Oil palm production, instrumental and relational values: the public relations battle for hearts, heads, and hands along the value chain

IF 6.6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Betha Lusiana , Maja Slingerland , Andrew Miccolis , Ni’matul Khasanah , Beria Leimona , Meine van Noordwijk
{"title":"Oil palm production, instrumental and relational values: the public relations battle for hearts, heads, and hands along the value chain","authors":"Betha Lusiana ,&nbsp;Maja Slingerland ,&nbsp;Andrew Miccolis ,&nbsp;Ni’matul Khasanah ,&nbsp;Beria Leimona ,&nbsp;Meine van Noordwijk","doi":"10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the public debate on the expansion of oil palm production in tropical forest zones, ‘is palm oil demon or unfairly demonized?’, values (instrumental and relational) interact with rationalizations (instrumental) grounded on a priori preferences (relational). This muddied debate urges clearer distinctions between the crop itself and how it is produced to achieve sustainable oil palm systems. More socially oriented narratives<span><span> emerge, such as oil palm being suitable to family farming, not just large multinational company<span> plantations, and as diversified agroforestry rather than </span></span>monoculture<span><span> production systems. These narratives shift the debate, posing new but similar risks of misrepresentation. We dissect current issues in the oil palm debate, linking ‘values of nature (VoN)’ to key dimensions of morality. Classifying different perspectives of reality allows new knowledge and understanding to emerge, moving toward more effective negotiations for developing inclusive oil palm value chains that further economic development, small-scale producers’ livelihoods, and </span>environmental health.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":294,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"64 ","pages":"Article 101321"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343523000684","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In the public debate on the expansion of oil palm production in tropical forest zones, ‘is palm oil demon or unfairly demonized?’, values (instrumental and relational) interact with rationalizations (instrumental) grounded on a priori preferences (relational). This muddied debate urges clearer distinctions between the crop itself and how it is produced to achieve sustainable oil palm systems. More socially oriented narratives emerge, such as oil palm being suitable to family farming, not just large multinational company plantations, and as diversified agroforestry rather than monoculture production systems. These narratives shift the debate, posing new but similar risks of misrepresentation. We dissect current issues in the oil palm debate, linking ‘values of nature (VoN)’ to key dimensions of morality. Classifying different perspectives of reality allows new knowledge and understanding to emerge, moving toward more effective negotiations for developing inclusive oil palm value chains that further economic development, small-scale producers’ livelihoods, and environmental health.

Abstract Image

油棕生产、工具和关系价值观:价值链上的心、头和手的公关之战
在公众关于在热带森林地区扩大油棕生产的辩论中,“棕榈油是恶魔还是被不公地妖魔化了?”’,价值观(工具性和关系性)与基于先验偏好(关系性)的合理化(工具性)相互作用。这场混乱的辩论促使人们对这种作物本身及其生产方式进行更明确的区分,以实现可持续的油棕系统。更多面向社会的叙述出现了,例如油棕适合家庭农业,而不仅仅是大型跨国公司种植园,以及多样化的农林复合生产系统,而不是单一的生产系统。这些叙述改变了辩论的方向,带来了新的但类似的误传风险。我们剖析了油棕辩论中的当前问题,将“自然价值”与道德的关键维度联系起来。对现实的不同观点进行分类,可以产生新的知识和理解,从而推动更有效的谈判,以发展包容性的油棕价值链,促进经济发展、小规模生产者的生计和环境健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: "Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability (COSUST)" is a distinguished journal within Elsevier's esteemed scientific publishing portfolio, known for its dedication to high-quality, reproducible research. Launched in 2010, COSUST is a part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite, which is recognized for its editorial excellence and global impact. The journal specializes in peer-reviewed, concise, and timely short reviews that provide a synthesis of recent literature, emerging topics, innovations, and perspectives in the field of environmental sustainability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信