Incorporação da classificação NOVA na produção científica em alimentação e nutrição na América Latina: uma revisão cienciométrica

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Vivian Costa Resende Cunha, C. A. Borges, D. S. Canella
{"title":"Incorporação da classificação NOVA na produção científica em alimentação e nutrição na América Latina: uma revisão cienciométrica","authors":"Vivian Costa Resende Cunha, C. A. Borges, D. S. Canella","doi":"10.37527/2022.72.2.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2009, a food classification was proposed, called NOVA classification. Latin American countries have stood out in their use in nutritional recommendations and regulatory agenda. Objective. To evaluate how scientific production in food and nutrition in Latin America has incorporated the NOVA classification. Materials and methods. The analysis of scientific production was carried out from annals at the Latin American Congress of Nutrition (SLAN) in 2012, 2015 and 2018. The terms used for the search were: NOVA, ultra-processed, processed, processing and food guide, in Portuguese, English and Spanish. After the search, the exclusion and inclusion criteria were applied and the selected abstracts were described according to previously defined analytical variables. Results. A total of 153 were analyzed, 24 of which were published in 2012, 20 in 2015 and 109 in 2018. Most studies were carried out in Brazil (56,2%), followed by Mexico (12,4%) and involved adolescents (28,8%), adults (21,6%) and food (19,6%) as subject or unit of analysis. Most of the works were classified in the area of Public Health Nutrition (88,9%), were observational (82,3%) and used a quantitative method (76,5%). The sale and/or consumption of food (46,4%) and the food environment (24,2%) were the most common objects of study. Conclusion. The scientific production that considers the NOVA classification in Latin America increased in 2018, with Brazil and Mexico leading the development of studies. Studies that explore the relationship of NOVA classification to food price, culinary skills and public policy analysis are research opportunities.","PeriodicalId":8390,"journal":{"name":"Archivos Latinoamericanos De Nutricion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos Latinoamericanos De Nutricion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37527/2022.72.2.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2009, a food classification was proposed, called NOVA classification. Latin American countries have stood out in their use in nutritional recommendations and regulatory agenda. Objective. To evaluate how scientific production in food and nutrition in Latin America has incorporated the NOVA classification. Materials and methods. The analysis of scientific production was carried out from annals at the Latin American Congress of Nutrition (SLAN) in 2012, 2015 and 2018. The terms used for the search were: NOVA, ultra-processed, processed, processing and food guide, in Portuguese, English and Spanish. After the search, the exclusion and inclusion criteria were applied and the selected abstracts were described according to previously defined analytical variables. Results. A total of 153 were analyzed, 24 of which were published in 2012, 20 in 2015 and 109 in 2018. Most studies were carried out in Brazil (56,2%), followed by Mexico (12,4%) and involved adolescents (28,8%), adults (21,6%) and food (19,6%) as subject or unit of analysis. Most of the works were classified in the area of Public Health Nutrition (88,9%), were observational (82,3%) and used a quantitative method (76,5%). The sale and/or consumption of food (46,4%) and the food environment (24,2%) were the most common objects of study. Conclusion. The scientific production that considers the NOVA classification in Latin America increased in 2018, with Brazil and Mexico leading the development of studies. Studies that explore the relationship of NOVA classification to food price, culinary skills and public policy analysis are research opportunities.
NOVA分类在拉丁美洲食品和营养科学生产中的应用:科学计量学综述
2009年,提出了一种食品分类法,称为NOVA分类法。拉丁美洲国家在营养建议和监管议程中的应用非常突出。客观的评估拉丁美洲食品和营养的科学生产如何纳入NOVA分类。材料和方法。科学生产的分析是在2012年、2015年和2018年拉丁美洲营养大会(SLAN)的年鉴中进行的。搜索使用的术语有:NOVA、超加工、加工、加工和食品指南,葡萄牙语、英语和西班牙语。搜索后,应用排除和纳入标准,并根据先前定义的分析变量描述所选摘要。后果共分析了153篇,其中24篇发表于2012年,20篇发表于2015年,109篇发表于2018年。大多数研究在巴西(56.2%)进行,其次是墨西哥(12.4%),涉及青少年(28,8%)、成年人(21,6%)和食物(19,6%)作为受试者或分析单位。大多数工作被分类在公共卫生营养领域(88,9%),是观察性的(82,3%),并使用定量方法(76.5%)。食品的销售和/或消费(46.4%)和食品环境(24.2%)是最常见的研究对象。结论2018年,拉丁美洲考虑NOVA分类的科学成果有所增加,巴西和墨西哥引领了研究的发展。探索NOVA分类与食品价格、烹饪技能和公共政策分析之间关系的研究是研究机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Archivos Latinoamericanos de Nutrición (ALAN) is the official publication of the Sociedad Latinoamericana de Nutición (SLAN), for the dissemination of knowledge in the fields of food and nutrition, principally throughout the American Hemisphere. Articles in Spanish, English, Portuguese and French are accepted, both from the Society members and from nonmembers, in the following categories: 1. General articles (critical scientific reviews); 2. Research articles (originals); 3. Papers in applied nutrition (analytical results from intervention programs and discussion of reconmendations of practical application), and 4. Letters to Editor (short comments of general interest or about scientific facts and results previously published in Archives).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信