Application of Concepts of the Analytic Hierarchy Process in Decision-Making

IF 1.4 Q4 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
T. Krenický, L. Hrebenyk, V.S. Chernobrovchenko
{"title":"Application of Concepts of the Analytic Hierarchy Process in Decision-Making","authors":"T. Krenický, L. Hrebenyk, V.S. Chernobrovchenko","doi":"10.2478/mspe-2022-0039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is one of the multi-criteria methods with tools that are effective for decision-making in complementary or alternative medicine (CAM). This approach, in combination with other available methods, such as the Utrecht Method, allows medical professionals and patients themselves to take a balanced choice of special treatment and health control. This is particularly important for pregnant women who suffer from nausea and vomiting during pregnancy (NVP). The mechanisms of toxicosis occur, and the way of treatment have certain uncertainties. The decision-making process for therapeutic care must consider several factors, the determination of which is the result of collaboration between the patient and the healthcare provider. This paper presents the results of a decision-making study regarding the use of the ginger medicinal plant in helping a woman with NVP symptoms. The research was conducted using the original questionnaire according to the methodology proposed by the developers of the Utrecht Method. The chosen respondents were healthcare professionals with experience in treating NVP and pregnant women. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) capabilities in decision-making were shown in an example of analyzing the benefits, risks, and side effects of using ginger during pregnancy. The combination of two methodological approaches allowed to successfully connect the proven facts of using CAM therapy with the subjective assessment of all stakeholders. The study demonstrates that this approach successfully uses decision-making by structuring hierarchical decision elements and weighing the criteria involved in the decision-making issue. The article examines the practicality and effectiveness of using AHP when making decisions regarding the treatment and improvement of the condition of pregnant women with NVP, and summarizes the quantitative and qualitative indicators of the effectiveness of this method. The presented combination of two methodological approaches in decision-making allows for choosing an optimized medical strategy for supporting pregnant women through CAM therapy.","PeriodicalId":44097,"journal":{"name":"Management Systems in Production Engineering","volume":"30 1","pages":"304 - 310"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Systems in Production Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/mspe-2022-0039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is one of the multi-criteria methods with tools that are effective for decision-making in complementary or alternative medicine (CAM). This approach, in combination with other available methods, such as the Utrecht Method, allows medical professionals and patients themselves to take a balanced choice of special treatment and health control. This is particularly important for pregnant women who suffer from nausea and vomiting during pregnancy (NVP). The mechanisms of toxicosis occur, and the way of treatment have certain uncertainties. The decision-making process for therapeutic care must consider several factors, the determination of which is the result of collaboration between the patient and the healthcare provider. This paper presents the results of a decision-making study regarding the use of the ginger medicinal plant in helping a woman with NVP symptoms. The research was conducted using the original questionnaire according to the methodology proposed by the developers of the Utrecht Method. The chosen respondents were healthcare professionals with experience in treating NVP and pregnant women. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) capabilities in decision-making were shown in an example of analyzing the benefits, risks, and side effects of using ginger during pregnancy. The combination of two methodological approaches allowed to successfully connect the proven facts of using CAM therapy with the subjective assessment of all stakeholders. The study demonstrates that this approach successfully uses decision-making by structuring hierarchical decision elements and weighing the criteria involved in the decision-making issue. The article examines the practicality and effectiveness of using AHP when making decisions regarding the treatment and improvement of the condition of pregnant women with NVP, and summarizes the quantitative and qualitative indicators of the effectiveness of this method. The presented combination of two methodological approaches in decision-making allows for choosing an optimized medical strategy for supporting pregnant women through CAM therapy.
层次分析法概念在决策中的应用
层次分析法(AHP)是辅助或替代医学(CAM)决策的一种有效的多准则方法和工具。这种方法与乌得勒支方法等其他现有方法相结合,使医疗专业人员和患者自己能够在特殊治疗和健康控制方面作出平衡的选择。这对怀孕期间恶心和呕吐的孕妇尤其重要。中毒的发生机制和治疗方法都有一定的不确定性。治疗护理的决策过程必须考虑几个因素,确定哪些是患者和医疗保健提供者之间协作的结果。本文提出了一项决策研究的结果,关于使用生姜药用植物在帮助妇女NVP症状。研究是根据乌得勒支方法的开发者提出的方法,使用原始问卷进行的。选择的应答者是具有治疗NVP和孕妇经验的保健专业人员。分析层次分析法(AHP)在决策中的能力,在一个例子中分析了在怀孕期间使用生姜的好处,风险和副作用。两种方法方法的结合允许成功地将使用CAM疗法的已证实事实与所有利益相关者的主观评估联系起来。研究表明,该方法通过构建分层决策元素和权衡决策问题中涉及的标准,成功地使用了决策。本文考察了运用层次分析法对NVP孕妇病情的治疗和改善决策的实用性和有效性,并总结了该方法有效性的定量和定性指标。提出的两种决策方法的组合允许选择一个优化的医疗策略,通过辅助生殖疗法支持孕妇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
48
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信