{"title":"Cambridge Economics in the Post-Keynesian Era: How Mainstream Economics Replaced Cambridge Economics","authors":"N. Martins","doi":"10.1093/cpe/bzad014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The book Cambridge Economics in the Post-Keynesian Era: The Eclipse of Heterodox Traditions, by Ashwani Saith, explains how various approaches to the study of economics at Cambridge, UK, were replaced by mainstream economics, as practiced in leading North American universities. This article reviews the book, while also connecting the narrative provided in the book to central questions regarding the Cambridge economic tradition, and the various approaches that constitute it. The differences between the type of applied economics developed at Cambridge and in contemporary mainstream economics are also discussed. To do so, a distinction between Marshallian realism and Walrasian formalism is made here. Albeit this distinction is not emphasised in Saith’s book, it helps to supplement and understand the persuasive and important narrative provided by Saith.","PeriodicalId":38730,"journal":{"name":"Contributions to Political Economy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contributions to Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cpe/bzad014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The book Cambridge Economics in the Post-Keynesian Era: The Eclipse of Heterodox Traditions, by Ashwani Saith, explains how various approaches to the study of economics at Cambridge, UK, were replaced by mainstream economics, as practiced in leading North American universities. This article reviews the book, while also connecting the narrative provided in the book to central questions regarding the Cambridge economic tradition, and the various approaches that constitute it. The differences between the type of applied economics developed at Cambridge and in contemporary mainstream economics are also discussed. To do so, a distinction between Marshallian realism and Walrasian formalism is made here. Albeit this distinction is not emphasised in Saith’s book, it helps to supplement and understand the persuasive and important narrative provided by Saith.
阿什瓦尼·赛斯(Ashwani Saith)的《后凯恩斯主义时代的剑桥经济学:异质传统的衰落》(Cambridge Economics in The Post Keynes Era:The Eclipse of Heterodox Traditions)一书解释了英国剑桥大学的各种经济学研究方法是如何被主流经济学所取代的,正如北美顶尖大学所实践的那样。这篇文章回顾了这本书,同时也将书中提供的叙述与剑桥经济传统的核心问题以及构成它的各种方法联系起来。还讨论了剑桥发展起来的应用经济学类型与当代主流经济学之间的差异。为了做到这一点,这里对马歇尔现实主义和瓦尔拉斯形式主义进行了区分。尽管赛斯的书中没有强调这一区别,但它有助于补充和理解赛斯提供的具有说服力的重要叙事。
期刊介绍:
Contributions to Political Economy provides a forum for the academic discussion of original ideas and arguments drawn from important critical traditions in economic analysis. Articles fall broadly within the lines of thought associated with the work of the Classical political economists, Marx, Keynes, and Sraffa. While the majority of articles are theoretical and historical in emphasis, the journal welcomes articles of a more applied character. It also reviews noteworthy books recently published.