Factors Influencing Use–diversity of Urban Parks: A Cross-cultural Study Between Chengdu (China) and Perth (Australia)

IF 1.3 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
M. Swapan, Md. Sayed Iftekhar, Xiyuan Li
{"title":"Factors Influencing Use–diversity of Urban Parks: A Cross-cultural Study Between Chengdu (China) and Perth (Australia)","authors":"M. Swapan, Md. Sayed Iftekhar, Xiyuan Li","doi":"10.1177/09754253221120616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urban parks are an essential component of city infrastructure providing multiple ecosystem services. While there are many studies exploring the usage of urban parks within a country, cross-country comparisons are rare. Comparative studies of use–diversity of urban parks between developing and developed countries are almost absent. To address this research gap, we have compared use–diversity of two major urban parks in China (Dufu Cottage in Chengdu—DC) and in Australia (Kings Park in Perth—KP). Using a post-occupancy survey questionnaire, we addressed two key questions: (a) is there any difference in use–diversity between these urban parks? And (b) which demographic and socio-economic factors influence use pattern of urban parks the most? We observed that, in general, use frequency is lower in DC when compared to KP. In both parks, the opportunity of physical activity is the most important motive for visitation. Most of the usage is concentrated during the weekends in DC; KP was used more consistently throughout the week. Various socio-demographic factors, such as gender, age, income level and frequency of visits, have some influence on frequency and diversity of usage. The impact of socio-demographic factors on the extent of use highlights the importance of understanding users’ profiles to adopt more targeted measures to address local demands. The study identified some common patterns and differences in use–diversity between the two parks, underscoring the potential for managers of these parks in both countries, for mutual learning and adopting best management practices.","PeriodicalId":44690,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Urbanization ASIA","volume":"13 1","pages":"203 - 217"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Urbanization ASIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09754253221120616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban parks are an essential component of city infrastructure providing multiple ecosystem services. While there are many studies exploring the usage of urban parks within a country, cross-country comparisons are rare. Comparative studies of use–diversity of urban parks between developing and developed countries are almost absent. To address this research gap, we have compared use–diversity of two major urban parks in China (Dufu Cottage in Chengdu—DC) and in Australia (Kings Park in Perth—KP). Using a post-occupancy survey questionnaire, we addressed two key questions: (a) is there any difference in use–diversity between these urban parks? And (b) which demographic and socio-economic factors influence use pattern of urban parks the most? We observed that, in general, use frequency is lower in DC when compared to KP. In both parks, the opportunity of physical activity is the most important motive for visitation. Most of the usage is concentrated during the weekends in DC; KP was used more consistently throughout the week. Various socio-demographic factors, such as gender, age, income level and frequency of visits, have some influence on frequency and diversity of usage. The impact of socio-demographic factors on the extent of use highlights the importance of understanding users’ profiles to adopt more targeted measures to address local demands. The study identified some common patterns and differences in use–diversity between the two parks, underscoring the potential for managers of these parks in both countries, for mutual learning and adopting best management practices.
城市公园利用多样性的影响因素——中国成都与澳大利亚珀斯的跨文化研究
城市公园是城市基础设施的重要组成部分,提供多种生态系统服务。虽然有许多研究探讨了一个国家内城市公园的使用情况,但跨国比较很少。对发展中国家和发达国家城市公园利用多样性的比较研究几乎没有。为了解决这一研究空白,我们比较了中国(成都- dc的杜甫小屋)和澳大利亚(珀斯- kp的国王公园)两个主要城市公园的使用多样性。通过使用后调查问卷,我们回答了两个关键问题:(a)这些城市公园之间的使用多样性是否存在差异?(b)哪些人口和社会经济因素对城市公园的使用模式影响最大?我们观察到,一般来说,与KP相比,DC的使用频率更低。在这两个公园里,体育活动的机会是游客最重要的动机。大部分的使用集中在华盛顿特区的周末;在整个星期中,KP的使用更加一致。各种社会人口因素,如性别、年龄、收入水平和访问频率,对使用频率和多样性有一定影响。社会人口因素对使用程度的影响突出了了解用户概况的重要性,以便采取更有针对性的措施来满足当地需求。这项研究确定了两个公园在使用多样性方面的一些共同模式和差异,强调了两国这些公园的管理人员相互学习和采用最佳管理做法的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environment and Urbanization ASIA
Environment and Urbanization ASIA ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信