Identifying Critical Dispute Causes in the Construction Industry: A Cross-Regional Comparative Study between China and the UK

IF 5.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Jinpeng Wang, S. Zhang, Ruoyu Jin, P. Fenn, Dongwen Yu, Lilin Zhao
{"title":"Identifying Critical Dispute Causes in the Construction Industry: A Cross-Regional Comparative Study between China and the UK","authors":"Jinpeng Wang, S. Zhang, Ruoyu Jin, P. Fenn, Dongwen Yu, Lilin Zhao","doi":"10.1061/jmenea.meeng-4943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Construction disputes have long been identified as epidemics in the construction industry worldwide, which has become a more serious problem due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Previous studies on the dispute causes have primarily focused on country- or region-specific contexts and hence the results cannot be generalized in solving this chronic problem in a broader construction project worldwide. This study aims to explore and evaluate the critical dispute causes in construction projects through a comparative study between China and the United Kingdom. A total of 33 common dispute causes were identified through a comprehensive literature review and further consolidated by pilot surveys in the two countries. An online questionnaire survey was administered among construction professionals in China and the United Kingdom, with 170 valid responses returned for data analysis. Principal component factor analysis, mean score ranking approach, quartile analysis, and Mann-Whitney U testing were employed to identify the most critical dispute causes. Similarities and differences were mapped between the two countries. It was found that the five most critical categories of dispute causes in the two territories are: delay-related problems, lack of communication, contractual problems, site conditions, and design problems. The importance of variation in quantities, breach of contract, misinterpretation of contractual terms and conditions, and poor contract management was perceived significantly differently by the respondents in China and the United Kingdom, whereas design defects and failure to make compensation for additional work were the most critical common dispute causes in both countries. The research provides important findings for both academics and practitioners to holistically understand the similarities and differences of dispute causes in China and the United Kingdom and aids in preventing disputes more effectively in the global construction industry. © 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.","PeriodicalId":50155,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management in Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1061/jmenea.meeng-4943","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Construction disputes have long been identified as epidemics in the construction industry worldwide, which has become a more serious problem due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Previous studies on the dispute causes have primarily focused on country- or region-specific contexts and hence the results cannot be generalized in solving this chronic problem in a broader construction project worldwide. This study aims to explore and evaluate the critical dispute causes in construction projects through a comparative study between China and the United Kingdom. A total of 33 common dispute causes were identified through a comprehensive literature review and further consolidated by pilot surveys in the two countries. An online questionnaire survey was administered among construction professionals in China and the United Kingdom, with 170 valid responses returned for data analysis. Principal component factor analysis, mean score ranking approach, quartile analysis, and Mann-Whitney U testing were employed to identify the most critical dispute causes. Similarities and differences were mapped between the two countries. It was found that the five most critical categories of dispute causes in the two territories are: delay-related problems, lack of communication, contractual problems, site conditions, and design problems. The importance of variation in quantities, breach of contract, misinterpretation of contractual terms and conditions, and poor contract management was perceived significantly differently by the respondents in China and the United Kingdom, whereas design defects and failure to make compensation for additional work were the most critical common dispute causes in both countries. The research provides important findings for both academics and practitioners to holistically understand the similarities and differences of dispute causes in China and the United Kingdom and aids in preventing disputes more effectively in the global construction industry. © 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
建筑业关键纠纷成因识别:中英跨区域比较研究
建筑纠纷长期以来一直被认定为全球建筑业的流行病,由于新冠肺炎疫情的影响,这已成为一个更严重的问题。先前关于争端起因的研究主要集中在国家或地区的具体背景下,因此,在全球范围内更广泛的建筑项目中,解决这一长期问题的结果不能一概而论。本研究旨在通过对中国和英国的比较研究,探索和评估建设项目中关键争议的原因。通过全面的文献综述,共确定了33个常见的纠纷原因,并通过在两国进行的试点调查进行了进一步整合。在中国和英国的建筑专业人员中进行了一项在线问卷调查,共返回170份有效回复进行数据分析。采用主成分因素分析、平均得分排名法、四分位数分析和Mann-Whitney U检验来确定最关键的争议原因。这两个国家之间的相似之处和不同之处被描绘出来了。调查发现,这两个地区最关键的五类争端原因是:与延误有关的问题、缺乏沟通、合同问题、场地条件和设计问题。中国和英国的受访者对数量变化、违约、对合同条款和条件的误解以及合同管理不善的重要性有着明显的不同看法,而设计缺陷和未能对额外工作进行补偿是两国最常见的主要争议原因。这项研究为学术界和从业者全面了解中国和英国纠纷原因的异同提供了重要发现,有助于更有效地预防全球建筑业的纠纷。©2022美国土木工程师学会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Management in Engineering
Journal of Management in Engineering 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
23.00%
发文量
124
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Management in Engineering offers an avenue for researchers and practitioners to present contemporary issues associated with management and leadership for the civil engineer. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers, case studies, technical notes, and discussions of interest to the practice of civil engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信