“Why do I have to do this? And why not?” Institutions, integrity, and citizenship under threat

IF 0.2 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Joseph Triest
{"title":"“Why do I have to do this? And why not?” Institutions, integrity, and citizenship under threat","authors":"Joseph Triest","doi":"10.33212/osd.v22n1.2022.115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ed Shapiro’s important and thought-provoking article deals with civic ethics and is organised around three critical points: a call (1) for taking personal authority in order to protect the group from (what is perceived as) its destructors (Why do I have to do this?); an offer for (2) doing it by being emphatic with the “enemy” (in what way is he right?); and (3) encouragement to reveal “active citizenship”.\nThe discussion challenges those questions by asking: Do I have to do this?Always? And why me? Do I have to understand the other? Always? Under what conditions? And is it really possible, taking into account our unconscious attitudes towards “otherness”? The discussion refers to the timing and the sociopolitical con-text of Shapiro’s article—namely turbulent times and a deep disappointment of present-day leadership—and interprets his challenge as a call for the return of the individual almost as a “Nietzschean hero”—namely, to differentiate him/herself even from the group-as-a-whole. Some unconscious aspects of the challenge which Ed Shapiro puts before us are discussed, referring to the inherent tension between “what should be” and “what is actually happening”.","PeriodicalId":41413,"journal":{"name":"Organisational and Social Dynamics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organisational and Social Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33212/osd.v22n1.2022.115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ed Shapiro’s important and thought-provoking article deals with civic ethics and is organised around three critical points: a call (1) for taking personal authority in order to protect the group from (what is perceived as) its destructors (Why do I have to do this?); an offer for (2) doing it by being emphatic with the “enemy” (in what way is he right?); and (3) encouragement to reveal “active citizenship”. The discussion challenges those questions by asking: Do I have to do this?Always? And why me? Do I have to understand the other? Always? Under what conditions? And is it really possible, taking into account our unconscious attitudes towards “otherness”? The discussion refers to the timing and the sociopolitical con-text of Shapiro’s article—namely turbulent times and a deep disappointment of present-day leadership—and interprets his challenge as a call for the return of the individual almost as a “Nietzschean hero”—namely, to differentiate him/herself even from the group-as-a-whole. Some unconscious aspects of the challenge which Ed Shapiro puts before us are discussed, referring to the inherent tension between “what should be” and “what is actually happening”.
“为什么我必须这样做?为什么不呢?”制度、诚信和公民身份受到威胁
Ed Shapiro的这篇重要而发人深省的文章涉及公民道德,并围绕三个关键点进行组织:呼吁(1)行使个人权力,以保护群体免受(被视为)其破坏者的伤害(为什么我必须这样做?);提议(2)通过强调“敌人”来做到这一点(他在什么方面是对的?);以及(3)鼓励揭示“积极的公民身份”。讨论通过问:我必须这样做吗?总是为什么是我?我必须理解另一个吗?总是在什么条件下?考虑到我们对“另类”的无意识态度,这真的有可能吗?讨论提到了夏皮罗文章的时机和社会政治内容,即动荡的时代和对当今领导层的深深失望,并将他的挑战解释为呼吁个人回归,几乎是“尼采英雄”,即将他/她自己与整个群体区分开来。讨论了Ed Shapiro摆在我们面前的挑战的一些无意识方面,指的是“应该是什么”和“实际发生了什么”之间固有的紧张关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Organisational and Social Dynamics
Organisational and Social Dynamics PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: O&SD aims to create a deeper understanding of organisational and social processes and their effects on individuals, and to provide a forum for both theoretical and applied papers addressing emerging issues in societies and organisations from a psycho-social perspective. The editors seek to sustain a creative tension between scientific rigour and popular appeal, by developing conversations with the professional and social scientific worlds and opening them to practitioners and reflective citizens everywhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信