Land will tear us apart: family-farm division and real estate market in Slovenia (sixteenth to eighteenth centuries)

IF 1 3区 历史学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES
Aleksander Panjek
{"title":"Land will tear us apart: family-farm division and real estate market in Slovenia (sixteenth to eighteenth centuries)","authors":"Aleksander Panjek","doi":"10.1080/1081602X.2021.2005654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The article addresses the question of family and farm in the eastern Alpine area in the pre-statistical period in the case of Slovenia. In particular, it questions the prevalence of the ‘Bauer-type’ family, in which the farm is indivisible, the male farm head has a pronounced autocratic power, while his siblings and other family members are relegated to a subordinate role. Since family and kinship history research in early modern rural Slovenia doesn’t offer sufficiently solid foundations, the division of farms is investigated as a signal of the absence of the ‘Bauer’ model and instead of the presence of a partible succession system. The figures on farm division in different areas in the long run are integrated by information on inheritance and dowry practices, taken from the literature and archival sources. Furthermore, by identifying the actors on the peasant land market, who were entitled to sell and purchase farms and plots, family and gender-related aspects of land-ownership rights are disclosed. The research combines scholarly literature with archive sources to present regional overviews and case studies, on which it reconstructs a wholly original and comprehensive insight into family, farm and land market in Slovenia. The resulting picture is more complex than the simple extension of the ‘Bauer’ family-type would suggest, somehow resembling the composite situation of Tyrol, and it reverses the existing interpretation in Slovenian literature. In fact, farm divisibility seems to prevail, although indivisibility was present. Partible succession was the rule, both in the case of divisible and indivisible farms. The prevailing customary law among peasants was partible inheritance, preferably to males, combined with a dowry system and the separation of property between spouses.","PeriodicalId":46118,"journal":{"name":"History of the Family","volume":"27 1","pages":"54 - 81"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of the Family","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1081602X.2021.2005654","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The article addresses the question of family and farm in the eastern Alpine area in the pre-statistical period in the case of Slovenia. In particular, it questions the prevalence of the ‘Bauer-type’ family, in which the farm is indivisible, the male farm head has a pronounced autocratic power, while his siblings and other family members are relegated to a subordinate role. Since family and kinship history research in early modern rural Slovenia doesn’t offer sufficiently solid foundations, the division of farms is investigated as a signal of the absence of the ‘Bauer’ model and instead of the presence of a partible succession system. The figures on farm division in different areas in the long run are integrated by information on inheritance and dowry practices, taken from the literature and archival sources. Furthermore, by identifying the actors on the peasant land market, who were entitled to sell and purchase farms and plots, family and gender-related aspects of land-ownership rights are disclosed. The research combines scholarly literature with archive sources to present regional overviews and case studies, on which it reconstructs a wholly original and comprehensive insight into family, farm and land market in Slovenia. The resulting picture is more complex than the simple extension of the ‘Bauer’ family-type would suggest, somehow resembling the composite situation of Tyrol, and it reverses the existing interpretation in Slovenian literature. In fact, farm divisibility seems to prevail, although indivisibility was present. Partible succession was the rule, both in the case of divisible and indivisible farms. The prevailing customary law among peasants was partible inheritance, preferably to males, combined with a dowry system and the separation of property between spouses.
土地将撕裂我们:斯洛文尼亚的家庭农场分割和房地产市场(十六至十八世纪)
本文以斯洛文尼亚为例,探讨了统计前时期阿尔卑斯山东部地区的家庭和农场问题。特别是,它质疑“鲍尔型”家庭的普遍性,在这种家庭中,农场是不可分割的,男性农场负责人拥有明显的专制权力,而他的兄弟姐妹和其他家庭成员则被降级为从属角色。由于斯洛文尼亚早期现代农村的家庭和亲属关系史研究没有提供足够坚实的基础,因此对农场的划分进行调查是缺乏“鲍尔”模式的信号,而不是存在可分割的继承制度。从长远来看,不同地区的农场划分数据与文献和档案来源的遗产和嫁妆做法信息相结合。此外,通过确定农民土地市场上有权出售和购买农场和地块的行为者,披露了土地所有权的家庭和性别相关方面。该研究将学术文献与档案来源相结合,提供了区域综述和案例研究,在此基础上,它重建了对斯洛文尼亚家庭、农场和土地市场的完全原创和全面的见解。由此产生的画面比“鲍尔”家族类型的简单延伸所暗示的更复杂,在某种程度上类似于蒂罗尔的复合情况,它推翻了斯洛文尼亚文学中现有的解释。事实上,尽管存在不可分割性,但农场的可分割性似乎占了上风。在可分割和不可分割的农场中,可分割的继承都是规则。在农民中盛行的习惯法是可分割继承,最好是男性继承,并结合嫁妆制度和配偶之间的财产分割。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The History of the Family: An International Quarterly makes a significant contribution by publishing works reflecting new developments in scholarship and by charting new directions in the historical study of the family. Further emphasizing the international developments in historical research on the family, the Quarterly encourages articles on comparative research across various cultures and societies in Asia, Africa, Latin America, and the Pacific Rim, in addition to Europe, the United States and Canada, as well as work in the context of global history.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信