Empirical and numerical study of the static lateral response of socketed pile in Dubai sedimentary rock

IF 1.6 Q3 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
O. Mughieda, A. Alzo’ubi, Marwan Alzaylaie, Ramesh Vandanapu, Akash Sharma
{"title":"Empirical and numerical study of the static lateral response of socketed pile in Dubai sedimentary rock","authors":"O. Mughieda, A. Alzo’ubi, Marwan Alzaylaie, Ramesh Vandanapu, Akash Sharma","doi":"10.1680/jgere.22.00032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In geotechnical engineering practice, it is often a challenging task to select suitable method for calculation of lateral load capacity of piles. In Dubai (United Arab Emirates), predominantly piles are rock socketed with top layers commonly medium dense to dense sand or Dubai sedimentary rock contributing to bearing lateral loads. In present study, two lateral load field test results on piles were selected and used for evaluating various methods adopted by local geotechnical engineers. The ground lithology for piles selected constitutes medium dense to dense sand for top layers, which is critical in evaluation of lateral capacity of piles. Due to simpler input requirements and quicker calculations, generally, Brom’s method or p-y non-linear analysis are adopted by local geo-engineers for lateral load analysis of piles. With advancement in computing capabilities, geotechnical engineers also adopt numerical analyses. As part of this study, various methods adopted were evaluated in terms of their advantages, limitations, and accuracy in predicting the lateral load behavior of piles. Commonly adopted methodologies like Brom’s method were found to have limitations that underestimate pile capacities resulting in overdesign of pile sizes leading to higher costs, whereas comparatively, numerical approaches predicts more accurately the lateral load behavior of piles.","PeriodicalId":44054,"journal":{"name":"Geotechnical Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geotechnical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jgere.22.00032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In geotechnical engineering practice, it is often a challenging task to select suitable method for calculation of lateral load capacity of piles. In Dubai (United Arab Emirates), predominantly piles are rock socketed with top layers commonly medium dense to dense sand or Dubai sedimentary rock contributing to bearing lateral loads. In present study, two lateral load field test results on piles were selected and used for evaluating various methods adopted by local geotechnical engineers. The ground lithology for piles selected constitutes medium dense to dense sand for top layers, which is critical in evaluation of lateral capacity of piles. Due to simpler input requirements and quicker calculations, generally, Brom’s method or p-y non-linear analysis are adopted by local geo-engineers for lateral load analysis of piles. With advancement in computing capabilities, geotechnical engineers also adopt numerical analyses. As part of this study, various methods adopted were evaluated in terms of their advantages, limitations, and accuracy in predicting the lateral load behavior of piles. Commonly adopted methodologies like Brom’s method were found to have limitations that underestimate pile capacities resulting in overdesign of pile sizes leading to higher costs, whereas comparatively, numerical approaches predicts more accurately the lateral load behavior of piles.
迪拜沉积岩中嵌套桩静侧向响应的经验与数值研究
在岩土工程实践中,选择合适的方法来计算桩的横向承载力往往是一项具有挑战性的任务。在迪拜(阿拉伯联合酋长国),桩主要嵌岩,顶层通常为中密至密实的沙子或迪拜沉积岩,有助于承受横向荷载。在本研究中,选择了两个桩的横向荷载场试验结果,并用于评估当地岩土工程师采用的各种方法。所选桩的地面岩性为表层中密至密实砂,这对评估桩的横向承载力至关重要。由于输入要求更简单,计算速度更快,当地地质工程师通常采用Brom方法或p-y非线性分析来进行桩的横向荷载分析。随着计算能力的提高,岩土工程师也采用了数值分析。作为本研究的一部分,评估了所采用的各种方法在预测桩的横向荷载特性方面的优势、局限性和准确性。Brom方法等常用方法被发现存在低估桩承载力的局限性,导致桩尺寸的过度设计导致更高的成本,而相对而言,数值方法更准确地预测了桩的横向荷载行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geotechnical Research
Geotechnical Research ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
26.30%
发文量
22
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geotechnical Research covers the full scope of geotechnics and its related disciplines including: Soil, rock and fluid mechanics; geoenvironmental engineering; geothermal engineering; geotechnical design and construction issues; analytical and numerical methods; physical modelling; micromechanics; transportation geotechnics; engineering geology; environmental geotechnology; geochemistry; geohydrology and water management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信