Themed issue: Methodological pluralism and innovation to advance strategic organization research in organizations and fields

IF 5.2 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Amit Nigam, M. Guerra
{"title":"Themed issue: Methodological pluralism and innovation to advance strategic organization research in organizations and fields","authors":"Amit Nigam, M. Guerra","doi":"10.1177/14761270231184668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Strategic Organization (SO!) launched its first issue 20 years ago with an explicit commitment to developing theoretically and methodologically pluralist research that sat at the intersection of, and helped integrate, the increasingly divergent fields of strategic management research and organizational theory (Baum et al., 2022). Over the past 20 years, this pluralism has enabled creativity and innovation in the work published in the journal. The methodological pluralism also sets it apart, in particular, from journals in strategy. This pluralism is something that is nurtured explicitly in the journal’s editorial process. Features of this process, including the one major revision policy, and an editorial process that is attentive both to the author’s voice and for empirical pieces, the voice of the data (Because data speaks! We cannot let established theory prevent us from hearing!) are, in the editorial team’s view, sources of innovation. The pieces in this issue reflect this commitment to pluralism and the author (and data’s) voice. In addition, they are testament to the idea that leveraging pluralism is a way of advancing theory. Two of us collaborated on this piece from the perspective of a co-editor at SO! (A.N.) and from the perspective of a junior scholar of strategic organization whose research programme takes a methodologically plural approach (M.G.). Both of these perspectives were essential, in particular, for situating the specific papers in this issue into a broader reflection on the values of pluralism.","PeriodicalId":22087,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Organization","volume":"21 1","pages":"495 - 500"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Organization","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270231184668","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Strategic Organization (SO!) launched its first issue 20 years ago with an explicit commitment to developing theoretically and methodologically pluralist research that sat at the intersection of, and helped integrate, the increasingly divergent fields of strategic management research and organizational theory (Baum et al., 2022). Over the past 20 years, this pluralism has enabled creativity and innovation in the work published in the journal. The methodological pluralism also sets it apart, in particular, from journals in strategy. This pluralism is something that is nurtured explicitly in the journal’s editorial process. Features of this process, including the one major revision policy, and an editorial process that is attentive both to the author’s voice and for empirical pieces, the voice of the data (Because data speaks! We cannot let established theory prevent us from hearing!) are, in the editorial team’s view, sources of innovation. The pieces in this issue reflect this commitment to pluralism and the author (and data’s) voice. In addition, they are testament to the idea that leveraging pluralism is a way of advancing theory. Two of us collaborated on this piece from the perspective of a co-editor at SO! (A.N.) and from the perspective of a junior scholar of strategic organization whose research programme takes a methodologically plural approach (M.G.). Both of these perspectives were essential, in particular, for situating the specific papers in this issue into a broader reflection on the values of pluralism.
主题议题:推进组织和领域战略组织研究的方法论多元化和创新
《战略组织》(SO!)于20年前推出了第一期,明确致力于发展理论和方法上的多元研究,这些研究处于战略管理研究和组织理论日益分化的领域的交叉点,并有助于整合这些领域(Baum et al.,2022)。在过去的20年里,这种多元化使该杂志发表的作品具有创造性和创新性。方法论的多元主义也使它在战略上与期刊特别不同。这种多元化是在杂志的编辑过程中明确培养出来的。在编辑团队看来,这一过程的特点,包括一项重大的修订政策,以及关注作者声音和实证文章的编辑过程,数据的声音(因为数据说话!我们不能让既定的理论阻止我们听到!)是创新的来源。本期文章反映了作者(和数据)对多元化的承诺。此外,它们证明了利用多元主义是推进理论的一种方式。我们两人从SO的一位联合编辑的角度合作了这篇文章!(A.N.),以及从一位研究战略组织的初级学者的角度来看,他的研究计划采用了方法论上的多元方法(M.G.)。这两种观点对于将这一问题中的具体论文置于对多元价值观的更广泛反思中尤其重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
8.20%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Strategic Organization is devoted to publishing high-quality, peer-reviewed, discipline-grounded conceptual and empirical research of interest to researchers, teachers, students, and practitioners of strategic management and organization. The journal also aims to be of considerable interest to senior managers in government, industry, and particularly the growing management consulting industry. Strategic Organization provides an international, interdisciplinary forum designed to improve our understanding of the interrelated dynamics of strategic and organizational processes and outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信