Envoi

IF 1 4区 综合性期刊 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Reviel Netz
{"title":"Envoi","authors":"Reviel Netz","doi":"10.1080/03080188.2022.2130593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"(The sense of ‘X→ Y’ is ‘X made Y substantially more probable’). I concluded that while (1) has merit and is worth pursuing, it is only (2) which is in fact compelling. I now learned that it would be preferable to curtail (2) further. The curtailment of the consequent is straightforward. Much of the discussion in this volume concerned the difficulties of counterfactual history. I find now that it is intemperate to seek to explain something such as ‘The Industrial Revolution’. This event is messy and multicausal, and quite obviously categorically different from ‘Greek Mathematics’. It is, however, interesting enough to argue","PeriodicalId":50352,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Science Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Science Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2022.2130593","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

(The sense of ‘X→ Y’ is ‘X made Y substantially more probable’). I concluded that while (1) has merit and is worth pursuing, it is only (2) which is in fact compelling. I now learned that it would be preferable to curtail (2) further. The curtailment of the consequent is straightforward. Much of the discussion in this volume concerned the difficulties of counterfactual history. I find now that it is intemperate to seek to explain something such as ‘The Industrial Revolution’. This event is messy and multicausal, and quite obviously categorically different from ‘Greek Mathematics’. It is, however, interesting enough to argue
发送
(X的意义→ Y’是‘X使Y的可能性大大增加’)。我得出的结论是,虽然(1)有优点,值得追求,但事实上只有(2)才有说服力。我现在了解到,进一步削减开支会更好。削减后果是直接的。这本书中的大部分讨论都涉及反事实历史的困难。我现在发现,试图解释诸如“工业革命”之类的东西是过分的。这个事件是混乱的,多配偶的,与“希腊数学”截然不同。然而,这很有趣,可以争论
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interdisciplinary Science Reviews
Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
20
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interdisciplinary Science Reviews is a quarterly journal that aims to explore the social, philosophical and historical interrelations of the natural sciences, engineering, mathematics, medicine and technology with the social sciences, humanities and arts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信