[Midwives].

I. Hilgers
{"title":"[Midwives].","authors":"I. Hilgers","doi":"10.1093/nq/s2-xi.264.59e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Nurses Association of the College, and the American College of Nurse Midwives believe that improved maternity care and health services for women in the U.S. can be achieved by the cooperative efforts of teams of physicians, nurse-midwives, and obstetric registered nurses. Yet the Massachusetts Medical Society opposed House Bills 848 and 2200 authorizing the practice of midwifery in licensed facilities by a certifed nurse-midwife who functions as a member of a team that includes an obstetrician-gynecologist. The opposition was on the grounds that the use of midwives will dilute quality medical care. Does this mean the Society cannot recognize the deficits in availability and quality of maternity care in the U.S. and does not believe the reports of lower infant and maternal mortality rates in European countries using midwifery than in the U.S.? Or does it reflect the tendency of the physician to consider pregnancy and labor as illness? The American Medical Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics have endorsed the use of pediatric nurse associates and physician assistants in health care. The Massachusetts Medical Society should endorse the use of midwives in health care with a physician being called in to provide diagnosis and therapy where a condition incompatible with health is detected.\n","PeriodicalId":77238,"journal":{"name":"Krankenpflege Journal","volume":"31 1-2 1","pages":"42-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/nq/s2-xi.264.59e","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Krankenpflege Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nq/s2-xi.264.59e","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Nurses Association of the College, and the American College of Nurse Midwives believe that improved maternity care and health services for women in the U.S. can be achieved by the cooperative efforts of teams of physicians, nurse-midwives, and obstetric registered nurses. Yet the Massachusetts Medical Society opposed House Bills 848 and 2200 authorizing the practice of midwifery in licensed facilities by a certifed nurse-midwife who functions as a member of a team that includes an obstetrician-gynecologist. The opposition was on the grounds that the use of midwives will dilute quality medical care. Does this mean the Society cannot recognize the deficits in availability and quality of maternity care in the U.S. and does not believe the reports of lower infant and maternal mortality rates in European countries using midwifery than in the U.S.? Or does it reflect the tendency of the physician to consider pregnancy and labor as illness? The American Medical Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics have endorsed the use of pediatric nurse associates and physician assistants in health care. The Massachusetts Medical Society should endorse the use of midwives in health care with a physician being called in to provide diagnosis and therapy where a condition incompatible with health is detected.
(助产士)。
美国妇产科学院、学院护士协会和美国助产士护士学院认为,通过医生、助产士和产科注册护士团队的合作,可以改善美国妇女的产妇护理和健康服务。然而,马萨诸塞州医学会反对众议院第848号和第2200号法案,该法案授权由一名经过认证的助产士在有执照的设施中执业,助产士是包括妇产科医生在内的团队的成员。反对的理由是使用助产士会降低医疗质量。这是否意味着该协会无法认识到美国在产妇护理的可用性和质量方面的不足,也不相信使用助产士的欧洲国家婴儿和产妇死亡率低于美国的报告。?还是反映了医生将怀孕和分娩视为疾病的倾向?美国医学会和美国儿科学会已经批准在医疗保健中使用儿科护士助理和医生助理。马萨诸塞州医学会应批准在医疗保健中使用助产士,并在发现与健康不相容的情况时,请医生提供诊断和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信