Konstruksi Media Online Detik.com dan Kompas.com terhadap Vanuatu

IF 0.9 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Fikrihadi Kurnia, Shulfi Ana Helmi, Sunnah Dwi Rochmana
{"title":"Konstruksi Media Online Detik.com dan Kompas.com terhadap Vanuatu","authors":"Fikrihadi Kurnia, Shulfi Ana Helmi, Sunnah Dwi Rochmana","doi":"10.30659/JIKM.V9I1.13312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vanuatu is one of the Pacific Island countries that consistently raises the issue of alleged human rights violations in Papua at every opportunity at the UN session. On September 27, 2020, Vanuatu, represented by the Prime Minister of the Republic of Vanuatu, Bob Loughman, returned to address the issue related to human rights violations of the Papuan at the 75th UN session. Vanuatu's statement and its reply from the Indonesian diplomat, Sylvany Austin Pasaribu, at the 75th UN session became the spotlight of various media. Detik.com and Kompas.com as online media pioneers and one of the most frequently accessed news sites, were also reported that occurrence. This research aims to find out the differences between those media on packaging its report of Vanuatu after the issue of Papuan human rights violations was raised at the 75th UN General Assembly. The news period under research is from 27 September to 2 October 2020. This research uses qualitative research method with the Zhongdang Pan and Gerald M Kosicki framing analysis model. In this research, Detik.com was more likely to corner Vanuatu. This matter can be seen in terms of quantity and packaging of news. Meanwhile, Kompas.com, didn't put Vanuatu in an advantageous position, but was trying to show balance in its report.","PeriodicalId":45460,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information & Knowledge Management","volume":"9 1","pages":"29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information & Knowledge Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30659/JIKM.V9I1.13312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Vanuatu is one of the Pacific Island countries that consistently raises the issue of alleged human rights violations in Papua at every opportunity at the UN session. On September 27, 2020, Vanuatu, represented by the Prime Minister of the Republic of Vanuatu, Bob Loughman, returned to address the issue related to human rights violations of the Papuan at the 75th UN session. Vanuatu's statement and its reply from the Indonesian diplomat, Sylvany Austin Pasaribu, at the 75th UN session became the spotlight of various media. Detik.com and Kompas.com as online media pioneers and one of the most frequently accessed news sites, were also reported that occurrence. This research aims to find out the differences between those media on packaging its report of Vanuatu after the issue of Papuan human rights violations was raised at the 75th UN General Assembly. The news period under research is from 27 September to 2 October 2020. This research uses qualitative research method with the Zhongdang Pan and Gerald M Kosicki framing analysis model. In this research, Detik.com was more likely to corner Vanuatu. This matter can be seen in terms of quantity and packaging of news. Meanwhile, Kompas.com, didn't put Vanuatu in an advantageous position, but was trying to show balance in its report.
构建媒体在线Detik.com和Kompas.com对抗瓦努阿图
瓦努阿图是太平洋岛国之一,它在联合国会议上一有机会就不断提出巴布亚侵犯人权的指控。2020年9月27日,瓦努阿图共和国总理鲍勃·劳曼代表瓦努阿图在第75届联合国会议上返回,讨论巴布亚侵犯人权的问题。瓦努阿图的声明及其印尼外交官Sylvany Austin Pasaribu在第75届联合国会议上的答复成为了各种媒体的焦点。Detik.com和Kompas.com作为在线媒体的先驱和访问频率最高的新闻网站之一,也报道了这种情况。这项研究旨在找出在第75届联合国大会提出巴布亚侵犯人权问题后,这些媒体在包装瓦努阿图报道方面的差异。研究期间为2020年9月27日至10月2日。本研究采用定性研究方法,采用潘中当和Gerald M Kosicki框架分析模型。在这项研究中,Detik.com更有可能垄断瓦努阿图。这件事可以从新闻的数量和包装上看出来。与此同时,Kompas.com并没有让瓦努阿图处于有利地位,但试图在其报告中显示平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Information & Knowledge Management
Journal of Information & Knowledge Management INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: JIKM is a refereed journal published quarterly by World Scientific and dedicated to the exchange of the latest research and practical information in the field of information processing and knowledge management. The journal publishes original research and case studies by academic, business and government contributors on all aspects of information processing, information management, knowledge management, tools, techniques and technologies, knowledge creation and sharing, best practices, policies and guidelines. JIKM is an international journal aimed at providing quality information to subscribers around the world. Managed by an international editorial board, JIKM positions itself as one of the leading scholarly journals in the field of information processing and knowledge management. It is a good reference for both information and knowledge management professionals. The journal covers key areas in the field of information and knowledge management. Research papers, practical applications, working papers, and case studies are invited in the following areas: -Business intelligence and competitive intelligence -Communication and organizational culture -e-Learning and life long learning -Electronic records and document management -Information processing and information management -Information organization, taxonomies and ontology -Intellectual capital -Knowledge creation, retention, sharing and transfer -Knowledge discovery, data and text mining -Knowledge management and innovations -Knowledge management education -Knowledge management tools and technologies -Knowledge management measurements -Knowledge professionals and leadership -Learning organization and organizational learning -Practical implementations of knowledge management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信