Forensic Practitioner Testimony and Jury Instructions Involving Insanity Defense

IF 2.1 4区医学 Q1 LAW

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.29158/JAAPL.230066L1-23

J. Cohn, Jennifer Karlin

引用次数: 0

Abstract

dominant cause of mental injury. The court also concluded that the Commission did not err by affirming the Board’s denial of a SIME. Additionally, the court ruled that the Board’s exclusion of parts ofMs.Magestro’s testimony was not prejudicial, particularly because Ms. Magestro conceded she was unqualified to offer diagnoses.Ms. Patterson was permitted to present other opinions by qualified experts, yet the Board assigned more weight to the opposing expert.

查看原文本刊更多论文

涉及精神错乱辩护的法医证言和陪审团指示

精神损伤的主要原因。法院还得出结论，委员会确认了董事会对SIME的否认，并没有犯错误。此外，法院裁定，委员会排除Magestro女士的部分证词并不具有偏见，特别是因为Magestro承认她没有资格提供诊断。Patterson女士被允许由合格的专家提出其他意见，但委员会对反对专家给予了更多的重视。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Multiple-

CiteScore

2.00

自引率

29.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law (AAPL, pronounced "apple") is an organization of psychiatrists dedicated to excellence in practice, teaching, and research in forensic psychiatry. Founded in 1969, AAPL currently has more than 1,500 members in North America and around the world.