The Effectiveness of The Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) and Preview Question Read Reflect Recite Review (PQ4R) on Reading Comphrehension Skill

Asih Wahyuningsih, M. Citraningrum
{"title":"The Effectiveness of The Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) and Preview Question Read Reflect Recite Review (PQ4R) on Reading Comphrehension Skill","authors":"Asih Wahyuningsih, M. Citraningrum","doi":"10.23917/IJOLAE.V1I1.7383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to describe the effectiveness of the CIRC and PQ4R models on the reading comprehension skills of the fifth semester students of the PGSD study program. This study uses quasi-experimental design with pretest-posttest nonequivalent group design. This study used two experimental groups and one control group. The population of this study was the fifth semester students of PGSD Study Program. Sampling is done using a simple random sampling technique. To determine the effectiveness of learning CIRC and PQ4R, the data were analyzed using t-test and anava. The results of this study indicate that CIRC learning is effective in learning reading skills understanding of the fifth semester of PGSD Study Program with a significant level of 0.006 0.05. PQ4R learning is effective in learning reading comprehension skills in students in the fifth grade of elementary school with a significant level showing 0,000 0,05. The difference in CIRC and PQ4R learning is effective in reading skills. The fifth semester students of PGSD study program with a significance level of 0,000 0,05.","PeriodicalId":34584,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education IJOLAE","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education IJOLAE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23917/IJOLAE.V1I1.7383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This research aims to describe the effectiveness of the CIRC and PQ4R models on the reading comprehension skills of the fifth semester students of the PGSD study program. This study uses quasi-experimental design with pretest-posttest nonequivalent group design. This study used two experimental groups and one control group. The population of this study was the fifth semester students of PGSD Study Program. Sampling is done using a simple random sampling technique. To determine the effectiveness of learning CIRC and PQ4R, the data were analyzed using t-test and anava. The results of this study indicate that CIRC learning is effective in learning reading skills understanding of the fifth semester of PGSD Study Program with a significant level of 0.006 0.05. PQ4R learning is effective in learning reading comprehension skills in students in the fifth grade of elementary school with a significant level showing 0,000 0,05. The difference in CIRC and PQ4R learning is effective in reading skills. The fifth semester students of PGSD study program with a significance level of 0,000 0,05.
合作综合阅读与作文(CIRC)和预习题阅读反思背诵复习(PQ4R)对阅读理解能力的影响
本研究旨在描述CIRC和PQ4R模型对研究生学习计划第五学期学生阅读理解技能的有效性。本研究采用准实验设计和前测后测非等效组设计。本研究采用两个实验组和一个对照组。本研究的研究对象为PGSD学习计划的第五学期学生。抽样是使用简单的随机抽样技术完成的。为了确定CIRC和PQ4R学习的有效性,采用t检验和anava对数据进行分析。本研究结果表明,CIRC学习对PGSD学习计划第五学期的阅读技能理解学习有效,显著水平为0.006 0.05。PQ4R学习在小学五年级学生的阅读理解技能学习中是有效的,显著水平为0,0,05。CIRC和PQ4R学习的差异对阅读技能是有效的。PGSD第五学期学生学习计划的显著性水平为0000,05。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信