Verifying the chronology of Ukrainian Neolithic

IF 0.6 4区历史学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY

Praehistorische Zeitschrift Pub Date : 2023-09-02 DOI:10.1515/pz-2022-2058

Dmytro Kiosak, N. Kotova, Olha Demchenko, A. Bardeckyi, Dagmara H. Werra

{"title":"Verifying the chronology of Ukrainian Neolithic","authors":"Dmytro Kiosak, N. Kotova, Olha Demchenko, A. Bardeckyi, Dagmara H. Werra","doi":"10.1515/pz-2022-2058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper addresses the earliest Neolithic phases in Ukraine: aspects relating to the chronology, methods and time of Neolithisation. In general, the earliest Neolithisation relates to the times of the Linear Pottery culture. Nevertheless, Ukraine has numerous eco-zones so the process could have been different in other zones. The authors emphasize that the key to getting closer to solving this problem is the chronology-re-dating and validation program. Hitherto dates of one culture or period of culture have been treated against each other. This article presents a small series of AMS from well-defined contexts of four sites, previously dated by the Kyiv radiocarbon facility. The results are compared with existing dates in order to establish the validity of existing chronologies for the Neolithic of Ukraine. Obtained results allowed the authors to conclude that the Kyiv dates should not be obligatorily treated as wrong. Furthermore, the authors reopened the discussion to establish what was the role of LBK and Azov-Dnieper culture communities in spreading farming and herding in Ukraine during the second half of the VIth millennium BC.","PeriodicalId":44421,"journal":{"name":"Praehistorische Zeitschrift","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Praehistorische Zeitschrift","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pz-2022-2058","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract This paper addresses the earliest Neolithic phases in Ukraine: aspects relating to the chronology, methods and time of Neolithisation. In general, the earliest Neolithisation relates to the times of the Linear Pottery culture. Nevertheless, Ukraine has numerous eco-zones so the process could have been different in other zones. The authors emphasize that the key to getting closer to solving this problem is the chronology-re-dating and validation program. Hitherto dates of one culture or period of culture have been treated against each other. This article presents a small series of AMS from well-defined contexts of four sites, previously dated by the Kyiv radiocarbon facility. The results are compared with existing dates in order to establish the validity of existing chronologies for the Neolithic of Ukraine. Obtained results allowed the authors to conclude that the Kyiv dates should not be obligatorily treated as wrong. Furthermore, the authors reopened the discussion to establish what was the role of LBK and Azov-Dnieper culture communities in spreading farming and herding in Ukraine during the second half of the VIth millennium BC.

查看原文本刊更多论文

验证乌克兰新石器时代的年表

摘要本文论述了乌克兰最早的新石器时代阶段:与新石器时代的年代学、方法和时间有关的方面。一般来说，最早的新石器时代与线形陶器文化的时代有关。然而，乌克兰有许多生态区，因此其他地区的过程可能会有所不同。作者强调，接近解决这个问题的关键是年代重新确定和验证程序。迄今为止，一种文化或一段文化时期的日期一直是相互对立的。这篇文章提出了一个小系列的AMS从四个地点的定义良好的背景，以前由基辅放射性碳设施定年。将结果与现有日期进行比较，以确定乌克兰新石器时代现有年表的有效性。所获得的结果使发件人得出结论，基辅日期不应被强制视为错误。此外，作者重新展开了讨论，以确定LBK和亚速夫-第聂伯河文化社区在公元前六千年下半叶在乌克兰传播农业和畜牧业方面的作用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Praehistorische Zeitschrift Multiple-

CiteScore

1.30

自引率

16.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Praehistorische Zeitschrift is regarded as one of the most renowned German publications in the area of Prehistory and Ancient History. In keeping with its traditional mission, it presents detailed accounts of the most recent research conducted in Europe. The geographical emphasis is placed on Eastern, South-Eastern and Northern Central Europe. A comprehensive review section deals with recent German and international monographs from the field of prehistoric archaeology. Contributions are published in German, English or French, with a brief abstract in the other two languages; if necessary, a summary is provided in the author"s native language.