Meeting Ourselves or Other Sides of Us? - Meta-Analysis of the Metaverse

IF 3.4 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
M. Cruz, Abílio Oliveira, Alessandro Pinheiro
{"title":"Meeting Ourselves or Other Sides of Us? - Meta-Analysis of the Metaverse","authors":"M. Cruz, Abílio Oliveira, Alessandro Pinheiro","doi":"10.3390/informatics10020047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We were promised that the Metaverse would revolutionize our lives, social interactions, work, and business. However, how and when will this happen? We have seen the growth and development of technology, but there is no agreement or prediction about a specific time, and we can only follow the how question. To investigate more leads about this concept, we considered a main research question: How is the Metaverse actually being perceived? This question is connected with three objectives: to verify how the Metaverse is being represented and characterized, identify the main dimensions that facilitate or influence the acceptance of the Metaverse, and identify the leading technologies that suit the Metaverse concept. This study consisted of a documental analysis—or meta-analysis—of fifty of the most relevant scientific papers (taking into account some inclusion criteria) published in the last three years, using the Leximancer software to create concept maps to illustrate the main concepts and themes extracted from the articles to understand their associations or relations with the Metaverse concept. This study provided us with essential findings about how this concept has been perceived and allowed us to answer our objectives, contributing to a scientific discussion on the topic, and provided some valid suggestions for future research, which is already in progress. It also provided new leads on approaching this concept in development.","PeriodicalId":37100,"journal":{"name":"Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics10020047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We were promised that the Metaverse would revolutionize our lives, social interactions, work, and business. However, how and when will this happen? We have seen the growth and development of technology, but there is no agreement or prediction about a specific time, and we can only follow the how question. To investigate more leads about this concept, we considered a main research question: How is the Metaverse actually being perceived? This question is connected with three objectives: to verify how the Metaverse is being represented and characterized, identify the main dimensions that facilitate or influence the acceptance of the Metaverse, and identify the leading technologies that suit the Metaverse concept. This study consisted of a documental analysis—or meta-analysis—of fifty of the most relevant scientific papers (taking into account some inclusion criteria) published in the last three years, using the Leximancer software to create concept maps to illustrate the main concepts and themes extracted from the articles to understand their associations or relations with the Metaverse concept. This study provided us with essential findings about how this concept has been perceived and allowed us to answer our objectives, contributing to a scientific discussion on the topic, and provided some valid suggestions for future research, which is already in progress. It also provided new leads on approaching this concept in development.
遇见我们自己还是另一面?-元宇宙的元分析
我们被承诺,虚拟世界将彻底改变我们的生活、社会互动、工作和商业。然而,这将如何以及何时发生?我们已经看到了技术的成长和发展,但是对于一个具体的时间没有共识或预测,我们只能遵循如何的问题。为了调查更多关于这个概念的线索,我们考虑了一个主要的研究问题:虚拟世界实际上是如何被感知的?这个问题与三个目标有关:验证如何表示和表征虚拟现实,确定促进或影响虚拟现实接受度的主要维度,以及确定适合虚拟现实概念的领先技术。这项研究包括对过去三年发表的50篇最相关的科学论文(考虑到一些纳入标准)进行文献分析或荟萃分析,使用Leximancer软件创建概念图来说明从文章中提取的主要概念和主题,以了解它们与元宇宙概念的关联或关系。这项研究为我们提供了关于这个概念是如何被感知的基本发现,并允许我们回答我们的目标,有助于对这个主题的科学讨论,并为已经在进行中的未来研究提供了一些有效的建议。它还为在发展中接近这一概念提供了新的线索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Informatics
Informatics Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
88
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信