Intervention studies to reduce the impact of climate change on health in rural communities in the United States: a systematic review

Daniel J. Smith, Elizabeth Mizelle, Sharon L. Leslie, Grace X Li, Sheila Stone, P. Stauffer, Anna R. Smith, Gianna Lewis, E. L. Rodden, R. McDermott-Levy, Lisa M. Thompson
{"title":"Intervention studies to reduce the impact of climate change on health in rural communities in the United States: a systematic review","authors":"Daniel J. Smith, Elizabeth Mizelle, Sharon L. Leslie, Grace X Li, Sheila Stone, P. Stauffer, Anna R. Smith, Gianna Lewis, E. L. Rodden, R. McDermott-Levy, Lisa M. Thompson","doi":"10.1088/2752-5309/acbbe6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Climate change, the greatest public health threat of the 21st century, will uniquely affect rural areas that are geographically isolated and experience greater health inequities. This systematic review describes and evaluates interventions to lessen the effects of climate change on human health in the rural United States, including interventions on air pollution, vector ecology, water quality, severe weather, extreme heat, allergens, and water and food supply. Searches were constructed based on the eight domains of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Framework “Impact of Climate Change on Human Health.” Searches were conducted in EBSCO Environment Complete, EBSCO GreenFILE, Embase.com, MEDLINE via PubMed, and Web of Science. Duplicate citations were removed, abstracts were screened for initial inclusion, and full texts were screened for final inclusion. Pertinent data were extracted and synthesized across the eight domains. Article quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Of 8471 studies screened, 297 were identified for full text review, and a total 49 studies were included in this review. Across the domains, 34 unique interventions addressed health outcomes due to air pollution (n = 8), changes in vector ecology (n = 6), water quality (n = 5), severe weather (n = 3), extreme heat (n = 2) increasing allergens (n = 1), water and food supply (n = 1), and across multiple CDC domains (n = 8). Participatory action research methodology was commonly used and strived to mobilize/empower communities to tackle climate change. Our review identified three randomized controlled trials, with two of these three published in the last five years. While original research on the impact of climate change on health has increased in the past decade, randomized control trials may not be ethical, cost effective, or feasible. There is a need for time-efficient and high-quality scholarship that investigates intervention efficacy and effectiveness for reducing health impacts of climate change upon rural populations.","PeriodicalId":72938,"journal":{"name":"Environmental research, health : ERH","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental research, health : ERH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5309/acbbe6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Climate change, the greatest public health threat of the 21st century, will uniquely affect rural areas that are geographically isolated and experience greater health inequities. This systematic review describes and evaluates interventions to lessen the effects of climate change on human health in the rural United States, including interventions on air pollution, vector ecology, water quality, severe weather, extreme heat, allergens, and water and food supply. Searches were constructed based on the eight domains of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Framework “Impact of Climate Change on Human Health.” Searches were conducted in EBSCO Environment Complete, EBSCO GreenFILE, Embase.com, MEDLINE via PubMed, and Web of Science. Duplicate citations were removed, abstracts were screened for initial inclusion, and full texts were screened for final inclusion. Pertinent data were extracted and synthesized across the eight domains. Article quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Of 8471 studies screened, 297 were identified for full text review, and a total 49 studies were included in this review. Across the domains, 34 unique interventions addressed health outcomes due to air pollution (n = 8), changes in vector ecology (n = 6), water quality (n = 5), severe weather (n = 3), extreme heat (n = 2) increasing allergens (n = 1), water and food supply (n = 1), and across multiple CDC domains (n = 8). Participatory action research methodology was commonly used and strived to mobilize/empower communities to tackle climate change. Our review identified three randomized controlled trials, with two of these three published in the last five years. While original research on the impact of climate change on health has increased in the past decade, randomized control trials may not be ethical, cost effective, or feasible. There is a need for time-efficient and high-quality scholarship that investigates intervention efficacy and effectiveness for reducing health impacts of climate change upon rural populations.
减少气候变化对美国农村社区健康影响的干预研究:系统回顾
气候变化是21世纪最大的公共卫生威胁,它对地理上孤立、卫生不平等现象更严重的农村地区将产生独特影响。本系统综述描述和评估了减少气候变化对美国农村人类健康影响的干预措施,包括对空气污染、媒介生态学、水质、恶劣天气、极端高温、过敏原以及水和食物供应的干预措施。搜索是基于疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)框架“气候变化对人类健康的影响”的八个领域构建的。在EBSCO Environment Complete, EBSCO GreenFILE, Embase.com, MEDLINE via PubMed和Web of Science中进行了搜索。删除重复引用,筛选摘要作为初始纳入,筛选全文作为最终纳入。提取并综合了八个领域的相关数据。采用混合方法评价工具评价文章质量。在筛选的8471项研究中,有297项被确定为全文综述,共有49项研究被纳入本综述。在这些领域中,34种独特的干预措施涉及空气污染(n = 8)、媒介生态变化(n = 6)、水质(n = 5)、恶劣天气(n = 3)、极端高温(n = 2)、过敏原增加(n = 1)、水和食物供应(n = 1)以及多个疾病预防控制中心领域(n = 8)造成的健康结果。参与式行动研究方法被普遍使用,并努力动员/赋予社区应对气候变化的能力。我们的综述确定了三个随机对照试验,其中两个是在最近五年内发表的。虽然在过去十年中,关于气候变化对健康影响的原始研究有所增加,但随机对照试验可能不符合伦理、成本效益或可行性。需要有省时和高质量的学术研究,以调查减少气候变化对农村人口健康影响的干预效果和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信