National Truth Commission in Brazil: the Thread of History and the Right to Memory and Truth

Ramon Rebouças Nolasco de Oliveira, R. Cabral
{"title":"National Truth Commission in Brazil: the Thread of History and the Right to Memory and Truth","authors":"Ramon Rebouças Nolasco de Oliveira, R. Cabral","doi":"10.22395/ojum.v20n43a4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article aims to problematize the issues of memory and Transitional Justice from the context of the establishment of the Brazilian National Truth Commission – (CNV, in Portuguese). The disputes about what to remember, how to remember, and what to forget (or not to forget) can become very complex in times of political polarization. By problematizing the Brazilian case between 2008 and 2014, we seek to highlight how the institution path of the CNV dealt with legislative and empirical obstacles around memory, history, forgetting, and resentment. Methodologically, the research used primary sources (legislative and judicial documents, reports, opinions) and secondary sources (specialized literature on the subject). Using the descriptive method, we present the Brazilian transitional context and the course of the CNV to demonstrate how the tension between resentment and the right to memory and the right to truth were organized by the Commission. While the outcome of the CNV Report is relevant, the accountability of human rights violators in Brazil is neutralized by the justice system. The promise of a public policy on memory remains in oblivion controlled by political elites.","PeriodicalId":30109,"journal":{"name":"Opinion Juridica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Opinion Juridica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22395/ojum.v20n43a4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article aims to problematize the issues of memory and Transitional Justice from the context of the establishment of the Brazilian National Truth Commission – (CNV, in Portuguese). The disputes about what to remember, how to remember, and what to forget (or not to forget) can become very complex in times of political polarization. By problematizing the Brazilian case between 2008 and 2014, we seek to highlight how the institution path of the CNV dealt with legislative and empirical obstacles around memory, history, forgetting, and resentment. Methodologically, the research used primary sources (legislative and judicial documents, reports, opinions) and secondary sources (specialized literature on the subject). Using the descriptive method, we present the Brazilian transitional context and the course of the CNV to demonstrate how the tension between resentment and the right to memory and the right to truth were organized by the Commission. While the outcome of the CNV Report is relevant, the accountability of human rights violators in Brazil is neutralized by the justice system. The promise of a public policy on memory remains in oblivion controlled by political elites.
巴西国家真相委员会:历史脉络与记忆与真相权
本文旨在从巴西国家真相委员会(CNV,葡萄牙语)成立的背景下,对记忆和过渡时期司法问题提出质疑。在政治两极分化的时代,关于记住什么、如何记住以及忘记(或不忘记)什么的争论可能会变得非常复杂。通过对2008年至2014年间巴西案件的质疑,我们试图强调CNV的制度路径是如何处理记忆、历史、遗忘和怨恨方面的立法和经验障碍的。在方法上,研究使用了主要来源(立法和司法文件、报告、意见)和次要来源(有关该主题的专门文献)。使用描述性方法,我们介绍了巴西的过渡背景和CNV的过程,以证明委员会是如何组织怨恨与记忆权和了解真相权之间的紧张关系的。虽然国家电视台报告的结果是相关的,但巴西侵犯人权者的责任被司法系统所抵消。在政治精英的控制下,关于记忆的公共政策的承诺仍然被遗忘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信