Do Job Attitudes Mediate the Relationships Between Triarchic Psychopathy Domains and Organizational Citizenship Behavior?

Q4 Psychology

Roczniki Psychologiczne Pub Date : 2023-07-07 DOI:10.18290/rpsych2023.0010

Elżbieta Sanecka

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study investigated how triarchic psychopathy domains are related to self-rated organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) and whether job attitudes, such as job satisfaction and affective commitment, mediate these relationships. Results from a sample of 434 employees indicated that OCB was positively correlated with boldness, negatively with meanness, and uncorrelated with disinhibition. Structural equation modeling (SEM) demonstrated that job satisfaction and affective commitment were positively predicted by boldness and negatively by meanness. In addition, disinhibition positively predicted affective commitment. With regard to job attitudes–OCB associations, only affective commitment significantly positively predicted OCB, suggesting its mediating role in the relationships between psychopathy dimensions and OCB. These findings contribute to the literature on the underpinnings of behavioral manifestations of psychopathy in the organizational context by proposing the potential attitudinal mechanism underlying the relationships between triarchic psychopathy domains and OCB.

查看原文本刊更多论文

工作态度是否中介三重型精神病态域与组织公民行为的关系?

本研究探讨了三型精神病态域与自评组织公民行为(OCB)的关系，以及工作态度(如工作满意度和情感承诺)是否在这些关系中起中介作用。对434名员工的调查结果表明，组织公民行为与大胆正相关，与卑鄙负相关，与去抑制不相关。结构方程模型(SEM)显示，大胆对工作满意度和情感承诺有正向预测作用，吝啬对工作满意度和情感承诺有负向预测作用。此外，去抑制正向预测情感承诺。在工作态度与组织行为的关系中，只有情感承诺显著正向预测组织行为，表明其在精神病态维度与组织行为的关系中起中介作用。这些发现通过提出潜在的态度机制，为组织背景下的精神病态行为表现提供了基础。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Roczniki Psychologiczne Psychology-Psychology (all)

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Roczniki Psychologiczne / Annals of Psychology, the continuation of Annals of Philosophy: Psychology, is an academic journal edited by The Scientific Society of the John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin [Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL]. It aims to present up-to-date and original empirical results and influential theoretical considerations in various areas of psychology as well as to promote new and creative ideas in research and psychological methods. The Journal accepts contributions of three kinds: 1) original peer reviewed articles on both empirical and conceptual topics, 2) short communications, and 3) polemics, which consist of a focus article followed by peer commentaries and a response by the author of the focus article.