European legislation and live bivalve molluscs: Are the criteria for microbiological safety matching with the criteria for sanitary classification of harvesting areas?

IF 1.8 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
C. Ciccarelli, M. Leinoudi, A. M. Semeraro, Vittoria Di Trani, Elena Ciccarelli, Gaia Consorti
{"title":"European legislation and live bivalve molluscs: Are the criteria for microbiological safety matching with the criteria for sanitary classification of harvesting areas?","authors":"C. Ciccarelli, M. Leinoudi, A. M. Semeraro, Vittoria Di Trani, Elena Ciccarelli, Gaia Consorti","doi":"10.4081/ijfs.2022.9956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The European Union (EU) established the criteria for the classification of shellfish harvesting areas, based on the results of monitoring E. coli in shellfish. The EU also defined E. coli as a microbiological criterion for end product safety, based on a three-class sampling plan. Both criteria are based on the MPN method, a test with a statistical approach and in which different factors contribute to the variability of the outcomes. This theoretical study, based on combinatorics and Bayes’ theorem for conditional probability, investigates the consistency between these two criteria and aims to determine the probability of obtaining false compliant and non-compliant results when applying the safety criterion test to shellfish placed on the market. The results show that in the second case, the probability of non-compliant outcomes does not appear negligible within a range between 10% and 50% in the different hypothesized scenarios, with a probability of false noncompliant outcomes over 10%. In addition, the Bayes’ Theorem shows that Class A, or Class B areas (as allowed), could be the origin of non-compliant shellfish, with a not negligible frequency. Therefore, within the limits of the assumed working hypotheses, the safety criterion for E. coli, as described in Regulation EC/2073/2005, does not appear to be consistent and coordinated with the classification criteria stated in the Regulation EU/2019/627 and it is not closely related to the sanitary status of shellfish harvesting area.","PeriodicalId":14508,"journal":{"name":"Italian Journal of Food Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian Journal of Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/ijfs.2022.9956","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The European Union (EU) established the criteria for the classification of shellfish harvesting areas, based on the results of monitoring E. coli in shellfish. The EU also defined E. coli as a microbiological criterion for end product safety, based on a three-class sampling plan. Both criteria are based on the MPN method, a test with a statistical approach and in which different factors contribute to the variability of the outcomes. This theoretical study, based on combinatorics and Bayes’ theorem for conditional probability, investigates the consistency between these two criteria and aims to determine the probability of obtaining false compliant and non-compliant results when applying the safety criterion test to shellfish placed on the market. The results show that in the second case, the probability of non-compliant outcomes does not appear negligible within a range between 10% and 50% in the different hypothesized scenarios, with a probability of false noncompliant outcomes over 10%. In addition, the Bayes’ Theorem shows that Class A, or Class B areas (as allowed), could be the origin of non-compliant shellfish, with a not negligible frequency. Therefore, within the limits of the assumed working hypotheses, the safety criterion for E. coli, as described in Regulation EC/2073/2005, does not appear to be consistent and coordinated with the classification criteria stated in the Regulation EU/2019/627 and it is not closely related to the sanitary status of shellfish harvesting area.
欧洲立法和活的双壳类软体动物:微生物安全标准是否与采集区卫生分类标准相匹配?
欧洲联盟(欧盟)根据贝类中大肠杆菌的监测结果,制定了贝类捕捞区的分类标准。欧盟还根据三级抽样计划,将大肠杆菌定义为最终产品安全的微生物标准。这两个标准都基于MPN方法,这是一种采用统计方法的测试,其中不同的因素会导致结果的可变性。这项理论研究基于组合数学和条件概率的贝叶斯定理,研究了这两个标准之间的一致性,旨在确定在将安全标准测试应用于市场上的贝类时,获得虚假符合和不符合结果的概率。结果表明,在第二种情况下,在不同的假设场景中,不符合结果的概率在10%至50%之间的范围内似乎不可忽略,虚假不符合结果概率超过10%。此外,贝叶斯定理表明,A类或B类区域(如允许)可能是不合规贝类的起源地,其频率不可忽略。因此,在假设的工作假设范围内,条例EC/2073/2005中描述的大肠杆菌安全标准似乎与条例EU/2019/627中描述的分类标准不一致和不协调,也与贝类捕捞区的卫生状况没有密切关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Italian Journal of Food Safety
Italian Journal of Food Safety FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Safety (IJFS) is the official journal of the Italian Association of Veterinary Food Hygienists (AIVI). The Journal addresses veterinary food hygienists, specialists in the food industry and experts offering technical support and advice on food of animal origin. The Journal of Food Safety publishes original research papers concerning food safety and hygiene, animal health, zoonoses and food safety, food safety economics. Reviews, editorials, technical reports, brief notes, conference proceedings, letters to the Editor, book reviews are also welcome. Every article published in the Journal will be peer-reviewed by experts in the field and selected by members of the editorial board. The publication of manuscripts is subject to the approval of the Editor who has knowledge of the field discussed in the manuscript in accordance with the principles of Peer Review; referees will be selected from the Editorial Board or among qualified scientists of the international scientific community. Articles must be written in English and must adhere to the guidelines and details contained in the Instructions to Authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信