{"title":"Good governance and the development of an ethical framework for the UK National Screening Committee","authors":"R. Brownsword, Catherine W. Joynson","doi":"10.1177/09685332231194303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following COVID-19, good governance of public health is self-evidently a priority. Those who have governance responsibilities should act with integrity, and public health interventions should be both effective and ethically sound. In this context, this article focuses on the work recently undertaken by the UK National Screening Committee (NSC) in reviewing how it engages with and resolves the ethical questions raised by health screening. The article sketches the context for this review and the challenges faced; it describes the review process and the principal review outputs (including the ethical framework); and it reflects on a number of issues that are provoked by the ethical framework. Given the post-pandemic re-organisation of public health, the importance of embedding ethics in screening practice is underlined. If the United Kingdom is to be a standard-bearer for world-leading screening, it is essential that the NSC sustains its commitment to the ideals of good governance.","PeriodicalId":39602,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law International","volume":"23 1","pages":"271 - 296"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Law International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09685332231194303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Following COVID-19, good governance of public health is self-evidently a priority. Those who have governance responsibilities should act with integrity, and public health interventions should be both effective and ethically sound. In this context, this article focuses on the work recently undertaken by the UK National Screening Committee (NSC) in reviewing how it engages with and resolves the ethical questions raised by health screening. The article sketches the context for this review and the challenges faced; it describes the review process and the principal review outputs (including the ethical framework); and it reflects on a number of issues that are provoked by the ethical framework. Given the post-pandemic re-organisation of public health, the importance of embedding ethics in screening practice is underlined. If the United Kingdom is to be a standard-bearer for world-leading screening, it is essential that the NSC sustains its commitment to the ideals of good governance.
期刊介绍:
The scope includes: Clinical Negligence. Health Matters Affecting Civil Liberties. Forensic Medicine. Determination of Death. Organ and Tissue Transplantation. End of Life Decisions. Legal and Ethical Issues in Medical Treatment. Confidentiality. Access to Medical Records. Medical Complaints Procedures. Professional Discipline. Employment Law and Legal Issues within NHS. Resource Allocation in Health Care. Mental Health Law. Misuse of Drugs. Legal and Ethical Issues concerning Human Reproduction. Therapeutic Products. Medical Research. Cloning. Gene Therapy. Genetic Testing and Screening. And Related Topics.