{"title":"Temporarily for Your Majesty: Debates on Abolishing Courtesan Slavery in Chosŏn Korea","authors":"Hyunsun Park","doi":"10.1353/jas.2021.0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:I identify the institution of government courtesans in Chosŏn Korea as state slavery. Government courtesans, like other government slaves and like private household slaves, were legally defined as chattel property in Chosŏn. Yet courtesans differed from those other types of slaves because their performances—labor mandated by the state— were constantly questioned and delegitimized by the government of nearly every Chosŏn king. Based on an examination of fifteenth- and sixteenth-century court debates about abolishing the courtesan system, I argue that the government’s repeated failures to abolish the use of courtesans produced the Chosŏn courtesan system as an illegitimate, temporary, and dispensable state apparatus. Paradoxically, the repeated designation of ongoing courtesan participation in royal, diplomatic, and military events as temporary in fact perpetuated courtesan slavery, even as the nominal illegitimacy removed any legal, social, or moral justification for the system.초록:이 논문은 조선 정부에서 국가 노예제인 관기 제도를 폐지하기 위한 논쟁 을 거듭했으나 매번 실패하는 지속적 과정이 관기 제도를 부적절하고, 임시적이 며, 제거 가능한 조직으로 만드는 담론적 효과를 창출했으며, 이를 통해 역설적 으로 국가 노예제의 권력 위계 질서를 영속화했다는 점에 대해 살펴본다.","PeriodicalId":29948,"journal":{"name":"HARVARD JOURNAL OF ASIATIC STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HARVARD JOURNAL OF ASIATIC STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jas.2021.0017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
abstract:I identify the institution of government courtesans in Chosŏn Korea as state slavery. Government courtesans, like other government slaves and like private household slaves, were legally defined as chattel property in Chosŏn. Yet courtesans differed from those other types of slaves because their performances—labor mandated by the state— were constantly questioned and delegitimized by the government of nearly every Chosŏn king. Based on an examination of fifteenth- and sixteenth-century court debates about abolishing the courtesan system, I argue that the government’s repeated failures to abolish the use of courtesans produced the Chosŏn courtesan system as an illegitimate, temporary, and dispensable state apparatus. Paradoxically, the repeated designation of ongoing courtesan participation in royal, diplomatic, and military events as temporary in fact perpetuated courtesan slavery, even as the nominal illegitimacy removed any legal, social, or moral justification for the system.초록:이 논문은 조선 정부에서 국가 노예제인 관기 제도를 폐지하기 위한 논쟁 을 거듭했으나 매번 실패하는 지속적 과정이 관기 제도를 부적절하고, 임시적이 며, 제거 가능한 조직으로 만드는 담론적 효과를 창출했으며, 이를 통해 역설적 으로 국가 노예제의 권력 위계 질서를 영속화했다는 점에 대해 살펴본다.
abstract:I identify the institution of government courtesans in Chosŏn Korea as state slavery. Government courtesans, like other government slaves and like private household slaves, were legally defined as chattel property in Chosŏn. Yet courtesans differed from those other types of slaves because their performances—labor mandated by the state— were constantly questioned and delegitimized by the government of nearly every Chosŏn king. Based on an examination of fifteenth- and sixteenth-century court debates about abolishing the courtesan system, I argue that the government’s repeated failures to abolish the use of courtesans produced the Chosŏn courtesan system as an illegitimate, temporary, and dispensable state apparatus. Paradoxically, the repeated designation of ongoing courtesan participation in royal, diplomatic, and military events as temporary in fact perpetuated courtesan slavery, even as the nominal illegitimacy removed any legal, social,or moral justification for the system.摘录:这篇论文讲述了朝鲜政府为废除国家奴隶制官妓制度而反复争论,但每次都失败的持续过程,创造了使官妓制度成为不恰当、临时、可移除组织的话语效果。通过这一点,我们来回顾一下,从反面来看,国家奴隶制的权力等级秩序得到了延续。