Ideological Boundary-Making: Representing Immigrants in an Anti-Immigration Party

Q3 Social Sciences

Swiss Journal of Sociology Pub Date : 2021-03-01 DOI:10.2478/sjs-2021-0011

D. Bader, Alexandra Feddersen

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract How can migrant organisations affiliated to anti-immigration political parties reconcile their party’s ideology with the representation of immigrants? Based on a website content analysis, this article investigates the representative claims of a migrant group affiliated to the Swiss People’s Party. Comparing them to the discourse of its left-wing counterpart, the findings show that the group sets ideological boundaries between immigrants, establishing a hierarchy that enables it to contrast its members with the immigrants targeted by its party.

查看原文本刊更多论文

意识形态边界的划定:一个反移民政党中的移民代表

附属于反移民政党的移民组织如何调和其政党的意识形态与移民的代表?本文通过对一个网站内容的分析，对瑞士人民党下属的一个移民团体的代表性诉求进行了调查。将其与左翼同行的言论进行比较，研究结果表明，该组织在移民之间设定了意识形态界限，建立了一种等级制度，使其能够将其成员与该党所针对的移民进行对比。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Swiss Journal of Sociology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

50 weeks

期刊介绍： The Swiss Journal of Sociology was established in 1975 on the initiative of the Swiss Sociological Association. It is published by Seismo and appears three times a year with the support of the Swiss Academy of Humanities and Social Sciences. Since 2016, all the articles of the Swiss Journal of Sociology are available as open access documents on De Gruyter Open: https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/sjs The journal is a multilingual voice for analysis and research in sociology. It publishes work on the theory, methods, practice, and history of the social sciences in English, French, or German. Although a central aim of the Journal is to reflect the state of the discipline in Switzerland as well as current developments, articles, research notes, debates, and book reviews will be accepted irrespective of the author’s nationality or whether the submitted work focuses on this country. The journal is understood as a representative medium and therefore open to all research areas, to a plurality of schools and methodological approaches. It neither favours nor excludes any research orientation but particularly intends to promote communication between different perspectives. In order to fulfil this aim, all submissions will be refereed anonymously by at least two reviewers.