Green tea might be effective in alleviating COVID-19 associated psychiatric complications: preliminary results from a pilot randomized controlled trial
M. Mahdavi-Roshan, A. Salari, Eshagh Mohammadyari, Tofigh Yaghubi Kalurazi, A. Pourkazemi, Azin Vakilpour, M. Rahbar Taramsari, Zeinab Ghorbani
{"title":"Green tea might be effective in alleviating COVID-19 associated psychiatric complications: preliminary results from a pilot randomized controlled trial","authors":"M. Mahdavi-Roshan, A. Salari, Eshagh Mohammadyari, Tofigh Yaghubi Kalurazi, A. Pourkazemi, Azin Vakilpour, M. Rahbar Taramsari, Zeinab Ghorbani","doi":"10.1108/nfs-08-2021-0258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nIt is argued that COVID-19 patients show various neuropsychiatric symptoms, including fatigue, depression and anxiety. On the other hand, epidemiological and experimental evidence indicated that green tea could potentially have antiviral effects and ameliorate psychiatric disorders. However, there is a lack of clinical evidence. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether drinking green tea can clinically improve psychiatric complications of COVID-19 infection.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study included 40 patients with laboratory confirmed mild-to-moderate COVID-19 disorder in the current randomized open-label controlled trial. Patients were instructed to include three cups/day of green tea (intervention) or black tea (control) to their usual diet for four weeks immediately after diagnosis of the disease. At the study baseline and after the intervention, the enrolled patients’ fatigue, depression and anxiety were assessed by the Chalder Fatigue Scale, Beck Depression Inventory-Fast Screen and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory questionnaires.\n\n\nFindings\nA total of 19 COVID-19 cases in the intervention group (mean age = 52 years) and 14 cases (mean age = 50 years) in the control group completed the study. Analysis of covariance adjusted for baseline levels, and confounders revealed that those who consumed three cups/day of green tea compared to the patients who received black tea experienced significantly lower fatigue, depression and state and trait anxiety levels (adjusted means for fatigue = 12.3 vs 16.2 (P = 0.03), depression = 0.53 vs 1.8 (P = 0.01), 37.4 vs 45.5 (P < 0.01) and 37.9 vs 45.2 (P < 0.01)).\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe open-label design may bias the evaluation of the self-reported status of fatigue, depression or anxiety as the main outcomes assessed. Moreover, as this study did not include patients with severe COVID-19, this might affect the generalizability of the present results. Thus, the recommendation of daily drinking green tea may be limited to the subjects diagnosed with mild-to-moderate type of infection or those with long-term neuropsychiatric complications owing to COVID-19. Besides, considering the ethical issues, this study could not exclude the drug therapy’s confounding effects; thereby, this point should be considered when interpreting the current results. Besides, it is worth noting that Guilan province in the north of Iran is recognized as a tea (and particularly green tea) producing region; thereby, it is an available and relatively inexpensive product. Considering this issue, the recommendation to consume this medicinal plant in adjunct to the routine treatment approach among patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 based on its beneficial effects may be widely accepted.\n\n\nPractical implications\nGreen tea consumption could be considered an option to combat COVID-19 associated psychological complications, including fatigue, depression and anxiety among patients suffering from mild-to-moderate type of this viral infection.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, in this study, for the first time, the effects of green tea compared to black tea on COVID-19 associated fatigue, depression and anxiety status within an open-label controlled trial have been investigated.\n","PeriodicalId":19376,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition & Food Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition & Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/nfs-08-2021-0258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
It is argued that COVID-19 patients show various neuropsychiatric symptoms, including fatigue, depression and anxiety. On the other hand, epidemiological and experimental evidence indicated that green tea could potentially have antiviral effects and ameliorate psychiatric disorders. However, there is a lack of clinical evidence. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether drinking green tea can clinically improve psychiatric complications of COVID-19 infection.
Design/methodology/approach
This study included 40 patients with laboratory confirmed mild-to-moderate COVID-19 disorder in the current randomized open-label controlled trial. Patients were instructed to include three cups/day of green tea (intervention) or black tea (control) to their usual diet for four weeks immediately after diagnosis of the disease. At the study baseline and after the intervention, the enrolled patients’ fatigue, depression and anxiety were assessed by the Chalder Fatigue Scale, Beck Depression Inventory-Fast Screen and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory questionnaires.
Findings
A total of 19 COVID-19 cases in the intervention group (mean age = 52 years) and 14 cases (mean age = 50 years) in the control group completed the study. Analysis of covariance adjusted for baseline levels, and confounders revealed that those who consumed three cups/day of green tea compared to the patients who received black tea experienced significantly lower fatigue, depression and state and trait anxiety levels (adjusted means for fatigue = 12.3 vs 16.2 (P = 0.03), depression = 0.53 vs 1.8 (P = 0.01), 37.4 vs 45.5 (P < 0.01) and 37.9 vs 45.2 (P < 0.01)).
Research limitations/implications
The open-label design may bias the evaluation of the self-reported status of fatigue, depression or anxiety as the main outcomes assessed. Moreover, as this study did not include patients with severe COVID-19, this might affect the generalizability of the present results. Thus, the recommendation of daily drinking green tea may be limited to the subjects diagnosed with mild-to-moderate type of infection or those with long-term neuropsychiatric complications owing to COVID-19. Besides, considering the ethical issues, this study could not exclude the drug therapy’s confounding effects; thereby, this point should be considered when interpreting the current results. Besides, it is worth noting that Guilan province in the north of Iran is recognized as a tea (and particularly green tea) producing region; thereby, it is an available and relatively inexpensive product. Considering this issue, the recommendation to consume this medicinal plant in adjunct to the routine treatment approach among patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 based on its beneficial effects may be widely accepted.
Practical implications
Green tea consumption could be considered an option to combat COVID-19 associated psychological complications, including fatigue, depression and anxiety among patients suffering from mild-to-moderate type of this viral infection.
Originality/value
To the best of the authors’ knowledge, in this study, for the first time, the effects of green tea compared to black tea on COVID-19 associated fatigue, depression and anxiety status within an open-label controlled trial have been investigated.
目的新冠肺炎患者表现出各种神经精神症状,包括疲劳、抑郁和焦虑。另一方面,流行病学和实验证据表明,绿茶可能具有抗病毒作用,并改善精神疾病。然而,缺乏临床证据。本研究旨在探讨饮用绿茶是否能在临床上改善新冠肺炎感染的精神并发症。设计/方法/方法本研究在当前的随机开放对照试验中纳入了40名实验室确诊的轻度至中度新冠肺炎疾病患者。患者被要求在诊断出疾病后立即在日常饮食中加入三杯/天的绿茶(干预)或红茶(对照),持续四周。在研究基线和干预后,通过Chalder疲劳量表、Beck抑郁量表快速筛查和状态-特质焦虑量表问卷对入选患者的疲劳、抑郁和焦虑进行评估。结果干预组共有19例新冠肺炎病例(平均年龄=52岁)和对照组共有14例病例(平均岁=50岁)完成了研究。根据基线水平和混杂因素调整的协方差分析显示,与喝红茶的患者相比,每天喝三杯绿茶的患者的疲劳、抑郁、状态和特质焦虑水平显著降低(疲劳的调整平均值=12.3 vs 16.2(P=0.03),抑郁=0.53 vs 1.8(P=0.01),37.4 vs 45.5(P<0.01)和37.9 vs 45.2(P<0.01))。研究局限性/含义开放标签设计可能会使对疲劳、抑郁或焦虑自我报告状态的评估产生偏差,将其作为评估的主要结果。此外,由于这项研究不包括重症新冠肺炎患者,这可能会影响目前结果的可推广性。因此,每日饮用绿茶的建议可能仅限于被诊断为轻度至中度感染的受试者或因新冠肺炎而出现长期神经精神并发症的受试人员。此外,考虑到伦理问题,本研究不能排除药物治疗的混杂效应;因此,在解释当前结果时应考虑这一点。此外,值得注意的是,伊朗北部的吉兰省是公认的茶叶(尤其是绿茶)产区;因此,它是一种可用且相对便宜的产品。考虑到这一问题,基于其有益效果,建议在轻度至中度新冠肺炎患者的常规治疗方法之外食用这种药用植物可能会被广泛接受。实际意义饮用绿茶可被视为对抗新冠肺炎相关心理并发症的一种选择,包括轻度至中度这种病毒感染患者的疲劳、抑郁和焦虑。原创/价值据作者所知,在这项研究中,首次在一项开放对照试验中调查了绿茶与红茶对新冠肺炎相关疲劳、抑郁和焦虑状态的影响。
期刊介绍:
Nutrition & Food Science* (NFS) is an international, double blind peer-reviewed journal offering accessible and comprehensive coverage of food, beverage and nutrition research. The journal draws out the practical and social applications of research, demonstrates best practice through applied research and case studies and showcases innovative or controversial practices and points of view. The journal is an invaluable resource to inform individuals, organisations and the public on modern thinking, research and attitudes to food science and nutrition. NFS welcomes empirical and applied research, viewpoint papers, conceptual and technical papers, case studies, meta-analysis studies, literature reviews and general reviews which take a scientific approach to the following topics: -Attitudes to food and nutrition -Healthy eating/ nutritional public health initiatives, policies and legislation -Clinical and community nutrition and health (including public health and multiple or complex co-morbidities) -Nutrition in different cultural and ethnic groups -Nutrition during pregnancy, lactation, childhood, and young adult years -Nutrition for adults and older people -Nutrition in the workplace -Nutrition in lower and middle income countries (incl. comparisons with higher income countries) -Food science and technology, including food processing and microbiological quality -Genetically engineered foods -Food safety / quality, including chemical, physical and microbiological analysis of how these aspects effect health or nutritional quality of foodstuffs