A Clinical Study on Etiological Factors and Management of Epistaxis at a Tertiary Level Hospital

IF 0.1 Q4 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
R. Islam, Mohammad Asraful Islam, A. R. E. Mahbub, A. Chowdhury, N. Islam, Affa Khan
{"title":"A Clinical Study on Etiological Factors and Management of Epistaxis at a Tertiary Level Hospital","authors":"R. Islam, Mohammad Asraful Islam, A. R. E. Mahbub, A. Chowdhury, N. Islam, Affa Khan","doi":"10.3329/bjo.v26i1.47953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Epistaxis is a common otolaryngological emergency worldwide affecting up to 60% of the population in their lifetime. This study was conducted to describe the etiological profile and treatment outcome of epistaxis at Dhaka Medical College Hospital, a tertiary care hospital in BANGLADESH. Objective: The study is carried out with an objective to evaluate on etiological profile and management of epistaxis. Methods: This cross sectional study was conducted among the emergency and admitted patient with epistaxis at Dhaka Medical College Hospital from 1 November 2013 to 30 April 2014. Results: During the period under study, a total 104 patients were studied. The etiology of the cause of epistaxis was grouped into traumatic and nontraumatic. Among them 46 (44.23%) patient were in traumatic epistaxis and 58 (55.77%) patient were in non traumatic epistaxis. Male were affected more frequently than female in this study. There were 74 (71.15%) male and 30 (28.85%) females with a male female ratio of 2.47:1 Majority of the patients in this study were in 2 decade (21.15%) followed by 6 decade (19.23%) and 3 decade (17.31%). Among the 104 patients with epistaxis 78 (75%) were urban habitat and 26 (25%) were rural habitat. Significantly more patients were from urban resident. Regarding etiology and sex distribution there were no significant differences between urban and rural habitat. The present study shows that the most common cause of epistaxis was trauma (44.23%) followed by idiopathic (25%) and hypertension (17.31%). Local pain (41.31%), nasal obstruction (13.04%), 1 Medical Officer, National Institute of ENT, Tejgaon, Dhaka. 2 Medical Officer, Dept. of Otolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery, BSMMU, Dhaka. 3 Resident Surgeon (ENT), Dept. of Otolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery, DMCH, Dhaka. 4 Assistant Registrar, Dept. of Otolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery, DMCH, Dhaka. 5 Assistant Prof.(ENT), National Institute Of Ophthalmology & Hospital, Dhaka 6 Professor of ENT and Line Director Medical Education & Health Manpower Development, DGHS, Dhaka. 7 Professor & Ex-Head, Dept. of Otolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery, DMCH, Dhaka. Address of Correspondence: Dr. Rashedul Islam, Medical Officer, National Institute of ENT, Tejgaon, Dhaka. Mob:+88-01718033316, E-mail: irashedul2532@gmail.com Introduction: Epistaxis, active bleeding from the nose, is a common ear, nose and throat emergency and can be severe or even fatal. The causes can be from local or systemic illness. Epistaxis is classified as anterior or posterior on the basis of the primary bleeding site. Haemorrhage is most commonly anterior, originating from the nasal septum. A common source of anterior epistaxis is the kiesselbach’s plexus, an anastomotic network of vessels on the anterior portion of the nasal septum. Epistaxis occurs in up to 60% of general population at some point in their life time. About 6% of these people will seek medical attention. Usually it is spontaneous and stops by itself or may be controlled with home remedies. However at times it could be massive and may be fatal. The etiology of epistaxis is divided into local and systemic causes. Local causes: Inflammatory-infectious (rhinitis, rhinosinusitis) , traumatic (digital, fractures, nasal surgeries), anatomic (Septal deviation and perforation), foreign body, chemical or Climatic agents, and nasal tumors (nasopharyngeal angiofibroma , nasal polyposis, inverted papilloma, carcinoma). Systemic causes: The arterial hypertension in the most frequently associated clinical factor, blood dyscrasis, drugs (acetylsalicylic acid, anticoagulants, non hormonal antiinflammatory, antibiotics), neoplasms etc. It is important to find the bleeding site and define its etiology (local or systemic) for indication of the best treatment. The severe epistaxis, associated to prevailing factors such as systemic arterial hypertension and coagulopathy may need a surgical approach in the cases refractory to conservative treatment, such as cauterization and nasal splint. Traumatic epistaxis is more common in younger individual (under age 35 years) and is most often due to digital trauma, facial injury, or a foreign body in the nasal cavity. Non-traumatic epistaxis is more nasal deformity (17.39%) associated other injury (13.04%) was more frequent in traumatic patient. Significant raise of blood pressure (Systoloic BP >160 mm Hg and diastolic BP > 100 mm Hg) were found in 58 (55.77%) non-traumatic patient. Severity of the nasal bleeding was mild to severe degree in both the groups. Significantly anterior epistaxis is common among the traumatic epistaxis group (69.57%) and posterior epistaxis in non-traumatic epistaxis group (46.55%). About 27.59% patient the exact site was not detected as there was diffuse bleeding. In case of nasal bleeding, bleeding from septum 42 (40.38%), from lateral wall 32 (30.76%) and from floor of the nose 23 (22.15%). Control of bleeding by the direct method was possible in 11 (10.57%) patients. Anterior nasal packing was given in 86 (82.69%) patients and post nasal packing was given in 3 (2.89%) patients. Conclusion: A high incidence in young adults was reported with preponderance of males over females. Occurrence of different types of epistaxis was strongly related with the certain demographic factors like age, sex and habitat of the patient. This study supports the credibility of conservative management procedure in the treatment of epistaxis. Simple nasal packing is the commonly practice conservative method with high success. Hence, this approach should be the preferred option in the management of epistaxis especially in developing countries.","PeriodicalId":53915,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Journal of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Journal of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/bjo.v26i1.47953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Epistaxis is a common otolaryngological emergency worldwide affecting up to 60% of the population in their lifetime. This study was conducted to describe the etiological profile and treatment outcome of epistaxis at Dhaka Medical College Hospital, a tertiary care hospital in BANGLADESH. Objective: The study is carried out with an objective to evaluate on etiological profile and management of epistaxis. Methods: This cross sectional study was conducted among the emergency and admitted patient with epistaxis at Dhaka Medical College Hospital from 1 November 2013 to 30 April 2014. Results: During the period under study, a total 104 patients were studied. The etiology of the cause of epistaxis was grouped into traumatic and nontraumatic. Among them 46 (44.23%) patient were in traumatic epistaxis and 58 (55.77%) patient were in non traumatic epistaxis. Male were affected more frequently than female in this study. There were 74 (71.15%) male and 30 (28.85%) females with a male female ratio of 2.47:1 Majority of the patients in this study were in 2 decade (21.15%) followed by 6 decade (19.23%) and 3 decade (17.31%). Among the 104 patients with epistaxis 78 (75%) were urban habitat and 26 (25%) were rural habitat. Significantly more patients were from urban resident. Regarding etiology and sex distribution there were no significant differences between urban and rural habitat. The present study shows that the most common cause of epistaxis was trauma (44.23%) followed by idiopathic (25%) and hypertension (17.31%). Local pain (41.31%), nasal obstruction (13.04%), 1 Medical Officer, National Institute of ENT, Tejgaon, Dhaka. 2 Medical Officer, Dept. of Otolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery, BSMMU, Dhaka. 3 Resident Surgeon (ENT), Dept. of Otolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery, DMCH, Dhaka. 4 Assistant Registrar, Dept. of Otolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery, DMCH, Dhaka. 5 Assistant Prof.(ENT), National Institute Of Ophthalmology & Hospital, Dhaka 6 Professor of ENT and Line Director Medical Education & Health Manpower Development, DGHS, Dhaka. 7 Professor & Ex-Head, Dept. of Otolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery, DMCH, Dhaka. Address of Correspondence: Dr. Rashedul Islam, Medical Officer, National Institute of ENT, Tejgaon, Dhaka. Mob:+88-01718033316, E-mail: irashedul2532@gmail.com Introduction: Epistaxis, active bleeding from the nose, is a common ear, nose and throat emergency and can be severe or even fatal. The causes can be from local or systemic illness. Epistaxis is classified as anterior or posterior on the basis of the primary bleeding site. Haemorrhage is most commonly anterior, originating from the nasal septum. A common source of anterior epistaxis is the kiesselbach’s plexus, an anastomotic network of vessels on the anterior portion of the nasal septum. Epistaxis occurs in up to 60% of general population at some point in their life time. About 6% of these people will seek medical attention. Usually it is spontaneous and stops by itself or may be controlled with home remedies. However at times it could be massive and may be fatal. The etiology of epistaxis is divided into local and systemic causes. Local causes: Inflammatory-infectious (rhinitis, rhinosinusitis) , traumatic (digital, fractures, nasal surgeries), anatomic (Septal deviation and perforation), foreign body, chemical or Climatic agents, and nasal tumors (nasopharyngeal angiofibroma , nasal polyposis, inverted papilloma, carcinoma). Systemic causes: The arterial hypertension in the most frequently associated clinical factor, blood dyscrasis, drugs (acetylsalicylic acid, anticoagulants, non hormonal antiinflammatory, antibiotics), neoplasms etc. It is important to find the bleeding site and define its etiology (local or systemic) for indication of the best treatment. The severe epistaxis, associated to prevailing factors such as systemic arterial hypertension and coagulopathy may need a surgical approach in the cases refractory to conservative treatment, such as cauterization and nasal splint. Traumatic epistaxis is more common in younger individual (under age 35 years) and is most often due to digital trauma, facial injury, or a foreign body in the nasal cavity. Non-traumatic epistaxis is more nasal deformity (17.39%) associated other injury (13.04%) was more frequent in traumatic patient. Significant raise of blood pressure (Systoloic BP >160 mm Hg and diastolic BP > 100 mm Hg) were found in 58 (55.77%) non-traumatic patient. Severity of the nasal bleeding was mild to severe degree in both the groups. Significantly anterior epistaxis is common among the traumatic epistaxis group (69.57%) and posterior epistaxis in non-traumatic epistaxis group (46.55%). About 27.59% patient the exact site was not detected as there was diffuse bleeding. In case of nasal bleeding, bleeding from septum 42 (40.38%), from lateral wall 32 (30.76%) and from floor of the nose 23 (22.15%). Control of bleeding by the direct method was possible in 11 (10.57%) patients. Anterior nasal packing was given in 86 (82.69%) patients and post nasal packing was given in 3 (2.89%) patients. Conclusion: A high incidence in young adults was reported with preponderance of males over females. Occurrence of different types of epistaxis was strongly related with the certain demographic factors like age, sex and habitat of the patient. This study supports the credibility of conservative management procedure in the treatment of epistaxis. Simple nasal packing is the commonly practice conservative method with high success. Hence, this approach should be the preferred option in the management of epistaxis especially in developing countries.
某三甲医院鼻出血病因及处理的临床研究
背景:鼻出血是一种常见的耳鼻喉科急症,影响全球60%的人口。本研究是在孟加拉国三级医院达卡医学院医院进行的,目的是描述鼻出血的病因和治疗结果。目的:探讨鼻出血的病因及治疗方法。方法:对2013年11月1日至2014年4月30日在达卡医学院附属医院急诊和住院的鼻出血患者进行横断面研究。结果:在研究期间,共研究了104例患者。鼻出血的病因分为外伤性和非外伤性。其中外伤性鼻出血46例(44.23%),非外伤性鼻出血58例(55.77%)。在这项研究中,男性比女性更容易受到影响。男性74例(71.15%),女性30例(28.85%),男女比例为2.47:1本组患者以20岁(21.15%)为主,其次为60岁(19.23%)和30岁(17.31%)。104例鼻出血患者中有78例(75%)生活在城市,26例(25%)生活在农村。明显更多的患者来自城市居民。在病原学和性别分布方面,城乡生境间无显著差异。本研究显示,出血最常见的原因是外伤(44.23%),其次是特发性(25%)和高血压(17.31%)。局部疼痛(41.31%),鼻塞(13.04%),1名医生,达卡Tejgaon国家耳鼻喉科研究所,2名医生,达卡BSMMU耳鼻喉科和头颈外科,3名住院外科医生,耳鼻喉科和头颈外科,达卡DMCH, 4名助理注册主任,达卡DMCH,耳鼻喉科和头颈外科,5名国家眼科和医院研究所,助理教授(耳鼻喉科),达卡DGHS耳鼻喉科教授兼医学教育与卫生人力发展主任。达卡DMCH耳鼻喉科和头颈外科教授兼前主任。通讯地址:达卡特吉冈国立耳鼻喉科研究所医官Rashedul Islam医生。简介:鼻出血是一种常见的耳、鼻、喉急症,病情严重甚至致命。病因可由局部或全身性疾病引起。鼻出血根据原发出血部位分为前出血和后出血。出血最常见的是前侧,起源于鼻中隔。鼻衄的一个常见来源是鼻中隔前段的血管吻合网——基塞尔巴赫神经丛。高达60%的普通人群在其一生中的某个时间点发生鼻出血。其中约6%的人会寻求医疗救助。通常它是自发的,可以自行停止,或者可以用家庭疗法来控制。然而,有时它可能是巨大的,可能是致命的。鼻出血的病因分为局部原因和全身原因。局部原因:炎症感染性(鼻炎、鼻窦炎)、创伤性(指、骨折、鼻手术)、解剖性(鼻中隔偏曲和穿孔)、异物、化学或气候因素、鼻肿瘤(鼻咽血管纤维瘤、鼻息肉病、内翻性乳头状瘤、癌)。全身性原因:与高血压最常相关的临床因素有:血液紊乱、药物(乙酰水杨酸、抗凝剂、非激素抗炎药、抗生素)、肿瘤等。重要的是找到出血部位并确定其病因(局部或全身),以确定最佳治疗的指征。严重的鼻出血,相关的主要因素,如全身性动脉高血压和凝血功能障碍可能需要手术的情况下,保守治疗难治性,如烧灼和鼻夹板。外伤性鼻出血在年轻人(35岁以下)中更为常见,最常见的原因是指外伤、面部损伤或鼻腔异物。非外伤性鼻出血以鼻畸形多见(17.39%),其他损伤多见(13.04%)。58例(55.77%)非创伤性患者血压明显升高(收缩期血压160 mm Hg,舒张期血压100 mm Hg)。两组患者鼻出血的严重程度均为轻至重度。创伤性鼻出血组多见前出血(69.57%),非创伤性鼻出血组多见后出血(46.55%)。约27.59%的患者因弥漫性出血而未检出确切部位。鼻中隔出血42例(40.38%),鼻侧壁出血32例(30.76%),鼻底出血23例(22.15%)。11例(10例)可直接止血。 57%)患者。86例(82.69%)患者行前鼻填塞,3例(2.89%)患者行后鼻填塞。结论:青壮年发病率高,男性多于女性。不同类型鼻出血的发生与患者的年龄、性别、居住地等人口统计学因素密切相关。本研究支持保守治疗鼻出血的可信性。简单鼻腔填塞是常用的保守方法,成功率高。因此,这种方法应该是首选的选择在鼻出血的管理,特别是在发展中国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信