Effects of Different Finishing Procedures on Surface Roughness of Hybrid CAD/CAM Materials

IF 0.2 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
E. Akan, O. Colgecen, Ibrahim Talha Meşe, B. Bağış
{"title":"Effects of Different Finishing Procedures on Surface Roughness of Hybrid CAD/CAM Materials","authors":"E. Akan, O. Colgecen, Ibrahim Talha Meşe, B. Bağış","doi":"10.14693/jdi.v28i3.1298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hybrid ceramics combine the beneficial properties of resin with the advantage of glass ceramics. However, there are limited study about on roughness properties of hybrid materials. Objective: To investigate of the effects of surface finishing methods on roughness of dental restorations made from hybrid CAD/CAM blocks. Methods: A total of 60 samples were produced (n=20) for three main material groups, two different hybrid ceramic (LAVA Ultimate and VITA Enamic) and a conventional glass ceramic (IPS e.max CAD). Each material group was divided into two subgroups (n=10). Ten samples were polished and 10 were glazed according to related manufacturer instructions. Surface roughness was measured with a surface profilometer. Data were statistically analysed using two-way ANOVA (p<0.05). Results: This study revealed that glazed surfaces were exhibited higher surface roughness values than polished surfaces in all materials (p<0.001). Minimum Ra values were belonged to Lava Ultimate polished group (Ra=0,07 μm) and maximum values were belonged to IPS e.max CAD glazed group (Ra=0,38 μm). Conclusion: Within the limitations of the present study, it may be suggested that finishing the hybrid ceramic restorations by mechanical polishing instead of glaze gives better clinical performance in regard to surface roughness.","PeriodicalId":53873,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dentistry Indonesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dentistry Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14693/jdi.v28i3.1298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Hybrid ceramics combine the beneficial properties of resin with the advantage of glass ceramics. However, there are limited study about on roughness properties of hybrid materials. Objective: To investigate of the effects of surface finishing methods on roughness of dental restorations made from hybrid CAD/CAM blocks. Methods: A total of 60 samples were produced (n=20) for three main material groups, two different hybrid ceramic (LAVA Ultimate and VITA Enamic) and a conventional glass ceramic (IPS e.max CAD). Each material group was divided into two subgroups (n=10). Ten samples were polished and 10 were glazed according to related manufacturer instructions. Surface roughness was measured with a surface profilometer. Data were statistically analysed using two-way ANOVA (p<0.05). Results: This study revealed that glazed surfaces were exhibited higher surface roughness values than polished surfaces in all materials (p<0.001). Minimum Ra values were belonged to Lava Ultimate polished group (Ra=0,07 μm) and maximum values were belonged to IPS e.max CAD glazed group (Ra=0,38 μm). Conclusion: Within the limitations of the present study, it may be suggested that finishing the hybrid ceramic restorations by mechanical polishing instead of glaze gives better clinical performance in regard to surface roughness.
不同精加工工艺对复合CAD/CAM材料表面粗糙度的影响
混合陶瓷结合了树脂的有益性能和玻璃陶瓷的优点。然而,对杂化材料的粗糙度特性的研究还很有限。目的:探讨表面处理方法对复合CAD/CAM块修复体表面粗糙度的影响。方法:共制作了60个样品(n=20),用于三种主要材料组,两种不同的混合陶瓷(LAVA Ultimate和VITA Enamic)和一种传统玻璃陶瓷(IPS e.max CAD)。每个材料组被分为两个亚组(n=10)。根据相关制造商说明对10个样品进行抛光,并对10个进行上釉。使用表面轮廓仪测量表面粗糙度。使用双向方差分析对数据进行统计分析(p<0.05)。结果:本研究表明,在所有材料中,釉面表面的表面粗糙度值均高于抛光表面(p<0.001)。最小Ra值属于Lava Ultimate抛光组(Ra=0.07μm),最大Ra值属于IPS e.max CAD釉面组(Ra=0.38μm)。结论:在本研究的范围内,可以认为用机械抛光代替釉料抛光混合陶瓷修复体在表面粗糙度方面具有更好的临床性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Dentistry Indonesia
Journal of Dentistry Indonesia DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信