Revising the institutionalization of science policies: Historical contexts and competing models

IF 0.2 Q3 Social Sciences
Marie Rollo, T. Brandão, Maria Inês Queiroz
{"title":"Revising the institutionalization of science policies: Historical contexts and competing models","authors":"Marie Rollo, T. Brandão, Maria Inês Queiroz","doi":"10.1386/PJSS.17.1.37_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is relatively frequent within the social sciences, particularly the history of science, to recognize, with more or less focus, the role of institutionalization and professionalization processes in the development of science and technology. Differences between various scientific institutions are not yet sufficiently understood, including their profiles and the different historical contexts in which they have been created, reformed and/or recreated, which makes up different models and historical implications as regards the assumptions of national science policies. By studying comparative work in the history of the Portuguese science policy process the main purpose of this article is to understand, compare and differentiate the relevant national experiences related to different national science policies agencies, mainly across Europe and North America, during the twentieth century, but with particular focus on the inter-war period and afterwards.","PeriodicalId":51963,"journal":{"name":"Portuguese Journal of Social Science","volume":"17 1","pages":"37-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Portuguese Journal of Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/PJSS.17.1.37_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

It is relatively frequent within the social sciences, particularly the history of science, to recognize, with more or less focus, the role of institutionalization and professionalization processes in the development of science and technology. Differences between various scientific institutions are not yet sufficiently understood, including their profiles and the different historical contexts in which they have been created, reformed and/or recreated, which makes up different models and historical implications as regards the assumptions of national science policies. By studying comparative work in the history of the Portuguese science policy process the main purpose of this article is to understand, compare and differentiate the relevant national experiences related to different national science policies agencies, mainly across Europe and North America, during the twentieth century, but with particular focus on the inter-war period and afterwards.
重新审视科学政策的制度化:历史背景和竞争模式
在社会科学,特别是科学史中,认识到制度化和专业化进程在科学和技术发展中的作用,或多或少是比较常见的。不同科学机构之间的差异还没有得到充分的理解,包括它们的概况和它们被创建、改革和/或重建的不同历史背景,这构成了关于国家科学政策假设的不同模型和历史含义。通过研究葡萄牙科学政策过程历史上的比较工作,本文的主要目的是理解、比较和区分与20世纪不同国家科学政策机构相关的相关国家经验,主要是在欧洲和北美,但特别关注两次世界大战期间和之后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Portuguese Journal of Social Science is a peer-reviewed cross-disciplinary journal focusing on research about Portuguese society by scholars of any nationality. However, the journal takes a broad view and accepts articles that are not exclusively devoted to the Portuguese case. We particularly welcome comparative studies. While the journal concentrates on research articles it operates a flexible policy in respect of other types of submission, including book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信