Breakoffs in an hour-long, online survey

T. Emery, S. Cabaço, Luisa Fadel, P. Lugtig, V. Toepoel, Almut Schumann, Detlev Lück, M. Bujard
{"title":"Breakoffs in an hour-long, online survey","authors":"T. Emery, S. Cabaço, Luisa Fadel, P. Lugtig, V. Toepoel, Almut Schumann, Detlev Lück, M. Bujard","doi":"10.29115/sp-2023-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We analyze paradata from an online pilot of the Generations and Gender Programme (GGP) conducted in three countries (Croatia, Germany, and Portugal) to understand the extent, timing, and patterns in breakoffs during a long online survey. The GGP is notable as an online survey given that the median length of a face-to-face interview is 52 minutes, and the survey was initially designed for face-to-face. Paradata was collected for 3,378 web surveys. Breakoffs before the questionnaire was completed occurred in 17% of these surveys. The analysis uses Cox regression models to explore the timing of breakoffs and the influence of contextual factors. The results indicate that the breakoff hazard does not increase or decrease across the length of the questionnaire. The risk of breakoff does vary considerably across countries, between genders, and also by partnership status. Respondents are twice as likely to breakoff on a loop question, and respondents completing the survey on a smartphone are 2.6 times as likely to breakoff as those using a tablet or PC. Respondents receiving a conditional incentive were 65% less likely to breakoff than those who did not. The lessons from this work can help inform future strategies converting existing long, cross-national face-to-face studies into an online format.","PeriodicalId":74893,"journal":{"name":"Survey practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29115/sp-2023-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

We analyze paradata from an online pilot of the Generations and Gender Programme (GGP) conducted in three countries (Croatia, Germany, and Portugal) to understand the extent, timing, and patterns in breakoffs during a long online survey. The GGP is notable as an online survey given that the median length of a face-to-face interview is 52 minutes, and the survey was initially designed for face-to-face. Paradata was collected for 3,378 web surveys. Breakoffs before the questionnaire was completed occurred in 17% of these surveys. The analysis uses Cox regression models to explore the timing of breakoffs and the influence of contextual factors. The results indicate that the breakoff hazard does not increase or decrease across the length of the questionnaire. The risk of breakoff does vary considerably across countries, between genders, and also by partnership status. Respondents are twice as likely to breakoff on a loop question, and respondents completing the survey on a smartphone are 2.6 times as likely to breakoff as those using a tablet or PC. Respondents receiving a conditional incentive were 65% less likely to breakoff than those who did not. The lessons from this work can help inform future strategies converting existing long, cross-national face-to-face studies into an online format.
一小时在线调查中的中断
我们分析了在三个国家(克罗地亚、德国和葡萄牙)进行的世代与性别计划(GGP)在线试点的样本数据,以了解在长期在线调查中中断的程度、时间和模式。GGP是一项值得注意的在线调查,因为面对面采访的中位长度为52分钟,而且该调查最初是为面对面而设计的。为3378项网络调查收集了副数据。在这些调查中,17%的调查在完成问卷调查之前中断。该分析使用Cox回归模型来探索中断的时间和上下文因素的影响。结果表明,在问卷的整个长度内,断裂危险不会增加或减少。分手的风险在不同国家、不同性别以及不同的伴侣关系中确实存在很大差异。受访者在循环问题上中断的可能性是使用智能手机的受访者的两倍,在智能手机上完成调查的受访者中断的可能性也是使用平板电脑或PC的受访者的2.6倍。接受有条件激励的受访者中断问题的可能性比未接受有条件奖励的受访者低65%。这项工作的经验教训有助于为未来的战略提供信息,将现有的长期、跨国家的面对面研究转化为在线形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信