Development and validation of the Just Community Gardening Survey: A measure of the social and dietary outcomes of community garden participation

Q3 Social Sciences
Kate G. Burt, Kathleen Delgado
{"title":"Development and validation of the Just Community Gardening Survey: A measure of the social and dietary outcomes of community garden participation","authors":"Kate G. Burt, Kathleen Delgado","doi":"10.5070/G314343693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author(s): Burt, Kate G.; Delgado, Kathleen | Abstract: Our aim was to develop and validate a survey measuring outcomes of community gardening related to food system equity. Face validity was assessed by six community gardening experts and resulted in minor changes to the survey. Weighted kappa and Cronbach’s alpha were used to determine test-retest reliability and internal consistency using a sample of community gardeners in New York City (n=38). Weighted kappa analyses revealed almost perfect agreement (mean = 0.981, range 0.498-1, p≤.001). Cronbach’s alpha was calculated for eight scales, most of which had excellent agreement. The resulting 25-item Just Community Gardening Survey consisted of demographic, garden participation, garden activities, social participation, social cohesion, collective efficacy, perceived impact on dietary intake, food access and security, horticultural and environmental knowledge and diet-related health questions. This validated survey not only measures the social and dietary outcomes of community gardening, it incorporates important aspects of food justice not assessed in previous research.","PeriodicalId":38802,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Green Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5070/G314343693","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Green Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5070/G314343693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Author(s): Burt, Kate G.; Delgado, Kathleen | Abstract: Our aim was to develop and validate a survey measuring outcomes of community gardening related to food system equity. Face validity was assessed by six community gardening experts and resulted in minor changes to the survey. Weighted kappa and Cronbach’s alpha were used to determine test-retest reliability and internal consistency using a sample of community gardeners in New York City (n=38). Weighted kappa analyses revealed almost perfect agreement (mean = 0.981, range 0.498-1, p≤.001). Cronbach’s alpha was calculated for eight scales, most of which had excellent agreement. The resulting 25-item Just Community Gardening Survey consisted of demographic, garden participation, garden activities, social participation, social cohesion, collective efficacy, perceived impact on dietary intake, food access and security, horticultural and environmental knowledge and diet-related health questions. This validated survey not only measures the social and dietary outcomes of community gardening, it incorporates important aspects of food justice not assessed in previous research.
公正社区园艺调查的发展和验证:衡量社区园艺参与的社会和饮食结果
作者:伯特,凯特G.;摘要:我们的目的是开发和验证一项衡量社区园艺与食物系统公平相关结果的调查。六名社区园艺专家对面部有效性进行了评估,并对调查结果进行了细微的修改。加权kappa和Cronbach’s alpha用于确定纽约市社区园丁样本的重测信度和内部一致性(n=38)。加权kappa分析显示几乎完全一致(平均值= 0.981,范围0.498-1,p≤0.001)。Cronbach 's alpha计算了8个量表,其中大多数具有很好的一致性。Just社区园艺调查共有25个项目,包括人口统计、园艺参与、园艺活动、社会参与、社会凝聚力、集体效能、对饮食摄入的感知影响、食物获取和安全、园艺和环境知识以及与饮食相关的健康问题。这项经过验证的调查不仅衡量了社区园艺的社会和饮食结果,还纳入了以前研究中未评估的食物正义的重要方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Electronic Green Journal
Electronic Green Journal Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信