Pilots’ Willingness to Operate in Urban Air Mobility Integrated Airspace: A Moderated Mediation Analysis

IF 1.3 Q3 REMOTE SENSING
L. Vempati, Sabrina Woods, S. Winter
{"title":"Pilots’ Willingness to Operate in Urban Air Mobility Integrated Airspace: A Moderated Mediation Analysis","authors":"L. Vempati, Sabrina Woods, S. Winter","doi":"10.1139/juvs-2021-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interest in advanced air mobility (AAM) and urban air mobility (UAM) operations for on-demand passenger and cargo transport continues to grow. There is ongoing research on market demand and forecast, community acceptance, privacy, and security. There is also ongoing research by NASA, FAA, academia, and industry on airspace integration, regulatory, process, and procedural challenges. Safe integration of UAM and AAM will also require different stakeholder perspectives such as air traffic controllers, manned aircraft pilots, remote pilots, UAM operators, and the community. This research aimed to assess the willingness of manned aircraft pilots to operate in UAM integrated airspace based on airspace complexity and UAM automation level. In addition, a moderated mediation analysis was conducted using trust and perceived risk as mediators and operator type as a moderating variable. The results indicated that automation level influenced pilots’ willingness to operate an aircraft in integrated airspace. A moderating effect of operation type on automation level and willingness to pilot an aircraft was also observed: professional pilots were more amenable to UAM operations with a pilot on-board compared to remotely piloted operations. Results from the study are expected to inform airspace integration challenges, processes, and procedures for UAM integrated operations.","PeriodicalId":45619,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/juvs-2021-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Interest in advanced air mobility (AAM) and urban air mobility (UAM) operations for on-demand passenger and cargo transport continues to grow. There is ongoing research on market demand and forecast, community acceptance, privacy, and security. There is also ongoing research by NASA, FAA, academia, and industry on airspace integration, regulatory, process, and procedural challenges. Safe integration of UAM and AAM will also require different stakeholder perspectives such as air traffic controllers, manned aircraft pilots, remote pilots, UAM operators, and the community. This research aimed to assess the willingness of manned aircraft pilots to operate in UAM integrated airspace based on airspace complexity and UAM automation level. In addition, a moderated mediation analysis was conducted using trust and perceived risk as mediators and operator type as a moderating variable. The results indicated that automation level influenced pilots’ willingness to operate an aircraft in integrated airspace. A moderating effect of operation type on automation level and willingness to pilot an aircraft was also observed: professional pilots were more amenable to UAM operations with a pilot on-board compared to remotely piloted operations. Results from the study are expected to inform airspace integration challenges, processes, and procedures for UAM integrated operations.
飞行员在城市空中机动综合空域的操作意愿:一个有调节的中介分析
对用于按需客运和货运的先进空中机动(AAM)和城市空中机动(UAM)运营的兴趣持续增长。目前正在对市场需求和预测、社区接受度、隐私和安全进行研究。美国国家航空航天局、美国联邦航空管理局、学术界和工业界也在对空域整合、监管、流程和程序挑战进行研究。无人机和AAM的安全集成还需要不同的利益相关者视角,如空中交通管制员、有人驾驶飞机飞行员、远程飞行员、无人机操作员和社区。本研究旨在基于空域复杂性和无人机自动化水平,评估有人驾驶飞机飞行员在无人机集成空域中操作的意愿。此外,使用信任和感知风险作为中介,操作员类型作为调节变量,进行了调节中介分析。结果表明,自动化水平影响飞行员在综合空域操作飞机的意愿。还观察到操作类型对自动化水平和驾驶飞机意愿的调节作用:与远程驾驶操作相比,专业飞行员更愿意在有飞行员的情况下进行无人机操作。该研究的结果有望为无人机综合作战的空域一体化挑战、过程和程序提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信