Reviewers and Reviewees: Margaret Oliphant’s Literary Criticism and Mary Elizabeth Braddon’s Sensation Novels

IF 0.3 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Isabel Seidel, A. Moulds, Beth Gaskell, Porscha Fermanis, Priti Joshi, Jonathan Farina, K. Malone, Fionnuala Dillane, J. Codell, E. Liggins, Douglas A. Guerra, Kristin E. Kondrlik, Luke Seaber, Laurel Brake, Mark W. Turner, Nora Ramtke
{"title":"Reviewers and Reviewees: Margaret Oliphant’s Literary Criticism and Mary Elizabeth Braddon’s Sensation Novels","authors":"Isabel Seidel, A. Moulds, Beth Gaskell, Porscha Fermanis, Priti Joshi, Jonathan Farina, K. Malone, Fionnuala Dillane, J. Codell, E. Liggins, Douglas A. Guerra, Kristin E. Kondrlik, Luke Seaber, Laurel Brake, Mark W. Turner, Nora Ramtke","doi":"10.1353/vpr.2022.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:After Margaret Oliphant referred to Mary Elizabeth Braddon as the leader of the bigamy school of fiction in an 1867 Blackwood’s review, Braddon commissioned George Augustus Sala to write a riposte for her magazine, Belgravia. Scholars have explored the effect of Oliphant’s criticism on Braddon and Belgravia, but little attention has been paid to the fact that Oliphant responded directly to Sala’s accusations in her subsequent review articles in Blackwood’s. Taking the Braddon-Sala affair as a turning point in Oliphant’s literary criticism, this essay examines Oliphant’s review articles of the 1870s to demonstrate how the debate over sensation influenced her critical ethics.","PeriodicalId":44337,"journal":{"name":"Victorian Periodicals Review","volume":"55 1","pages":"155 - 175 - 176 - 200 - 201 - 216 - 217 - 236 - 237 - 256 - 257 - 273 - 274 - 293 - 294 - 297 - 297"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Victorian Periodicals Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/vpr.2022.0013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:After Margaret Oliphant referred to Mary Elizabeth Braddon as the leader of the bigamy school of fiction in an 1867 Blackwood’s review, Braddon commissioned George Augustus Sala to write a riposte for her magazine, Belgravia. Scholars have explored the effect of Oliphant’s criticism on Braddon and Belgravia, but little attention has been paid to the fact that Oliphant responded directly to Sala’s accusations in her subsequent review articles in Blackwood’s. Taking the Braddon-Sala affair as a turning point in Oliphant’s literary criticism, this essay examines Oliphant’s review articles of the 1870s to demonstrate how the debate over sensation influenced her critical ethics.
评论家与被评者:玛格丽特·奥列芬特的文学批评与玛丽·伊丽莎白·布莱登的感觉小说
摘要:玛格丽特·奥列芬特在1867年布莱克伍德的一篇评论中称玛丽·伊丽莎白·布雷登为小说重婚派的领袖后,布莱登委托乔治·奥古斯都·萨拉为她的杂志《贝尔格莱维亚》写了一篇回击文章。学者们已经探讨了奥列芬特的批评对布莱登和贝尔格莱维亚的影响,但很少注意到奥列芬顿在随后发表在布莱克伍德的评论文章中直接回应了萨拉的指控。本文以布莱登·萨拉事件为契机,考察了奥列芬特19世纪70年代的评论文章,以揭示关于感觉的争论如何影响她的批评伦理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Victorian Periodicals Review
Victorian Periodicals Review HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信