Structure and Organization of Home-Based Care for Older Adults in Different Countries: A Scoping Review

IF 0.6 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Khorshid Mobasseri, H. Matlabi, H. Allahverdipour, Fariba Pashazadeh, A. Kousha
{"title":"Structure and Organization of Home-Based Care for Older Adults in Different Countries: A Scoping Review","authors":"Khorshid Mobasseri, H. Matlabi, H. Allahverdipour, Fariba Pashazadeh, A. Kousha","doi":"10.5812/healthscope-136546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Population aging, the burden of chronic diseases, and the cost-effectiveness of home care (HC), compared to hospitalization and institutionalization, have increased the importance of HC. Therefore, there is a need to share the experiences of leading countries in home-based long-term care (LTC) for older individuals. Objectives: This review aimed to explain the structure of HC for older adults in different countries. Methods: A scoping review was performed on HC published in English using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and grey literature. The search began in January 2022, and the latest search was conducted in June 2023. The main keywords ‘home care’, ‘old*’, ‘Funding', 'organization’ and ‘training’ and ‘policy’ and ‘formal care’ and ‘home-based services’ were used for searching. The data were classified into 7 domains, including 1) governing, 2) long-term care insurance (LTCI), eligibility for HC services and financing, 3) benefits, 4) marketization and free choice system, 5) workforce training, 6) quality assurance of care, and 7) supporting caregivers. Results: Overall, 44 documents out of 4072 studies were included in the final analysis, containing data from 23 countries. Each study covers some domains of HC, and some other studies compare domains in some Asian and European countries. The regulation makes authorities organize high-quality care. Ministries set legal frameworks, and municipalities are autonomous in determining principles and financing of services. Older adults are eligible to receive cash and in-kind benefits based on their needs or assets. Financing is done using insurance, taxes, or privately. Some countries have made the quality assessment of services mandatory. Conclusions: This review can generate novel insights into designing HC systems according to different contexts. Comprehensive information on HC organizations for older adults was only available in some countries. Therefore, further in-depth studies are needed to assess each component of the HC system separately. Defining legal rights and responsibilities for caregivers and older individuals, universal coverage of LTCI for all older adults, financial and care options to help pay for HC, and training family caregivers are recommended for developing countries.","PeriodicalId":12857,"journal":{"name":"Health Scope","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Scope","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/healthscope-136546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Population aging, the burden of chronic diseases, and the cost-effectiveness of home care (HC), compared to hospitalization and institutionalization, have increased the importance of HC. Therefore, there is a need to share the experiences of leading countries in home-based long-term care (LTC) for older individuals. Objectives: This review aimed to explain the structure of HC for older adults in different countries. Methods: A scoping review was performed on HC published in English using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and grey literature. The search began in January 2022, and the latest search was conducted in June 2023. The main keywords ‘home care’, ‘old*’, ‘Funding', 'organization’ and ‘training’ and ‘policy’ and ‘formal care’ and ‘home-based services’ were used for searching. The data were classified into 7 domains, including 1) governing, 2) long-term care insurance (LTCI), eligibility for HC services and financing, 3) benefits, 4) marketization and free choice system, 5) workforce training, 6) quality assurance of care, and 7) supporting caregivers. Results: Overall, 44 documents out of 4072 studies were included in the final analysis, containing data from 23 countries. Each study covers some domains of HC, and some other studies compare domains in some Asian and European countries. The regulation makes authorities organize high-quality care. Ministries set legal frameworks, and municipalities are autonomous in determining principles and financing of services. Older adults are eligible to receive cash and in-kind benefits based on their needs or assets. Financing is done using insurance, taxes, or privately. Some countries have made the quality assessment of services mandatory. Conclusions: This review can generate novel insights into designing HC systems according to different contexts. Comprehensive information on HC organizations for older adults was only available in some countries. Therefore, further in-depth studies are needed to assess each component of the HC system separately. Defining legal rights and responsibilities for caregivers and older individuals, universal coverage of LTCI for all older adults, financial and care options to help pay for HC, and training family caregivers are recommended for developing countries.
不同国家老年人家庭护理的结构和组织:范围界定综述
背景:人口老龄化、慢性病负担和家庭护理(HC)的成本效益,与住院和机构相比,增加了HC的重要性。因此,有必要分享主要国家在老年人居家长期护理(LTC)方面的经验。目的:本综述旨在解释不同国家老年人HC的结构。方法:采用PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science、CINAHL、谷歌Scholar和灰色文献对英文版HC文献进行文献综述。搜寻工作于2022年1月开始,最近一次是在2023年6月进行的。搜寻时使用的主要关键词为“家居护理”、“长者*”、“经费”、“机构”、“培训”、“政策”、“正规护理”及“家居服务”。数据被划分为7个领域,包括1)管理,2)长期护理保险(LTCI), HC服务和融资资格,3)福利,4)市场化和自由选择制度,5)劳动力培训,6)护理质量保证,7)支持护理人员。结果:总体而言,4072项研究中的44份文件被纳入最终分析,包含来自23个国家的数据。每项研究都涵盖了HC的一些领域,其他一些研究比较了一些亚洲和欧洲国家的领域。该条例使当局能够组织高质量的护理。各部制定法律框架,市政当局自主决定各项服务的原则和资金筹措。老年人有资格根据其需要或资产领取现金和实物福利。融资是通过保险、税收或私人方式完成的。一些国家强制要求对服务进行质量评估。结论:这篇综述可以为根据不同情况设计HC系统提供新的见解。只有在一些国家才有关于老年人HC组织的全面信息。因此,需要进一步深入研究,分别评估HC系统的各个组成部分。建议为发展中国家确定护理人员和老年人的法律权利和责任,为所有老年人全面覆盖长期护理,提供财政和护理选择以帮助支付HC费用,并培训家庭护理人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Scope
Health Scope PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
16.70%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信