Variation is the Norm: A Landscape Analysis of Weighted Student Funding Implementation

IF 0.9 Q4 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
M. Roza, Katherine Hagan, L. Anderson
{"title":"Variation is the Norm: A Landscape Analysis of Weighted Student Funding Implementation","authors":"M. Roza, Katherine Hagan, L. Anderson","doi":"10.1111/pbaf.12276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"School districts increasingly rely on weighted student funding (WSF), yet there is little research on this allocation model. This study collects more than 70 measures on each of 19 districts using WSF in 2018 for a landscape analysis of formula features and implementation practices. While districts report common reasons for adopting WSF (equity, flexibility, and transparency), the study finds no standard WSF model. Homegrown formulas and non-formula features and exemptions reflecting local context are the norm, resulting in substantial differences. Nearly all districts continue to budget with average salaries (likely limiting equity) but grant principals flexibility on staffing, stipends, and contracts.","PeriodicalId":46065,"journal":{"name":"Public Budgeting and Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/pbaf.12276","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Budgeting and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.12276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

School districts increasingly rely on weighted student funding (WSF), yet there is little research on this allocation model. This study collects more than 70 measures on each of 19 districts using WSF in 2018 for a landscape analysis of formula features and implementation practices. While districts report common reasons for adopting WSF (equity, flexibility, and transparency), the study finds no standard WSF model. Homegrown formulas and non-formula features and exemptions reflecting local context are the norm, resulting in substantial differences. Nearly all districts continue to budget with average salaries (likely limiting equity) but grant principals flexibility on staffing, stipends, and contracts.
变异是常态:加权学生资助实施的景观分析
学区越来越依赖加权学生资助(WSF),但对这种分配模式的研究很少。这项研究在2018年使用WSF收集了19个地区的70多项措施,用于对公式特征和实施实践进行景观分析。虽然各地区报告了采用WSF的常见原因(公平、灵活性和透明度),但该研究没有发现标准的WSF模型。本土配方奶粉和反映当地情况的非配方奶粉特征和豁免是常态,导致了实质性差异。几乎所有地区都继续以平均工资进行预算(可能会限制公平性),但在人员配备、津贴和合同方面给予校长灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Budgeting and Finance
Public Budgeting and Finance PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Public Budgeting & Finance serves as a forum for the communication of research and experiences on all facets of government finance and provides meaningful exchange between research from universities, private and nonprofit research institutes, practitioners in public financial markets, government agencies, and the experience of those who practice government budgeting and finance. Researchers, practitioners, and teachers of applied government finance turn to Public Budgeting & Finance to find understandable, reliable, and thoughtful analysis of issues important in the field. The content of the journal spans the spectrum of budget process and policy and financial management, is never limited to one level of government or even to one country, and always even-handedly crosses disciplines and approaches in applied government finance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信