Comparative Analysis of Topical Versus Intravenous Administration of Epsilon-Aminocaproic Acid on Blood Management in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Benjamin Lancaster, Alexander Wendling, Tanner Poppe, Rosalee Zackula, Wade Massey, R. Cusick, Paul C Pappademos
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Topical Versus Intravenous Administration of Epsilon-Aminocaproic Acid on Blood Management in Total Knee Arthroplasty","authors":"Benjamin Lancaster, Alexander Wendling, Tanner Poppe, Rosalee Zackula, Wade Massey, R. Cusick, Paul C Pappademos","doi":"10.17161/kjm.vol15.16036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Although the use of antifibrinolytics to reduce perioperative blood loss during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has shown unequivocal benefit in regard to blood conservation, the best route of administration remains in question. This study tested the hypothesis that topical delivery of epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) was superior to intravenous (IV) administration in the setting of primary TKA. Methods This cross-sectional study included a six-year retrospective chart review of TKA patients done by a single surgeon. Post-operative hemoglobin levels and the incidence of blood transfusions were compared among three patient subgroups: no EACA, topical EACA, or IV EACA. Key outcome measures included post-operative hemoglobin, need for post-operative transfusion, and length of hospital stay. Results Of the 668 patients included in this study, 351 (52.5%) received IV EACA, 298 (44.6%) received topical EACA, and 19 (2.8%) received no EACA. For the three-way comparisons, significant differences were observed for post-operative mean hemoglobin on day one (p < 0.001), day two (p < 0.001), and day three (p = 0.004), with consistently higher means for participants in the topical group. Eight patients required transfusions in the IV EACA group, but none were needed in the topical EACA group (p = 0.027). Length of stay was shortest for patients in the topical group, with 66% hospitalized for two days, while 84% of the IV group remained hospitalized for three days (p < 0.001). Conclusions The topical delivery of EACA is superior to IV administration with respect to blood conservation for patients undergoing primary TKA.","PeriodicalId":94121,"journal":{"name":"Kansas journal of medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":"73 - 77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kansas journal of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol15.16036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Although the use of antifibrinolytics to reduce perioperative blood loss during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has shown unequivocal benefit in regard to blood conservation, the best route of administration remains in question. This study tested the hypothesis that topical delivery of epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) was superior to intravenous (IV) administration in the setting of primary TKA. Methods This cross-sectional study included a six-year retrospective chart review of TKA patients done by a single surgeon. Post-operative hemoglobin levels and the incidence of blood transfusions were compared among three patient subgroups: no EACA, topical EACA, or IV EACA. Key outcome measures included post-operative hemoglobin, need for post-operative transfusion, and length of hospital stay. Results Of the 668 patients included in this study, 351 (52.5%) received IV EACA, 298 (44.6%) received topical EACA, and 19 (2.8%) received no EACA. For the three-way comparisons, significant differences were observed for post-operative mean hemoglobin on day one (p < 0.001), day two (p < 0.001), and day three (p = 0.004), with consistently higher means for participants in the topical group. Eight patients required transfusions in the IV EACA group, but none were needed in the topical EACA group (p = 0.027). Length of stay was shortest for patients in the topical group, with 66% hospitalized for two days, while 84% of the IV group remained hospitalized for three days (p < 0.001). Conclusions The topical delivery of EACA is superior to IV administration with respect to blood conservation for patients undergoing primary TKA.
全膝关节置换术中局部与静脉应用ε-氨基己酸对血液管理的比较分析
引言尽管在全膝关节置换术(TKA)期间使用抗纤溶药减少围手术期失血已显示出在血液保护方面的明确益处,但最佳给药途径仍存在疑问。本研究验证了在原发性TKA的情况下,局部递送ε-氨基己酸(EACA)优于静脉注射(IV)的假设。方法这项横断面研究包括由一名外科医生对TKA患者进行的为期六年的回顾性图表审查。比较三个亚组患者术后血红蛋白水平和输血发生率:无EACA、局部EACA或静脉EACA。关键的结果指标包括术后血红蛋白、术后输血需求和住院时间。结果本研究纳入的668例患者中,351例(52.5%)接受了静脉注射EACA,298例(44.6%)接受了局部EACA,19例(2.8%)未接受EACA。在三方比较中,术后第一天(p<0.001)、第二天(p>0.001)和第三天(p=0.004)的平均血红蛋白存在显著差异,局部用药组的平均值始终较高。静脉注射EACA组有8名患者需要输血,但外用EACA组无需输血(p=0.027)。外用组患者的住院时间最短,66%的患者住院两天,而静脉注射组84%的患者住院3天(p<0.001)。结论对于原发性TKA患者,局部给药EACA在血液保护方面优于静脉给药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信