Evaluating the Impact of [BlindedMethodName] on Learning Analytics Knowledge Creation and Acceptance during Multidisciplinary, Co-Design of Learning Activities

Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.55612/s-5002-055-001
Marcel Schmitz, Maren Scheffel, Roger Bemelmans, H. Drachsler
{"title":"Evaluating the Impact of [BlindedMethodName] on Learning Analytics Knowledge Creation and Acceptance during Multidisciplinary, Co-Design of Learning Activities","authors":"Marcel Schmitz, Maren Scheffel, Roger Bemelmans, H. Drachsler","doi":"10.55612/s-5002-055-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learning analytics offers opportunities to enhance the design of learning activities by providing information on the impact of different learning designs. Despite the availability of design methods that aim to facilitate the integration of learning analytics in learning design, there is a lack of research evaluating their effectiveness. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of the FoLA2 method. Sixty participants utilized the FoLA2 method to create fourteen learning activities in higher education settings. To measure the impact, participants completed a technology acceptance test both before and after each session. Additionally, the researchers analyzed audio recordings of the sessions using epistemic network analysis to gain insights into the discussions surrounding learning analytics and the design of enriched learning activities. The results of both the technology acceptance test and the epistemic network analysis indicated that the FoLA2 method effectively supports the integration of learning analytics during the design of learning activities.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-055-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Learning analytics offers opportunities to enhance the design of learning activities by providing information on the impact of different learning designs. Despite the availability of design methods that aim to facilitate the integration of learning analytics in learning design, there is a lack of research evaluating their effectiveness. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of the FoLA2 method. Sixty participants utilized the FoLA2 method to create fourteen learning activities in higher education settings. To measure the impact, participants completed a technology acceptance test both before and after each session. Additionally, the researchers analyzed audio recordings of the sessions using epistemic network analysis to gain insights into the discussions surrounding learning analytics and the design of enriched learning activities. The results of both the technology acceptance test and the epistemic network analysis indicated that the FoLA2 method effectively supports the integration of learning analytics during the design of learning activities.
分享
查看原文
评估[盲法名称]对学习分析的影响在多学科、共同设计学习活动中知识的创造和接受
学习分析通过提供不同学习设计的影响信息,提供了加强学习活动设计的机会。尽管设计方法旨在促进学习分析在学习设计中的集成,但缺乏评估其有效性的研究。本研究旨在评估FoLA2方法的有效性。60名参与者使用FoLA2方法在高等教育环境中创建了14项学习活动。为了衡量影响,参与者在每次会议前后都完成了技术验收测试。此外,研究人员使用认知网络分析分析了会议的录音,以深入了解围绕学习分析和丰富学习活动设计的讨论。技术接受测试和认知网络分析的结果表明,FoLA2方法有效地支持了学习活动设计过程中学习分析的集成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信