A Mixed-method Study on the Bright Side of Organizational Change: Role Clarity and Supervisor Support as Resources for Employees’ Resilience

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Chiara Bernuzzi, V. Sommovigo, M. Maffoni, I. Setti, P. Argentero
{"title":"A Mixed-method Study on the Bright Side of Organizational Change: Role Clarity and Supervisor Support as Resources for Employees’ Resilience","authors":"Chiara Bernuzzi, V. Sommovigo, M. Maffoni, I. Setti, P. Argentero","doi":"10.1080/14697017.2023.2172057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This mixed-method study aims to analyze how and when employees’ perceptions of positive organizational change may be related to role clarity and resilience and conditional on supervisor support levels. A total of 40 employees participated in focus groups. Thematic analysis revealed that participants perceived differently organizational change, role, supervisor support, and resilience. A total of 178 employees completed questionnaires analyzing perceptions of organizational change, role clarity, resilience, and supervisor support. Quantitative analyses revealed that role clarity mediated the association between employees’ perceptions of positive organizational change and resilience. This relationship was enhanced by supervisor support. Overall, the results suggest that employees who positively perceive organizational change may more easily understand their new role and demands, which is positively related to their resilience. When employees perceive being supported by their supervisors, they are more likely to perceive themselves as resilient, even in the face of organizational change. Our results suggest that organizations should adopt a transparent change management communication plan based on employee involvement. MAD statement This study moves an important step forward in both the change management and resilience literature, as it is the first to examine the mechanisms and boundary conditions explaining how and when employees’ perceptions of positive organizational change may facilitate resilience. By adopting a positive psychology perspective and a mixed-method design, this study identifies role clarity and supervisor support as two important resources that allow employees to benefit from organizational change. As such, it would contribute to providing new insights on how employee resilience can be enabled during organizational change.","PeriodicalId":47003,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF CHANGE MANAGEMENT","volume":"23 1","pages":"143 - 176"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF CHANGE MANAGEMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2023.2172057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT This mixed-method study aims to analyze how and when employees’ perceptions of positive organizational change may be related to role clarity and resilience and conditional on supervisor support levels. A total of 40 employees participated in focus groups. Thematic analysis revealed that participants perceived differently organizational change, role, supervisor support, and resilience. A total of 178 employees completed questionnaires analyzing perceptions of organizational change, role clarity, resilience, and supervisor support. Quantitative analyses revealed that role clarity mediated the association between employees’ perceptions of positive organizational change and resilience. This relationship was enhanced by supervisor support. Overall, the results suggest that employees who positively perceive organizational change may more easily understand their new role and demands, which is positively related to their resilience. When employees perceive being supported by their supervisors, they are more likely to perceive themselves as resilient, even in the face of organizational change. Our results suggest that organizations should adopt a transparent change management communication plan based on employee involvement. MAD statement This study moves an important step forward in both the change management and resilience literature, as it is the first to examine the mechanisms and boundary conditions explaining how and when employees’ perceptions of positive organizational change may facilitate resilience. By adopting a positive psychology perspective and a mixed-method design, this study identifies role clarity and supervisor support as two important resources that allow employees to benefit from organizational change. As such, it would contribute to providing new insights on how employee resilience can be enabled during organizational change.
组织变革正面效应的混合方法研究:角色明晰和主管支持作为员工弹性的资源
摘要这项混合方法研究旨在分析员工对积极组织变革的感知如何以及何时与角色清晰度和弹性相关,并以主管支持水平为条件。共有40名员工参加了焦点小组。专题分析显示,参与者对组织变革、角色、主管支持和应变能力的感知不同。共有178名员工完成了问卷调查,分析了对组织变革、角色清晰性、应变能力和主管支持的看法。定量分析显示,角色清晰性介导了员工对积极组织变革的感知与韧性之间的联系。主管的支持加强了这种关系。总体而言,研究结果表明,积极感知组织变革的员工可能更容易理解他们的新角色和需求,这与他们的韧性呈正相关。当员工认为得到了主管的支持时,他们更有可能认为自己有韧性,即使面对组织变革也是如此。我们的研究结果表明,组织应该采用基于员工参与的透明变革管理沟通计划。MAD声明这项研究在变革管理和恢复力文献中迈出了重要的一步,因为它首次研究了解释员工对积极组织变革的感知如何以及何时可以促进恢复力的机制和边界条件。通过采用积极的心理学视角和混合方法设计,本研究将角色清晰性和主管支持确定为让员工从组织变革中受益的两种重要资源。因此,它将有助于提供关于如何在组织变革期间实现员工弹性的新见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Journal of Change Management is a multidisciplinary and international forum for critical, mainstream and alternative contributions - focusing as much on psychology, ethics, culture and behaviour as on structure and process. JCM is a platform for open and challenging dialogue and a thorough critique of established as well as alternative practices. JCM is aiming to provide all authors with a first decision within six weeks of submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信