Significance testing of the Altaic family

IF 0.6 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Diachronica Pub Date : 2019-09-17 DOI:10.1075/dia.17007.ceo
Andrea Ceolin
{"title":"Significance testing of the Altaic family","authors":"Andrea Ceolin","doi":"10.1075/dia.17007.ceo","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Historical linguists have been debating for decades about\n whether the classical comparative method provides sufficient evidence to\n consider Altaic languages as part of a single genetic unity, like Indo-European\n and Uralic, or whether the implicit statistical robustness behind regular sound\n correspondences is lacking in the case of Altaic. In this paper, I run a\n significance test on Swadesh-lists representing Turkish, Mongolian and Manchu to\n see if there are regular patterns of phonetic similarities or correspondences\n among word-initial phonemes in the basic vocabulary that cannot be expected to\n have arisen by chance. The methodology draws on Oswalt (1970), Ringe (1992), Baxter &\n Manaster Ramer (2000) and Kessler (2001, 2007).\n The results only partially point towards an Altaic family: Mongolian and Manchu\n show significant sound correspondences, while Turkish and Mongolian show some\n marginally significant phonological similarity, that might however be the consequence of areal\n contact. Crucially, Turkish and Manchu do not test positively under any\n condition.1\n","PeriodicalId":44637,"journal":{"name":"Diachronica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diachronica","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.17007.ceo","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Historical linguists have been debating for decades about whether the classical comparative method provides sufficient evidence to consider Altaic languages as part of a single genetic unity, like Indo-European and Uralic, or whether the implicit statistical robustness behind regular sound correspondences is lacking in the case of Altaic. In this paper, I run a significance test on Swadesh-lists representing Turkish, Mongolian and Manchu to see if there are regular patterns of phonetic similarities or correspondences among word-initial phonemes in the basic vocabulary that cannot be expected to have arisen by chance. The methodology draws on Oswalt (1970), Ringe (1992), Baxter & Manaster Ramer (2000) and Kessler (2001, 2007). The results only partially point towards an Altaic family: Mongolian and Manchu show significant sound correspondences, while Turkish and Mongolian show some marginally significant phonological similarity, that might however be the consequence of areal contact. Crucially, Turkish and Manchu do not test positively under any condition.1
阿尔泰语系的显著性检验
几十年来,历史语言学家一直在争论,经典的比较方法是否提供了足够的证据来将阿尔泰语系视为单一基因统一的一部分,如印欧语系和乌拉尔语系,或者在阿尔泰语系的情况下,规则发音对应背后是否缺乏隐含的统计稳健性。在本文中,我对代表土耳其语、蒙古语和满语的Swadesh表进行了显著性测试,以了解在基本词汇中,单词首音素之间是否存在不可能偶然出现的语音相似或对应的规则模式。该方法借鉴了Oswalt(1970)、Ringe(1992)、Baxter和Manaster Ramer(2000)以及Kessler(20012007)。结果仅部分指向阿尔泰语系:蒙古语和满语显示出显著的声音对应,而土耳其语和蒙古语显示出一些略微显著的语音相似性,但这可能是区域接触的结果。至关重要的是,土耳其语和满语在任何情况下都不会呈阳性。1
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diachronica
Diachronica Multiple-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Diachronica provides a forum for the presentation and discussion of information concerning all aspects of language change in any and all languages of the globe. Contributions which combine theoretical interest and philological acumen are especially welcome. Diachronica appears three times per year, publishing articles, review articles, book reviews, and a miscellanea section including notes, reports and discussions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信