Opinions of Intensive Care Nurses: Traditional or Disposable Wipes Bed Bath? A Quasi-Qualitative and Cost Analysis Study

Funda Büyükyılmaz, Merdiye Şendir
{"title":"Opinions of Intensive Care Nurses: Traditional or Disposable Wipes Bed Bath? A Quasi-Qualitative and Cost Analysis Study","authors":"Funda Büyükyılmaz, Merdiye Şendir","doi":"10.15344/2394-4978/2017/269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study is to compare the traditional basin with the disposable washcloths bed bath in terms of two outcomes: ICU nurses’ satisfaction/preference and cost analysis. Methods: This is a quasi-qualitative and descriptive study was performed in three ICUs (orthopaedic, neurosurgery, and general surgical) at a university hospital. The sample consisted of 41 ICU nurses agreed to participate in the study. The ICU nurses used a visual analogue scale to respond to the questions about the two types of bed-baths. The researchers conducted interviews with ICU nurses about the two bedbath practices based on open-ended questions. The interview, lasting for 20-30 minutes, was administered during a rest period. A cost analysis was calculated by researchers based on equipment and workload. Results: The application time, workload of nurses, and cost analysis scores favoured the disposable bedbath method (p≤0.05). The traditional bed-bath application scored higher than the disposable washcloth application in parameters (performing, providing communication to the patient, patient feedback, cleanliness, integrity, and softness of skin) (p≤0.01). ICU nurses reported that the three most important parameters that affect the preference for the traditional bed-bath application are communication with patients, patient satisfaction feedback, and the cleanness and integrity of skin. Conclusion: Disposable bed-bath method was performed less time, less workload of nurses, and cost effective than traditional method. Furthermore the ICU nurses preferred the traditional bed bath application. Researchers determined that a bridge between cultural habits and nursing science should be established.","PeriodicalId":91514,"journal":{"name":"International journal of nursing & clinical practices","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of nursing & clinical practices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15344/2394-4978/2017/269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: This study is to compare the traditional basin with the disposable washcloths bed bath in terms of two outcomes: ICU nurses’ satisfaction/preference and cost analysis. Methods: This is a quasi-qualitative and descriptive study was performed in three ICUs (orthopaedic, neurosurgery, and general surgical) at a university hospital. The sample consisted of 41 ICU nurses agreed to participate in the study. The ICU nurses used a visual analogue scale to respond to the questions about the two types of bed-baths. The researchers conducted interviews with ICU nurses about the two bedbath practices based on open-ended questions. The interview, lasting for 20-30 minutes, was administered during a rest period. A cost analysis was calculated by researchers based on equipment and workload. Results: The application time, workload of nurses, and cost analysis scores favoured the disposable bedbath method (p≤0.05). The traditional bed-bath application scored higher than the disposable washcloth application in parameters (performing, providing communication to the patient, patient feedback, cleanliness, integrity, and softness of skin) (p≤0.01). ICU nurses reported that the three most important parameters that affect the preference for the traditional bed-bath application are communication with patients, patient satisfaction feedback, and the cleanness and integrity of skin. Conclusion: Disposable bed-bath method was performed less time, less workload of nurses, and cost effective than traditional method. Furthermore the ICU nurses preferred the traditional bed bath application. Researchers determined that a bridge between cultural habits and nursing science should be established.
重症监护护士的看法:传统还是一次性擦拭床浴?准定性与成本分析研究
背景:本研究从ICU护士满意度/偏好和成本分析两方面比较传统面盆与一次性毛巾床浴。方法:这是一项准定性和描述性研究,在一所大学医院的三个icu(骨科、神经外科和普通外科)中进行。样本包括41名同意参与研究的ICU护士。ICU护士使用视觉模拟量表来回答关于两种类型的床浴的问题。研究人员在开放式问题的基础上对ICU护士进行了关于两种洗澡做法的访谈。访谈持续20-30分钟,在休息期间进行。研究人员根据设备和工作量计算了成本分析。结果:使用时间、护士工作量、成本分析得分均倾向于使用一次性浴盆法(p≤0.05)。传统床浴应用在各项指标(执行、与患者沟通、患者反馈、皮肤清洁度、完整性、柔软度)得分均高于一次性毛巾应用(p≤0.01)。ICU护士报告说,影响传统床浴应用偏好的三个最重要的参数是与患者的沟通、患者满意度反馈和皮肤的清洁和完整性。结论:与传统方法相比,一次性床浴法使用时间短,护士工作量少,成本低。此外,ICU护士更喜欢传统的床浴应用。研究人员认为,应该在文化习惯和护理科学之间建立一座桥梁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信