Right-wing and populist support for climate mitigation policies: Evidence from Poland and its carbon-intensive Silesia region

Q1 Social Sciences
Mahir Yazar , Lukas Hermwille , Håvard Haarstad
{"title":"Right-wing and populist support for climate mitigation policies: Evidence from Poland and its carbon-intensive Silesia region","authors":"Mahir Yazar ,&nbsp;Lukas Hermwille ,&nbsp;Håvard Haarstad","doi":"10.1016/j.regsus.2022.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Research on environmental behaviour is often overlooked in literature on regime destabilization in energy transitions. This study addresses that gap by focusing on socio-political and demographic factors shaping support for carbon regime destabilization policies in one of the most carbon-intensive regions of Europe. Carbon-intensive industries, especially coal mining and coal-based power generation, are often concentrated in a few carbon-intensive regions. Therefore, decarbonization actions will affect those regions particularly strongly. Correspondingly, carbon-intensive regions often exert significant political influence on the two climate mitigation policies at the national level. Focusing on Poland, we investigate socio-political and demographic factors that correlate with the approval or rejection of the two climate mitigation policies: increasing taxes on fossil fuels such as oil, gas, and coal and using public money to subsidize renewable energy such as wind and solar power in Poland and its carbon-intensive Silesia region. Using logistic regression with individual-level data derived from the 2016 European Social Survey (ESS) and the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey (CHES), we find party-political ideology to be an important predictor at the national level but much less so at the regional level. Specifically, voting for right-wing party is not a divisive factor for individual support of the two climate mitigation policies either nationally or regionally. More interestingly, populism is a strong factor in support of increasing taxes on fossil fuel in the carbon-intensive Silesia region but is less important concerning in support of using public money to subsidize renewable energy in Poland overall. These results show the heterogeneity of right-wing party and populism within the support for the two climate mitigation policies. Socio-demographic factors, especially age, gender, education level, employment status, and employment sector, have even more complex and heterogeneous components in support of the two climate mitigation policies at the national and regional levels. Identifying the complex socio-political and demographic factors of climate mitigation policies across different national versus carbon-intensive regional contexts is an essential step for generating <em>in situ</em> decarbonization strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34395,"journal":{"name":"Regional Sustainability","volume":"3 4","pages":"Pages 281-293"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666660X22000639/pdfft?md5=5a8fa88f6c3c2b74f0a4083d492908ea&pid=1-s2.0-S2666660X22000639-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666660X22000639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Research on environmental behaviour is often overlooked in literature on regime destabilization in energy transitions. This study addresses that gap by focusing on socio-political and demographic factors shaping support for carbon regime destabilization policies in one of the most carbon-intensive regions of Europe. Carbon-intensive industries, especially coal mining and coal-based power generation, are often concentrated in a few carbon-intensive regions. Therefore, decarbonization actions will affect those regions particularly strongly. Correspondingly, carbon-intensive regions often exert significant political influence on the two climate mitigation policies at the national level. Focusing on Poland, we investigate socio-political and demographic factors that correlate with the approval or rejection of the two climate mitigation policies: increasing taxes on fossil fuels such as oil, gas, and coal and using public money to subsidize renewable energy such as wind and solar power in Poland and its carbon-intensive Silesia region. Using logistic regression with individual-level data derived from the 2016 European Social Survey (ESS) and the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey (CHES), we find party-political ideology to be an important predictor at the national level but much less so at the regional level. Specifically, voting for right-wing party is not a divisive factor for individual support of the two climate mitigation policies either nationally or regionally. More interestingly, populism is a strong factor in support of increasing taxes on fossil fuel in the carbon-intensive Silesia region but is less important concerning in support of using public money to subsidize renewable energy in Poland overall. These results show the heterogeneity of right-wing party and populism within the support for the two climate mitigation policies. Socio-demographic factors, especially age, gender, education level, employment status, and employment sector, have even more complex and heterogeneous components in support of the two climate mitigation policies at the national and regional levels. Identifying the complex socio-political and demographic factors of climate mitigation policies across different national versus carbon-intensive regional contexts is an essential step for generating in situ decarbonization strategies.

右翼和民粹主义者对气候缓解政策的支持:来自波兰及其碳密集型西里西亚地区的证据
环境行为的研究往往被忽视的文献中政权不稳定的能量转换。本研究通过关注社会政治和人口因素来解决这一差距,这些因素影响了欧洲碳密度最高的地区之一对碳制度不稳定政策的支持。碳密集型工业,特别是煤炭开采和以煤为基础的发电,往往集中在少数碳密集型地区。因此,脱碳行动将特别强烈地影响这些地区。相应的,碳密集地区往往在国家层面上对两项气候减缓政策施加重大的政治影响。以波兰为重点,我们调查了与批准或拒绝两项气候减缓政策相关的社会政治和人口因素:增加对石油、天然气和煤炭等化石燃料的税收,并利用公共资金补贴波兰及其碳密集型西里西亚地区的风能和太阳能等可再生能源。利用2016年欧洲社会调查(ESS)和2014年教堂山专家调查(CHES)得出的个人层面数据的逻辑回归,我们发现政党政治意识形态在国家层面上是一个重要的预测因素,但在地区层面上的作用要小得多。具体来说,投票给右翼政党并不是个人支持两项国家或地区气候减缓政策的分裂因素。更有趣的是,在碳密集的西里西亚地区,民粹主义是支持增加化石燃料税的重要因素,但在支持使用公共资金补贴波兰整体可再生能源方面,民粹主义则不那么重要。这些结果表明,右翼政党和民粹主义对两种气候减缓政策的支持存在异质性。社会人口因素,特别是年龄、性别、教育水平、就业状况和就业部门,在支持国家和区域两级减缓气候变化政策方面具有更加复杂和异质的组成部分。确定不同国家与碳密集区域背景下气候缓解政策的复杂社会政治和人口因素,是制定就地脱碳战略的重要步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Regional Sustainability
Regional Sustainability Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信