KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP MALPRAKTIK MEDIS PADA RUMAH SAKIT

Anny Retnowati, E. Sundari
{"title":"KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP MALPRAKTIK MEDIS PADA RUMAH SAKIT","authors":"Anny Retnowati, E. Sundari","doi":"10.24002/jep.v37i1.3303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Malpractice still occurs a lot, both by hospitals and doctors, although there are several legal instruments that regulate hospitals, as well as medical practice with sanctions for violators of health laws. The purpose of this study is to explore the deficiencies that exist in legal policies, and to propose new legal policies in order to optimally prevent and overcome hospital malpractice. The research method used is a normative research method by examining aspects of criminal law in health law concerning malpractice, as well as theories and expert opinions for better legal policy proposals. From the qualitative analysis of primary and secondary legal material data, the following results were obtained: first, there are weaknesses in the health law policy so that it cannot prevent and overcome malpractice optimally, namely incompleteness and lack of clarity regarding the formulation of malpractice and its strict sanctions, as well as a turn towards acts against the law and the limitations of the hospital's responsibility for malpractice committed by doctors or medical personnel. Second, a new legal policy that can be proposed, namely by clearly formulating and detailing the limits of hospital malpractice in health law, accompanied by strict sanctions or accountability both criminal, civil, and administrative, the hospital is also responsible for malpractice committed by doctors with conditions in certain conditions, procedural law must be lex specialis by, for example, imposing strict liability.","PeriodicalId":52874,"journal":{"name":"Justitia Et Pax","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Justitia Et Pax","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24002/jep.v37i1.3303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Malpractice still occurs a lot, both by hospitals and doctors, although there are several legal instruments that regulate hospitals, as well as medical practice with sanctions for violators of health laws. The purpose of this study is to explore the deficiencies that exist in legal policies, and to propose new legal policies in order to optimally prevent and overcome hospital malpractice. The research method used is a normative research method by examining aspects of criminal law in health law concerning malpractice, as well as theories and expert opinions for better legal policy proposals. From the qualitative analysis of primary and secondary legal material data, the following results were obtained: first, there are weaknesses in the health law policy so that it cannot prevent and overcome malpractice optimally, namely incompleteness and lack of clarity regarding the formulation of malpractice and its strict sanctions, as well as a turn towards acts against the law and the limitations of the hospital's responsibility for malpractice committed by doctors or medical personnel. Second, a new legal policy that can be proposed, namely by clearly formulating and detailing the limits of hospital malpractice in health law, accompanied by strict sanctions or accountability both criminal, civil, and administrative, the hospital is also responsible for malpractice committed by doctors with conditions in certain conditions, procedural law must be lex specialis by, for example, imposing strict liability.
皮达纳的人类生物学与香囊之家有着不切实际的医学实践
尽管有一些法律文书对医院进行了监管,但医院和医生的不当行为仍然经常发生,医疗实践也对违反卫生法的人进行了制裁。本研究的目的是探索法律政策中存在的不足,并提出新的法律政策,以最佳地预防和克服医院渎职行为。所使用的研究方法是一种规范性的研究方法,通过审查卫生法中有关渎职的刑法方面,以及理论和专家意见,以获得更好的法律政策建议。通过对一级和二级法律材料数据的定性分析,得出以下结果:首先,卫生法政策存在缺陷,无法最佳地预防和克服渎职行为,即渎职行为的制定及其严格制裁不完整、不明确,以及转向违反法律和限制医院对医生或医务人员渎职行为的责任。第二,可以提出一项新的法律政策,即通过在卫生法中明确制定和详细规定医院渎职行为的限制,并伴随着刑事、民事和行政方面的严格制裁或问责,医院也要对医生在某些条件下犯下的渎职行为负责,例如,规定严格的责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信