Diagnostic Value of Trabecular Bone Score in Osteoporosis

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
A. Rajaei, Khatereh Mohammadi, Mahbobeh Oroei, F. Farsad
{"title":"Diagnostic Value of Trabecular Bone Score in Osteoporosis","authors":"A. Rajaei, Khatereh Mohammadi, Mahbobeh Oroei, F. Farsad","doi":"10.5812/iranjradiol-131845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Osteoporosis is a common chronic disease that can cause fractures and other complications. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment of this disease can reduce the risk of fracture. The trabecular bone score (TBS) is a valuable tool for evaluating bone microarchitecture in patients with osteoporosis. Objectives: The present study aimed to evaluate the association of TBS score with bone mineral density (BMD) as the gold standard in patients with osteoporosis. Patients and Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on 254 patients admitted to Resalat Hospital in Tehran, Iran. The BMD and TBS were concurrently evaluated, and TBS validity for osteoporosis diagnosis was assessed based on BMD as the gold standard. The agreement between TBS and BMD results was measured using the kappa statistic. All analyses were performed in MedCalc version 18.11.3.8 and SPSS version 18, and the level of statistical significance was set at < 0.05. Results: In this study, the majority of the patients were female (88.2%) and younger than 65 years (63.0%). Osteopenia and osteoporosis were diagnosed in 42.1% and 18.9% of the patients, respectively. The sensitivity of TBS for diagnosing osteoporosis versus osteopenia and osteopenia versus a normal status was higher in patients aged ≥ 65 years compared to those aged < 65 years (63.33% vs. 27.78% and 86.66% vs. 63.63%, respectively). Overall, TBS demonstrated a high diagnostic ability for differentiating osteoporosis versus normal BMD (AUC = 0.911, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Based on the findings, TBS alone is not sufficient for diagnosing osteoporosis and cannot replace BMD. Therefore, a combination of BMD and TBS techniques can be the best approach for diagnosing osteoporosis, especially in patients aged ≥ 65 years.","PeriodicalId":50273,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol-131845","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Osteoporosis is a common chronic disease that can cause fractures and other complications. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment of this disease can reduce the risk of fracture. The trabecular bone score (TBS) is a valuable tool for evaluating bone microarchitecture in patients with osteoporosis. Objectives: The present study aimed to evaluate the association of TBS score with bone mineral density (BMD) as the gold standard in patients with osteoporosis. Patients and Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on 254 patients admitted to Resalat Hospital in Tehran, Iran. The BMD and TBS were concurrently evaluated, and TBS validity for osteoporosis diagnosis was assessed based on BMD as the gold standard. The agreement between TBS and BMD results was measured using the kappa statistic. All analyses were performed in MedCalc version 18.11.3.8 and SPSS version 18, and the level of statistical significance was set at < 0.05. Results: In this study, the majority of the patients were female (88.2%) and younger than 65 years (63.0%). Osteopenia and osteoporosis were diagnosed in 42.1% and 18.9% of the patients, respectively. The sensitivity of TBS for diagnosing osteoporosis versus osteopenia and osteopenia versus a normal status was higher in patients aged ≥ 65 years compared to those aged < 65 years (63.33% vs. 27.78% and 86.66% vs. 63.63%, respectively). Overall, TBS demonstrated a high diagnostic ability for differentiating osteoporosis versus normal BMD (AUC = 0.911, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Based on the findings, TBS alone is not sufficient for diagnosing osteoporosis and cannot replace BMD. Therefore, a combination of BMD and TBS techniques can be the best approach for diagnosing osteoporosis, especially in patients aged ≥ 65 years.
小梁骨评分对骨质疏松症的诊断价值
背景:骨质疏松症是一种常见的慢性疾病,可引起骨折等并发症。这种疾病的早期诊断和及时治疗可以降低骨折的风险。骨小梁评分(TBS)是评估骨质疏松症患者骨微结构的一种有价值的工具。目的:本研究旨在评估TBS评分与骨密度(BMD)的相关性,骨密度是骨质疏松症患者的金标准。患者和方法:这项横断面研究对伊朗德黑兰Resalat医院的254名患者进行。同时评估骨密度和TBS,并以骨密度为金标准评估TBS对骨质疏松症诊断的有效性。使用kappa统计量测量TBS和BMD结果之间的一致性。所有分析均在MedCalc 18.11.3.8版和SPSS 18版中进行,统计学显著性水平设置为<0.05。结果:本研究中,大多数患者为女性(88.2%)和65岁以下(63.0%),骨质疏松症和骨质疏松症的诊断率分别为42.1%和18.9%。TBS诊断骨质疏松症与骨质减少症和骨质减少症与正常状态的敏感性在≥65岁的患者中高于<65岁的人群(分别为63.33%对27.78%和86.66%对63.63%)。总的来说,TBS在区分骨质疏松症和正常BMD方面表现出很高的诊断能力(AUC=0.911,P<0.001)。结论:根据研究结果,单独的TBS不足以诊断骨质疏松症,不能取代BMD。因此,骨密度和TBS技术的结合可能是诊断骨质疏松症的最佳方法,尤其是在年龄≥65岁的患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Radiology
Iranian Journal of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Iranian Journal of Radiology is the official journal of Tehran University of Medical Sciences and the Iranian Society of Radiology. It is a scientific forum dedicated primarily to the topics relevant to radiology and allied sciences of the developing countries, which have been neglected or have received little attention in the Western medical literature. This journal particularly welcomes manuscripts which deal with radiology and imaging from geographic regions wherein problems regarding economic, social, ethnic and cultural parameters affecting prevalence and course of the illness are taken into consideration. The Iranian Journal of Radiology has been launched in order to interchange information in the field of radiology and other related scientific spheres. In accordance with the objective of developing the scientific ability of the radiological population and other related scientific fields, this journal publishes research articles, evidence-based review articles, and case reports focused on regional tropics. Iranian Journal of Radiology operates in agreement with the below principles in compliance with continuous quality improvement: 1-Increasing the satisfaction of the readers, authors, staff, and co-workers. 2-Improving the scientific content and appearance of the journal. 3-Advancing the scientific validity of the journal both nationally and internationally. Such basics are accomplished only by aggregative effort and reciprocity of the radiological population and related sciences, authorities, and staff of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信