Meanings of management in the post-socialist higher education: the case of Lithuania

IF 2.4 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
I. Rybnikova, Rainhart Lang
{"title":"Meanings of management in the post-socialist higher education: the case of Lithuania","authors":"I. Rybnikova, Rainhart Lang","doi":"10.1108/bjm-09-2020-0330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe study examines prevailing understandings and meanings of management represented in Lithuanian higher management education as a selected East European post-socialist country. While concentrating on the notion of management as an institution, the study draws upon the concept of “travel of ideas” by Czarniawska (2008). The study aims at analysing what reasons led to the development of specific management meanings in Lithuanian higher education by considering local historical and socio-political processes of transformation.Design/methodology/approachThe empirical analysis is based on a qualitative content analysis of 23 relevant textbooks on general management in Lithuania, written by local authors.FindingsThe results show that the reception and translation of management concepts in Lithuania is mainly focused on rationalistic Anglo-Saxon concepts. Dominating meanings are informed by Taylorism, with alternative or critical management approaches remaining absent. The study additionally reveals the effect of “imprinting”, referring to the fact that local management pioneers have a considerable and sustainable impact on how and which management models and theories are adopted in management education.Research limitations/implicationsSince the analysis is limited to local textbooks in higher education of only one post-socialist country, there is a need for further research, especially for the inclusion of the remaining Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries. Additionally, other factors that may influence management meanings in higher education in post-socialist countries need to be considered by analysing translated books, management programmes or guest lecturers from other countries.Practical implicationsOne of the central implications of the research into management in higher education is the call for a stronger inclusion of management ideas that go beyond Taylorist approaches. These could be team-based management or participative management, as these potentially better align with work-oriented expectations by prospective, especially young, employees.Originality/valueThe study shows the relevance of historic roots regarding managerial thought. The study identifies an “imprinting” by local pioneers in the field of management that establishes initial and enduring meanings of management in a considered country. The mechanism of “imprinting” serves as a selective filter and indicates a local general receptivity towards certain ideas and could, thus, enable or impede travelling of ideas. In the case of Lithuanian higher management education, the study shows that “imprinting” has led to a narrow meaning of management with a higher receptivity towards concepts and approaches that align with Taylor's scientific management theory.","PeriodicalId":46829,"journal":{"name":"Baltic Journal of Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltic Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bjm-09-2020-0330","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe study examines prevailing understandings and meanings of management represented in Lithuanian higher management education as a selected East European post-socialist country. While concentrating on the notion of management as an institution, the study draws upon the concept of “travel of ideas” by Czarniawska (2008). The study aims at analysing what reasons led to the development of specific management meanings in Lithuanian higher education by considering local historical and socio-political processes of transformation.Design/methodology/approachThe empirical analysis is based on a qualitative content analysis of 23 relevant textbooks on general management in Lithuania, written by local authors.FindingsThe results show that the reception and translation of management concepts in Lithuania is mainly focused on rationalistic Anglo-Saxon concepts. Dominating meanings are informed by Taylorism, with alternative or critical management approaches remaining absent. The study additionally reveals the effect of “imprinting”, referring to the fact that local management pioneers have a considerable and sustainable impact on how and which management models and theories are adopted in management education.Research limitations/implicationsSince the analysis is limited to local textbooks in higher education of only one post-socialist country, there is a need for further research, especially for the inclusion of the remaining Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries. Additionally, other factors that may influence management meanings in higher education in post-socialist countries need to be considered by analysing translated books, management programmes or guest lecturers from other countries.Practical implicationsOne of the central implications of the research into management in higher education is the call for a stronger inclusion of management ideas that go beyond Taylorist approaches. These could be team-based management or participative management, as these potentially better align with work-oriented expectations by prospective, especially young, employees.Originality/valueThe study shows the relevance of historic roots regarding managerial thought. The study identifies an “imprinting” by local pioneers in the field of management that establishes initial and enduring meanings of management in a considered country. The mechanism of “imprinting” serves as a selective filter and indicates a local general receptivity towards certain ideas and could, thus, enable or impede travelling of ideas. In the case of Lithuanian higher management education, the study shows that “imprinting” has led to a narrow meaning of management with a higher receptivity towards concepts and approaches that align with Taylor's scientific management theory.
管理在后社会主义高等教育中的意义:以立陶宛为例
目的:本研究考察了立陶宛高等管理教育作为东欧后社会主义国家所代表的管理的普遍理解和意义。在关注管理作为一种制度的概念的同时,该研究借鉴了Czarniawska(2008)的“思想之旅”概念。该研究旨在通过考虑当地的历史和社会政治转型过程,分析导致立陶宛高等教育中具体管理意义发展的原因。设计/方法/方法实证分析基于对立陶宛当地作者撰写的23本有关综合管理的教科书进行定性内容分析。结果表明,立陶宛对管理理念的接受和翻译主要集中在理性的盎格鲁-撒克逊理念上。主导意义由泰勒主义提供,替代或关键的管理方法仍然缺席。该研究还揭示了“印记”效应,即本地管理先驱者对管理教育如何采用以及采用哪些管理模式和理论具有相当大且可持续的影响。研究限制/影响由于分析仅限于一个后社会主义国家高等教育的当地教科书,因此需要进一步研究,特别是要包括其余的中欧和东欧(CEE)国家。此外,需要通过分析来自其他国家的翻译书籍、管理方案或客座讲师来考虑可能影响后社会主义国家高等教育中管理意义的其他因素。实际意义高等教育管理研究的中心意义之一是呼吁更强有力地纳入超越泰勒主义方法的管理思想。这些可能是基于团队的管理或参与式管理,因为这些可能更好地符合未来员工(尤其是年轻员工)以工作为导向的期望。独创性/价值该研究显示了历史根源与管理思想的相关性。这项研究确定了管理领域的当地先驱者的“印记”,在一个所考虑的国家确立了最初和持久的管理意义。“烙印”机制是一种选择性的过滤器,表明当地对某些思想的普遍接受程度,从而可能促进或阻碍思想的传播。以立陶宛高等管理教育为例,该研究表明,“印记”导致管理学的狭义化,对与泰勒科学管理理论相一致的概念和方法的接受程度更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.70%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The Baltic region has experienced rapid political and economic change over recent years. The challenges to managers and management researchers operating within the area are often different to those experienced in other parts of the world. The Baltic Journal of Management contributes to an understanding of different management cultures and provides readers with a fresh look at emerging management practices and research in the countries of the Baltic region and beyond.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信