Textual resources in the classroom: the challenge of integrating critical approaches

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Catarina Schmidt, Maria Skoog
{"title":"Textual resources in the classroom: the challenge of integrating critical approaches","authors":"Catarina Schmidt, Maria Skoog","doi":"10.1080/1554480x.2019.1706525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper focuses on teachers’ and students’ use of textual resources offline and online in two Grade 6 classrooms. Using analysis of video recordings, the paper presents the ways in which the textual resources are used, and what critical approaches emerge within the teachers’ and students’ repertoires of teaching and learning. We then investigate what characterizes these repertoires and discuss consequences and possibilities for students’ own learning talk in relation to critical approaches and with regard to diversity and participation. The analysis reveals that it is when students ask authentic questions or respond to their teachers’ or peers’ reflections, that critical approaches appear in relation to content, the surrounding world and themselves. Drawing on the results, we argue that these critical approaches can be deepened in relation to ethical issues, source criticism and redesign, and regardless of whether textual resources are online or offline. Since Swedish national curriculum standards have contributed towards a greater focus on knowledge outcomes, we are concerned that processes of meaning making and criticality might be downplayed. We believe that one of the biggest challenges for future education is how criticality can be linked to teaching and learning in dialogic ways.","PeriodicalId":45770,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1554480x.2019.1706525","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480x.2019.1706525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper focuses on teachers’ and students’ use of textual resources offline and online in two Grade 6 classrooms. Using analysis of video recordings, the paper presents the ways in which the textual resources are used, and what critical approaches emerge within the teachers’ and students’ repertoires of teaching and learning. We then investigate what characterizes these repertoires and discuss consequences and possibilities for students’ own learning talk in relation to critical approaches and with regard to diversity and participation. The analysis reveals that it is when students ask authentic questions or respond to their teachers’ or peers’ reflections, that critical approaches appear in relation to content, the surrounding world and themselves. Drawing on the results, we argue that these critical approaches can be deepened in relation to ethical issues, source criticism and redesign, and regardless of whether textual resources are online or offline. Since Swedish national curriculum standards have contributed towards a greater focus on knowledge outcomes, we are concerned that processes of meaning making and criticality might be downplayed. We believe that one of the biggest challenges for future education is how criticality can be linked to teaching and learning in dialogic ways.
课堂中的文本资源:整合批判性方法的挑战
摘要本文主要研究六年级两个教室教师和学生在线下使用文本资源的情况。通过对录像的分析,本文介绍了文本资源的使用方式,以及在教师和学生的教学剧目中出现了哪些批评方法。然后,我们调查了这些曲目的特点,并讨论了学生自己的学习演讲在批判性方法以及多样性和参与方面的后果和可能性。分析表明,只有当学生提出真实的问题或回应老师或同龄人的反思时,批判性方法才会与内容、周围世界和他们自己有关。根据研究结果,我们认为,无论文本资源是在线还是离线,这些批判性方法都可以在伦理问题、来源批评和重新设计方面得到深化。由于瑞典国家课程标准有助于更加关注知识成果,我们担心意义形成和关键性的过程可能会被淡化。我们认为,未来教育面临的最大挑战之一是如何以对话的方式将批判性与教学联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pedagogies
Pedagogies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信