Gender responsive budgeting: a crucial part of the toolkit for the implementation of gender sensitive laws?

IF 1.5 Q1 LAW

Theory and Practice of Legislation Pub Date : 2022-09-02 DOI:10.1080/20508840.2022.2138375

J. Veitch

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Theory of gender mainstreaming and links to GRB. What is gender responsive budgeting and why it is important. Laws that include specific requirements for implementation including budgets. Laws that do not require budgets. What does this mean for implementation? Gender responsive budgeting assists in the implementation of legislation by ensuring that inclusive resources are provided and also by helping to situate legislation within a gender responsive economic framing. Some UK examples (labour laws and childcare; the gender gap in income over the lifetime, and access to justice; costs of violence against women and girls) demonstrating the link between effective legislation and gender budget analysis.

查看原文本刊更多论文

促进性别平等的预算编制：执行对性别问题有敏感认识的法律的工具包的关键部分？

性别主流化理论及其与GRB的联系摘要。什么是促进性别平等的预算编制，以及为什么它很重要。包括预算在内的具体实施要求的法律。不需要预算的法律。这对实施意味着什么？促进性别平等的预算编制有助于立法的实施，确保提供包容性资源，并帮助将立法置于促进性别平等经济框架内。英国的一些例子（劳动法和儿童保育；终生收入的性别差距，以及诉诸司法的机会；暴力侵害妇女和女孩的成本）表明了有效立法与性别预算分析之间的联系。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Theory and Practice of Legislation LAW-

CiteScore

4.50

自引率

10.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Theory and Practice of Legislation aims to offer an international and interdisciplinary forum for the examination of legislation. The focus of the journal, which succeeds the former title Legisprudence, remains with legislation in its broadest sense. Legislation is seen as both process and product, reflection of theoretical assumptions and a skill. The journal addresses formal legislation, and its alternatives (such as covenants, regulation by non-state actors etc.). The editors welcome articles on systematic (as opposed to historical) issues, including drafting techniques, the introduction of open standards, evidence-based drafting, pre- and post-legislative scrutiny for effectiveness and efficiency, the utility and necessity of codification, IT in legislation, the legitimacy of legislation in view of fundamental principles and rights, law and language, and the link between legislator and judge. Comparative and interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged. But dogmatic descriptions of positive law are outside the scope of the journal. The journal offers a combination of themed issues and general issues. All articles are submitted to double blind review.