Can One Both Contribute to and Benefit from Herd Immunity?

Q2 Arts and Humanities

Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics Pub Date : 2021-09-02 DOI:10.23941/ejpe.v14i2.603

L. White

引用次数: 3

Abstract

In a recent article, “Vaccine Refusal Is Not Free Riding”, Ethan Bradley and Mark Navin (2021) argue that vaccine refusal is not akin to free riding. Here, I defend one connection between vaccine refusal and free riding and suggest that, when viewed in conjunction with their other arguments, this might constitute a reason to mandate Covid-19 vaccination.

查看原文本刊更多论文

一个人能既促进群体免疫又受益于群体免疫吗?

在最近的一篇文章《拒绝接种疫苗不是搭便车》中，Ethan Bradley和Mark Navin(2021)认为，拒绝接种疫苗不等同于搭便车。在这里，我为拒绝接种疫苗和搭便车之间的联系进行辩护，并建议，当与他们的其他论点结合起来考虑时，这可能构成强制接种Covid-19疫苗的理由。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics (EJPE) is a peer-reviewed bi-annual academic journal supported by the Erasmus Institute for Philosophy and Economics at the Erasmus School of Philosophy of Erasmus University Rotterdam. EJPE publishes research on the methodology, history, ethics, and interdisciplinary relations of economics, and welcomes contributions from all scholars with an interest in any of its research domains. EJPE is an Open Access Journal: all the content is permanently available online without subscription or payment. EJPE aims to... -Publish high quality original research on the intersection of philosophy and economics. -Support the inter-disciplinary development of the field with critical survey papers covering ongoing debates and information about relevant publications. -Provide a forum that is friendly to young scholars, and supported by an authoritative, efficient, and constructive review process.