper is how the standard pattern of consideration in the Law, Regional Regulations, and Qanun is based on legislation. The results show that in the Law in Consideration, Consider using the word "membentuk" or "form" because the law-making institution consists of legislative institutions and executive institutions. Regional regulation considers using the word "menetapkan" or "establish" because the institution that makes local regulations is a local government consisting of elements of local governments and local people's representative councils. This consideration follows Annex II of Law Number 12 of 2011 on the Establishment of Legislation as amended by Law Number 15 of 2019. However, the Qanun used the word "membentuk" or "form" due following Article 233 paragraph (1) of Law Number 11 the Year 2006 on Aceh Governance and Annex II of Aceh Qanun Number 5 of 2011 on the Procedures for the Establishment of Qanun.
基于印尼法律规则的法律、地区法规和监管考量的标准模式
法律状况的结果是,立法成为规范公共生活的重要工具。然而,在印度尼西亚的一些地区,他们可以使其地区法规与宪法略有不同,其中本文将重点关注亚齐省的卡农。本文所使用的研究是规范法研究。这项研究使用了序列数据或库数据。二级数据包括一级法律材料、二级法律材料和三级法律材料。所采用的方法是立法方法和概念方法。本文提出的问题是,《法律》、《地区条例》和《卡农法案》中的标准审议模式是如何建立在立法基础上的。结果表明,在对价法中,考虑使用“membentuk”或“form”一词,因为立法机构由立法机构和行政机构组成。地区法规考虑使用“menetapkan”或“建立”一词,因为制定地方法规的机构是由地方政府和地方人民代表委员会组成的地方政府。本审议遵循经2019年第15号法律修订的2011年第12号法律《建立立法》附件二。然而,根据2006年关于亚齐治理的第11号法律第233条第(1)款和2011年关于设立Qanun程序的第5号亚齐Qanun附件二,Qanun使用了“membentuk”或“form”一词。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信